Complexity and power in case-control association studies

被引:83
|
作者
Longmate, JA
机构
[1] City Hope Natl Med Ctr, Dept Biostat, Duarte, CA 91010 USA
[2] Beckman Res Inst, Duarte, CA 91010 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1086/320106
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
A general method is described for estimation of the power and sample size of studies relating a dichotomous phenotype to multiple interacting loci and environmental covariates. Either a simple case-control design or more complex stratified sampling may be used. The method can be used to design individual studies, to evaluate the power of alternative test statistics for complex traits, and to examine general questions of study design through explicit scenarios. The method is used here to study how the power of association tests is affected by problems of allelic heterogeneity and to investigate the potential role for collective testing of sets of related candidate genes in the presence of locus heterogeneity. The results indicate that allele-discovery efforts are crucial and that omnibus tests or collective testing of alleles can be substantially more powerful than separate testing of individual allelic variants. Joint testing of multiple candidate loci can also dramatically improve power, despite model misspecification and inclusion of irrelevant loci, but requires an a priori hypothesis defining the set of loci to investigate.
引用
收藏
页码:1229 / 1237
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Robust tests for matched case-control genetic association studies
    Zang, Yong
    Fung, Wing Kam
    BMC GENETICS, 2010, 11
  • [42] Genome association studies of complex diseases by case-control designs
    Fan, RZ
    Knapp, M
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2003, 72 (04) : 850 - 868
  • [43] Unified Analysis of Secondary Traits in Case-Control Association Studies
    Ghosh, Arpita
    Wright, Fred A.
    Zou, Fei
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2013, 108 (502) : 566 - 576
  • [45] Case-control association studies in complex traits - The end of an era?
    Paterson, A
    MOLECULAR PSYCHIATRY, 1997, 2 (04) : 277 - 278
  • [46] Analysis of Case-Control Association Studies: SNPs, Imputation and Haplotypes
    Chatterjee, Nilanjan
    Chen, Yi-Hau
    Luo, Sheng
    Carroll, Raymond J.
    STATISTICAL SCIENCE, 2009, 24 (04) : 489 - 502
  • [47] Testing for population subdivision and association in four case-control studies
    Ardlie, KG
    Lunetta, KL
    Seielstad, M
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2002, 71 (02) : 304 - 311
  • [48] Bayesian inference for epistasis association mapping in case-control studies
    Zhou, Zhihui
    Liu, Guixia
    Su, Lingtao
    Tian, Yuan
    ICIC Express Letters, 2015, 9 (01): : 261 - 268
  • [49] Analysis of case-control association studies with known risk variants
    Zaitlen, Noah
    Pasaniuc, Bogdan
    Patterson, Nick
    Pollack, Samuela
    Voight, Benjamin
    Groop, Leif
    Altshuler, David
    Henderson, Brian E.
    Kolonel, Laurence N.
    Le Marchand, Loic
    Waters, Kevin
    Haiman, Christopher A.
    Stranger, Barbara E.
    Dermitzakis, Emmanouil T.
    Kraft, Peter
    Price, Alkes L.
    BIOINFORMATICS, 2012, 28 (13) : 1729 - 1737
  • [50] Genetic case-control association studies - correcting for multiple testing
    Nyholt, DR
    HUMAN GENETICS, 2001, 109 (05) : 564 - 565