Minimally invasive esophagectomy in the lateral-prone position: Experience of 124 cases in a single center

被引:14
|
作者
Ma, Shaohua [1 ]
Yan, Tianshen [1 ]
Liu, Dandan [1 ]
Wang, Keyi [1 ]
Wang, Jingdi [1 ]
Song, Jintao [1 ]
Wang, Tong [1 ]
He, Wei [1 ]
Bai, Jie [1 ]
Jin, Liang [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Hosp 3, Dept Thorac Surg, 49 North Garden Rd, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
关键词
Esophageal cancer; laparoscopic; thoracoscope; THORACOSCOPIC ESOPHAGECTOMY; CANCER; OUTCOMES; METAANALYSIS; CARCINOMA; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1111/1759-7714.12524
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Minimally invasive esophagectomy was first introduced as a new technique for esophageal cancer treatment 20 years ago. Performing this procedure in the lateral-prone position is the most appropriate method. Since May 2013, our center has performed 124 esophageal cancer operations using this procedure. Herein, we share our experience. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 124 consecutive patients who had received minimally invasive esophagectomy in the lateral-prone position from May 2013 to June 2017. The procedure, operative variables, postoperative complications, and oncology outcomes were assessed. Results: The surgery was successful in all 124 patients; three cases converted to an abdominal opening procedure during surgery. The mean total lymph node harvest was 19.2: 12.9 in the thoracic cavity and 6.0 in the abdominal cavity. The average total operation duration was 376 minutes and blood loss was 156 mL. No mortality occurred within 30 postoperative days. Forty-three cases of postoperative morbidity occurred in 38 patients (30.6%), including 11 anastomotic leakages (8.9%), 1 chyle leak (0.8%), 12 lateral recurrent nerve palsies (9.7%), 11 pulmonary complications (8.9%), and 8 other complications (6.5%). A learning curve indicated that blood loss, operation duration, and the number of lymph nodes harvested would improve with time. Conclusions: Surgical and oncological outcomes following minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer were acceptable. There are some advantages to this technique compared to previous reports of opening procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 43
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Analysis of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy at a Single Veterans Affairs Medical Center
    Skancke, Matthew D.
    Grossman, Robert A.
    Marino, Gustavo
    Brody, Fredrick J.
    Trachiotis, Gregory D.
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 27 (08): : 784 - 789
  • [32] Minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer: laparoscopic transhiatal procedure or thoracoscopy in prone position followed by laparoscopy?
    G. Dapri
    J. Himpens
    G. B. Cadière
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2008, 22 : 1060 - 1069
  • [33] Intrathoracic Esophagogastric Anastomosis Using a Linear Stapler Following Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy in the Prone Position
    Hiroshi Okabe
    Eiji Tanaka
    Shigeru Tsunoda
    Kazutaka Obama
    Yoshiharu Sakai
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2013, 17 : 397 - 402
  • [34] Minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer:: laparoscopic transhiatal procedure or thoracoscopy in prone position followed by laparoscopy?
    Dapri, G.
    Himpens, J.
    Cadiere, G. B.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2008, 22 (04): : 1060 - 1069
  • [35] Minimally invasive esophagectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis of semiprone versus prone position
    Seesing, Maarten F. J.
    Goense, Lucas
    Ruurda, Jelle P.
    Luyer, Misha D. P.
    Nieuwenhuijzen, Grard A. P.
    van Hillegersberg, Richard
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 32 (06): : 2758 - 2765
  • [36] Intrathoracic Esophagogastric Anastomosis Using a Linear Stapler Following Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy in the Prone Position
    Okabe, Hiroshi
    Tanaka, Eiji
    Tsunoda, Shigeru
    Obama, Kazutaka
    Sakai, Yoshiharu
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2013, 17 (02) : 397 - 402
  • [37] Minimally invasive esophagectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis of semiprone versus prone position
    Maarten F. J. Seesing
    Lucas Goense
    Jelle P. Ruurda
    Misha D. P. Luyer
    Grard A. P. Nieuwenhuijzen
    Richard van Hillegersberg
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2018, 32 : 2758 - 2765
  • [38] Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: experience of 200 cases in a single center
    Zheng Haitao
    Xu Jie
    Jiang Lixin
    VIDEOSURGERY AND OTHER MINIINVASIVE TECHNIQUES, 2014, 9 (03) : 337 - 343
  • [39] Comparing Esophagectomy Techniques At a Single Center: Transthoracic vs Transhiatal vs Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy
    Worrell, Stephanie G.
    Willer, Brittany L.
    Mumtaz, Seemal
    Mittal, Sumeet K.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2009, 136 (05) : A929 - A929
  • [40] Evolving changes of minimally invasive esophagectomy: a single-institution experience
    Gambhir, Sahil
    Daly, Shaun
    Maithel, Shelley
    Putnam, Luke R.
    Nguyen, James
    Smith, Brian R.
    Nguyen, Ninh T.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 34 (06): : 2503 - 2511