SIMPLE TOOLS FOR HR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION IN ARGENTINEAN SME

被引:0
|
作者
Adolfo Viltard, Leandro [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Andres Perez, Juan [5 ]
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Catolica Argentina, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[2] Univ Palermo, Fac Ciencias Econ, Grad Sch Business, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[3] Univ Pacifico, Guayaquil, Ecuador
[4] Univ Nacl La Pampa, Santa Rosa, Argentina
[5] Univ Nacl Lujan, Lujan, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[6] Univ Nacl Comahue, Neuquen, Argentina
来源
关键词
Performance; Evaluation; SME; HR; Competitiveness; Objective;
D O I
10.14807/ijmp.v11i2.1063
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
In Argentina SME turn out to be a major player in the economic and social environment, representing more than 90% of the total registered companies, and being the country's largest employer, surpassing the 60% of formal registered employees. However, a comparative analysis between the last two national censuses -2004 and 2014- shows an industrial decline with respect to large companies, highlighting a substantial deterioration in its economic growth and envisaging the need to work on their structural competitiveness. Consequently, SME require a special focus of attention in order to sustain their activity, working on competitive aspects in order to enhance employees' performance levels, for example, by implementing simple Performance Evaluation (PE) tools that can be used to professionalize their organization and, ultimately, help to sustain their structural competitiveness. The hypothesis of this study -which was corroborated- suggests that a simple PE tool, based on Administration By Objectives (ABO) can provide with significant benefits in terms of HR management while improving Argentinean SME structural competitiveness. It was used a quali-quantitative methodology, with a qualitative predominance. The study was exploratory and descriptive, with a not experimental and transversal design.
引用
收藏
页码:360 / 379
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] HR/V'O2 and HR/V'CO2 slope: new tools for CPET evaluation?
    Mirabelli, Flavio Marco
    Morviducci, Matteo
    Panza, Luigi
    Piamonti, Daniel
    Flore, Roberto
    Lo Muzio, Giulia
    Lecci, Altea
    Angelone, Dario
    Palange, Paolo
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2023, 62
  • [32] The Performance Evaluation of a Website using Automated Evaluation Tools
    Kwangsawad, Achaporn
    Jattamart, Aungkana
    Nusawat, Paingruthai
    2019 4TH TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION MANAGEMENT AND ENGINEERING SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE (TIMES-ICON), 2019,
  • [33] Measuring SME performance
    Hall, Peter
    Manufacturing Engineer, 2002, 81 (03) : 113 - 115
  • [34] USAGE OF AHP METHOD FOR EVALUATION OF E-COMMERCE TOOLS FOR DISTANCE LEARNING FOR SME IN LATVIA
    Gudele, Ina
    10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION (ICERI2017), 2017, : 8934 - 8939
  • [35] What Is the Impact of Digital Tools on Hospitality Business Performance? The Case of SME Accommodation Sector in Portugal
    Lopes, Joao M.
    Gomes, Sofia
    Ferreira, Joao J.
    Ferreira, Luis
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TOURISM RESEARCH, 2025, 27 (01)
  • [36] Evaluation of a social cognitive model of academic performance in mathematics in an adolescent Argentinean sample
    Cupani, Marcos
    Lorenzo, Jorge
    INFANCIA Y APRENDIZAJE, 2010, 33 (01): : 63 - 74
  • [37] Truck performance on Argentinean highways
    Archilla, Adrian Ricardo
    Fernandez de Cieza, Aristides Osvaldo
    Transportation Research Record, 1996, (1555): : 114 - 123
  • [38] <hr>Performance evaluation of concurrent supply chain resilience strategies
    Alikhani, Reza
    Ranjbar, Amirhossein
    Torabi, S. Ali
    Zobel, Christopher W.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2025, 279
  • [39] KEY FACTORS OF INFLUENCE OF SME OWNERS ON SUCCESSFULL AUTOMATION OF HR PROCESSES
    Damnjanovic, Aleksandar M.
    Kolev, Dragan
    Jankovic, Dusan M.
    CASOPIS ZA EKONOMIJU I TRZISNE KOMUNIKACIJE, 2024, 14 (02): : 699 - 710
  • [40] Modelling techniques and tools for computer performance evaluation
    Field, T
    Harrison, P
    Bradley, J
    Harder, U
    PERFORMANCE EVALUATION, 2003, 54 (02) : 77 - 78