Development and validation of a frailty index compatible with three interRAI assessment instruments

被引:9
|
作者
Abey-Nesbit, Rebecca [1 ]
Bergler, Ulrich [1 ]
Pickering, John W. [1 ]
Nishtala, Prasad S. [2 ]
Jamieson, Hamish [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Otago, Dept Med, Christchurch, New Zealand
[2] Univ Bath, Ctr Therapeut Innovat, Dept Pharm & Pharmacol, Bath, Avon, England
关键词
frailty; frailty index; aged care; international Residential Assessment Instrument assessments (interRAI); geriatric assessment; older people; ACCUMULATION; ALLOCATION;
D O I
10.1093/ageing/afac178
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Background a Frailty Index (FI) calculated by the accumulation of deficits is often used to quantify the extent of frailty in individuals in specific settings. This study aimed to derive a FI that can be applied across three standardised international Residential Assessment Instrument assessments (interRAI), used at different stages of ageing and the corresponding increase in support needs. Methods deficit items common to the interRAI Contact Assessment (CA), Home Care (HC) or Long-Term Care Facilities assessment (LTCF) were identified and recoded to form a cumulative deficit FI. The index was validated using a large dataset of needs assessments of older people in New Zealand against mortality prediction using Kaplan Meier curves and logistic regression models. The index was further validated by comparing its performance with a previously validated index in the HC cohort. Results the index comprised 15 questions across seven domains. The assessment cohort and their mean frailty (SD) were: 89,506 CA with 0.26 (0.15), 151,270 HC with 0.36 (0.15) and 83,473 LTCF with 0.41 (0.17). The index predicted 1-year mortality for each of the CA, HC and LTCF, cohorts with area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of 0.741 (95% confidence interval, CI: 0.718-0.762), 0.687 (95%CI: 0.684-0.690) and 0.674 (95%CI: 0.670-0.678), respectively. Conclusions the results for this multi-instrument FI are congruent with the differences in frailty expected for people in the target settings for these instruments and appropriately associated with mortality at each stage of the journey of progressive ageing.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Development and test of integrated assessment instruments for older Koreans with long-term care needs using the interRAI suite
    Kim, H.
    Jung, Y.
    Sung, M.
    Lee, J.
    Yoon, J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED CARE, 2013, 13
  • [42] Assessment of oral health in older adults by non-dental professional caregivers—development and validation of a photograph-supported oral health–related section for the interRAI suite of instruments
    Stefanie Krausch-Hofmann
    Trung Dung Tran
    Barbara Janssens
    Dominique Declerck
    Emmanuel Lesaffre
    Johanna de Almeida Mello
    Anja Declercq
    Jan De Lepeleire
    Joke Duyck
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2021, 25 : 3475 - 3486
  • [43] The Parent Concerns Questionnaire and Parenting Stress Index: comparison of two Common Assessment Framework-compatible assessment instruments
    Sheppard, Michael
    McDonald, Paula
    Welbourne, Penelope
    CHILD & FAMILY SOCIAL WORK, 2010, 15 (03) : 345 - 356
  • [44] The biological index of frailty: A new index for the assessment of frailty in human skeletal remains
    Zedda, Nicoletta
    Bramanti, Barbara
    Gualdi-Russo, Emanuela
    Ceraico, Elena
    Rinaldo, Natascia
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY, 2021, 176 (03) : 459 - 473
  • [45] Wish to Die in Older Patients: Development and Validation of Two Assessment Instruments
    Duerst, Anne-Veronique
    Spencer, Brenda
    Bula, Christophe
    Fustinoni, Sarah
    Mazzocato, Claudia
    Rochat, Etienne
    Truchard, Eve Rubli
    Monod, Stefanie
    Jox, Ralf J.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2020, 68 (06) : 1202 - 1209
  • [46] An interRAI-derived frailty index is associated with prior hospitalisations in older adults residing in retirement villages
    Bloomfield, Katherine
    Wu, Zhenqiang
    Tatton, Annie
    Calvert, Cheryl
    Peel, Nancye
    Hubbard, Ruth
    Jamieson, Hamish
    Hikaka, Joanna
    Boyd, Michal
    Bramley, Dale
    Connolly, Martin J.
    AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL ON AGEING, 2021, 40 (01) : 66 - 71
  • [47] Response to the Letter to the Editor: "What Is Missing in the Validation of Frailty Instruments?"
    Cesari, Matteo
    Vellas, Bruno
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION, 2014, 15 (02) : 143 - 144
  • [48] CONSTRUCTION AND VALIDATION OF A FRAILTY INDEX IN PRIMARY CARE IN ITALY: THE HEALTH-SEARCH FRAILTY INDEX
    Vetrano, Davide
    Zucchelli, Alberto
    Onder, Graziano
    Bernabei, Roberto
    Fratiglioni, Laura
    Marengoni, Alessandra
    Lapi, Francesco
    INNOVATION IN AGING, 2021, 5 : 531 - 531
  • [49] Development and validation of a Frailty Index in Australia (FI-Aus) using routine aged care eligibility assessment record data
    Khadka, J.
    Visvanathan, R.
    Theou, O.
    Wesselingh, S.
    Inacio, M.
    AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL ON AGEING, 2019, 38 : 21 - 21
  • [50] Correction to: Assessment of oral health in older adults by non-dental professional caregivers—development and validation of a photograph-supported oral health–related section for the interRAI suite of instruments
    Stefanie Krausch-Hofmann
    Trung Dung Tran
    Barbara Janssens
    Dominique Declerck
    Emmanuel Lesaffre
    Johanna de Almeida Mello
    Anja Declercq
    Jan De Lepeleire
    Joke Duyck
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2021, 25 : 5125 - 5125