The rural-urban income divide among farm households: the role of off-farm work and farm size

被引:2
|
作者
El-Osta, Hisham S. [1 ]
机构
[1] USDA, Econ Res Serv, Washington, DC 20024 USA
关键词
Income; Quantile regression; Agricultural resource management survey; Counterfactual income distribution;
D O I
10.1108/AFR-12-2018-0106
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Purpose The determinants of income of rural and urban farm households, with emphasis on the role of off-farm employment by farm household members and of farm size, are examined using data from the 2016 Agricultural Resource Management Survey (ARMS) and quantile regression procedure. The implemented quantile regression technique is extended to allow for the decomposition of the income gap between the two groups of farm households. Findings indicate, regardless of the location of the farm, a positive and significant impact of a previous year's participation in off-farm work by household members on the distribution of current household income. Having operated a larger-sized farm in the previous year is shown with a similar effect in the upper range of the income distribution for urban households and with a comparable impact but across the whole income distribution for rural farm households. Design/methodology/approach Data from the 2016 ARMS are used in conjunction with quantile regression in order for decomposition of the income gap between the two groups of farm households. Findings Findings show that urban farm households who in a previous year have participated in off-farm work and operated larger-sized farms tend to earn higher incomes. Results further indicate higher rates of return to education for "urban" farm households in comparison to "rural" farm households, particularly for those with a college education and beyond who are at the lower portion of the income distribution. Social implications The results of a higher rate of return to education for "urban" farm households in comparison to "rural" farm households have important policy implications for policymakers. Originality/value This is the first paper in the agricultural economic literature that implements a method of assessing the rural-urban divide across all of the quantiles of income distribution.
引用
收藏
页码:453 / 470
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] FARM AND OFF-FARM LABOR - A CROSS-SECTIONAL ANALYSIS OF IOWA FARM HOUSEHOLDS
    LANGE, MD
    HUFFMAN, WE
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1980, 62 (05) : 1107 - 1107
  • [32] Off-farm work participation, off-farm labor supply, and on-farm labor demand of US farm operators.
    Huffman, WE
    El-Osta, H
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1998, 80 (05) : 1180 - 1180
  • [33] Education and off-farm work
    Yang, DT
    ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND CULTURAL CHANGE, 1997, 45 (03) : 613 - 632
  • [34] Is off-farm income reforming the farm? Evidence from Mexico
    Pfeiffer, Lisa
    Lopez-Feldman, Alejandro
    Taylor, J. Edward
    AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 40 (02) : 125 - 138
  • [35] OFF-FARM INCOME OF NORTH-DAKOTA FARM FAMILIES
    LEISTRITZ, FL
    EKSTROM, BL
    VREUGDENHIL, HG
    LEHOLM, AG
    NORTH DAKOTA FARM RESEARCH, 1986, 43 (04): : 39 - 45
  • [36] Road Expansion and Off-Farm Work in Rural China
    Qiao, Fangbin
    Rozelle, Scott
    Huang, Jikun
    Zhang, Linxiu
    Luo, Renfu
    CHINA QUARTERLY, 2014, 218 : 428 - 451
  • [37] Off-farm work decisions of farm couples and land transfer choices in rural China
    Zhou, Xiaoshi
    Ma, Wanglin
    Renwick, Alan
    Li, Gucheng
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2020, 52 (57) : 6229 - 6247
  • [38] Off-farm jobs and on-farm work in periods of boom and bust in rural China
    Zhang, LX
    Rozelle, S
    Huang, JK
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE ECONOMICS, 2001, 29 (03) : 505 - 526
  • [39] FARM SIZE, FARM-LABOR, AND OFF-FARM LABOR - A SIMULTANEOUS ESTIMATION
    HUFFMAN, WE
    LANGE, MD
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1982, 64 (05) : 1091 - 1091
  • [40] Family composition and off-farm participation decisions in Israeli farm households
    Kimhi, A
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2004, 86 (02) : 502 - 512