Outcomes of cingulate epilepsy surgery: insights from an institutional and patient-level systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:6
|
作者
Kerezoudis, Panagiotis [1 ]
Singh, Rohin [2 ]
Worrell, Gregory A. [3 ]
Van Gompel, Jamie J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Neurol Surg, Rochester, MN USA
[2] Mayo Clin Alix Sch Med, Scottsdale, AZ USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Dept Neurol, Rochester, MN USA
关键词
KEYWORDS epilepsy surgery; seizure freedom; cingulate gyrus; systematic review; meta; -analysis; functional; neurosurgery; SUPPLEMENTARY MOTOR AREA; POSTERIOR CINGULATE; GYRUS EPILEPSY; SEIZURES; CHILD; CYTOLOGY; CORTEX;
D O I
10.3171/2021.8.JNS211558
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE Due to their deep and medial location, range of seizure semiologies, and poor localization on ictal electroencephalography (EEG), cingulate gyrus seizures can be difficult to diagnose and treat. The aim of this study was to review the available evidence on postoperative outcomes after cingulate epilepsy surgery. METHODS A comprehensive literature search of the PubMed/MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Ovid Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted to identify studies that investigated postoperative outcomes of patients with cingulate epilepsy. Seizure freedom at the last follow-up (at least 12 months) was the primary endpoint. The literature search was supplemented by the authors' institutional series (4 patients). RESULTS Twenty-one studies were identified, yielding a total of 105 patients (68 with lesional epilepsy [65%]). Median age at surgery was 23 years, and 56% of patients were male. Median epilepsy duration was 7.5 years. Invasive EEG recording was performed on 69% of patients (53% of patients with lesional epilepsy and 97% of those with nonlesional epilepsy, p < 0.001). The most commonly resected region was the anterior cingulate (55%), followed by the posterior (17%) and middle (14%) cingulate. Lesionectomy alone was performed in 9% of patients. Additional extracingulate treatment was performed in 54% of patients (53% of patients with lesional epilepsy vs 57% of those with nonlesional epilepsy, p = 0.87). The most common pathology was cortical dysplasia (54%), followed by low-grade neoplasm (29%) and gliosis (8%). Seizure freedom was noted in 72% of patients (median follow-up 24 months). A neurological deficit was noted in 27% of patients (24% had temporary deficit), with the most common deficit being motor weakness (13%) followed by supplementary motor area syndrome (9.5%). Univariate survival analysis revealed significantly greater probability of seizure freedom in patients with lesional epilepsy (p = 0.015, log-rank test). CONCLUSIONS Surgical treatment of drug-resistant focal epilepsy originating from the cingulate gyrus is safe, leads to low rates of permanent adverse effects, and leads to high rates of long-term seizure freedom in carefully selected patients. These data may serve as a benchmark for surgical counseling of patients with cingulate epilepsy.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 208
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prognostic value of pathogenic variants in Lafora Disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of patient-level data
    Pondrelli, Federica
    Minardi, Raffaella
    Muccioli, Lorenzo
    Zenesini, Corrado
    Vignatelli, Luca
    Licchetta, Laura
    Mostacci, Barbara
    Tinuper, Paolo
    Vander Kooi, Craig W.
    Gentry, Matthew S.
    Bisulli, Francesca
    ORPHANET JOURNAL OF RARE DISEASES, 2023, 18 (01)
  • [22] Surgical Management of Hirayama Disease (Monomelic Amyotrophy): Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Patient-Level Data
    Pennington, Zach
    Lakomkin, Nikita
    Michalopoulos, Giorgos D.
    Mikula, Anthony L.
    Ahn, Edward S.
    Bydon, Mohamad
    Clarke, Michelle J.
    Elder, Benjamin D.
    Fogelson, Jeremy L.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 172 : E278 - E290
  • [23] The effect of epilepsy surgery on productivity: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Siriratnam, Pakeeran
    Foster, Emma
    Shakhatreh, Lubna
    Neal, Andrew
    Carney, Patrick W.
    Jackson, Graeme D.
    O'Brien, Terence J.
    Kwan, Patrick
    Chen, Zhibin
    Ademi, Zanfina
    EPILEPSIA, 2022, 63 (04) : 789 - 811
  • [24] Efficiency of surgery on posttraumatic epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xueping Wang
    Pengna Han
    Qiang wang
    Chen Xie
    Jun Chen
    Neurosurgical Review, 46
  • [25] Epilepsy in pregnancy and reproductive outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Viale, Luz
    Allotey, John
    Cheong-See, Fiona
    Arroyo-Manzano, David
    Mccorry, Dougall
    Bagary, Manny
    Mignini, Luciano
    Khan, Khalid S.
    Zamora, Javier
    Thangaratinam, Shakila
    LANCET, 2015, 386 (10006): : 1845 - 1852
  • [26] Epilepsy in Pregnancy and Reproductive Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Viale, Luz
    Allotey, John
    Cheong-See, Fiona
    Arroyo-Manzano, David
    Mccorry, Dougall
    Bagary, Manny
    Mignini, Luciano
    Khan, Khalid S.
    Zamora, Javier
    Thangaratinam, Shakila
    OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2016, 71 (03) : 142 - 143
  • [27] Long-term seizure outcomes following epilepsy surgery:: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Téllez-Zenteno, JF
    Dhar, R
    Wiebe, S
    BRAIN, 2005, 128 : 1188 - 1198
  • [28] Seizure Outcomes in Occipital Lobe and Posterior Quadrant Epilepsy Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Harward, Stephen C.
    Chen, William C.
    Rolston, John D.
    Haglund, Michael M.
    Englot, Dario J.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 82 (03) : 350 - 358
  • [29] Epilepsy surgery for children with epileptic spasms: A systematic review and meta-analysis with focus on predictors and outcomes
    Kolosky, Taylor
    Shipper, Andrea Goldstein
    Sun, Kai
    Tozduman, Busra
    Bentzen, Soren
    Moosa, Ahsan N.
    Erdemir, Gozde
    EPILEPSIA OPEN, 2024, 9 (04) : 1136 - 1147
  • [30] Hemispheric surgery for refractory epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis with emphasis on seizure predictors and outcomes
    Hu, Wen-Han
    Zhang, Chao
    Zhang, Kai
    Shao, Xiao-Qiu
    Zhang, Jian-Guo
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 124 (04) : 952 - 961