Statistical controversies in clinical research: data access and sharing-can we be more transparent about clinical research? Let's do what's right for patients

被引:3
|
作者
Rockhold, F. W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Duke Clin Res Inst, Dept Biostat & Bioinformat, POB 17969, Durham, NC 27715 USA
关键词
open science; transparency; data sharing; data access; TRIAL REGISTRATION; PROJECT; EDITORS;
D O I
10.1093/annonc/mdx123
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Calls for greater transparency and 'open data access' in clinical research are widespread, from sources including the Executive Office of the President, which in 2013 called for increased access to the results of federally funded research. In 2015, The Institute of Medicine issued a report advocating for a multi-stakeholder effort to foster responsible data sharing, and there are many others. Open science is good for researchers, good for innovation, and good for patients. The question at the center of the open-science efforts for clinical trials should not be whether data should be shared, but rather how we can usher in responsible methods for doing so. Unfortunately, there remain numerous perceived barriers to complete transparency around clinical trial data. This paper reviews the current status of data disclosure, the barriers to achieving it and a suggestion for the future.
引用
收藏
页码:1734 / 1737
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] What are we trying to do when we write about the psychoanalytic interaction? The relevance of theory and research to clinical responsiveness - Reply to commentaries
    Knoblauch, SH
    PSYCHOANALYTIC DIALOGUES, 2005, 15 (06) : 883 - 896
  • [22] Translating basic research into clinical practice or what else do we have to learn about olfactory ensheathing cells?
    Radtke, Christine
    Wewetzer, Konstantin
    NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2009, 456 (03) : 133 - 136
  • [23] WHAT DO YOUNG PEOPLE THINK ABOUT CONTINUOUS DATA COLLECTION IN CLINICAL RESEARCH AND THE TYPES OF ELECTRONIC DEVICES?
    Lunt, Laura
    Shoop-Worrall, Stephanie
    Khanom, Sonia
    Bolger, Imogen
    Fantana, Antoniu L.
    Short, Mary A.
    Mcdonagh, Janet
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2019, 78 : 225 - 226
  • [24] What's it got to do with the Brain? Mobilising and Doing Clinical Relevance in Epigenetic Psychiatric Research
    Samaras, Georgia
    Mueller, Ruth
    MINERVA, 2025,
  • [26] Have Clinical Ethicists Been Complicit With the Marginalization of Abortion and What Can We Do to Improve Patient's Rights?
    Spike, Jeffrey P.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2022, 22 (08): : 54 - 56
  • [27] Of arts, leadership, management education, and management research: A commentary on Nancy Adler's "The arts & leadership: Now that we can do anything, what will we do?"
    Tung, Rosalie L.
    ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT LEARNING & EDUCATION, 2006, 5 (04) : 505 - 511
  • [28] Iran's research prioritization: Are we meeting the goals? A study based on clinical trial registry data
    Fakhri, Farshid
    Mohammadi, Mohammad
    Eybpoosh, Sana
    Ahmadi, Sharareh
    Solaymani-Dodaran, Masoud
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (04):
  • [29] Evidence summary: what do we know from qualitative research about people's care-seeking about oral health?
    Fox, Chris
    BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2010, 209 (05) : 225 - 231
  • [30] HOW DO WE KNOW IT'S GOOD? - A WORKSHOP ON QUALITY CRITERIA IN QUALITATIVE SOCIAL AND CLINICAL PHARMACY RESEARCH
    Sporrong, Sofia Kalvemark
    Kaae, Susanne
    Norgaard, Lotte Stig
    Druedahl, Louise
    Amin, Mohamed
    RESEARCH IN SOCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE PHARMACY, 2019, 15 (12): : E54 - E54