共 50 条
Development and validation of a frailty index compatible with three interRAI assessment instruments
被引:9
|作者:
Abey-Nesbit, Rebecca
[1
]
Bergler, Ulrich
[1
]
Pickering, John W.
[1
]
Nishtala, Prasad S.
[2
]
Jamieson, Hamish
[1
]
机构:
[1] Univ Otago, Dept Med, Christchurch, New Zealand
[2] Univ Bath, Ctr Therapeut Innovat, Dept Pharm & Pharmacol, Bath, Avon, England
关键词:
frailty;
frailty index;
aged care;
international Residential Assessment Instrument assessments (interRAI);
geriatric assessment;
older people;
ACCUMULATION;
ALLOCATION;
D O I:
10.1093/ageing/afac178
中图分类号:
R592 [老年病学];
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号:
03 ;
0303 ;
100203 ;
摘要:
Background a Frailty Index (FI) calculated by the accumulation of deficits is often used to quantify the extent of frailty in individuals in specific settings. This study aimed to derive a FI that can be applied across three standardised international Residential Assessment Instrument assessments (interRAI), used at different stages of ageing and the corresponding increase in support needs. Methods deficit items common to the interRAI Contact Assessment (CA), Home Care (HC) or Long-Term Care Facilities assessment (LTCF) were identified and recoded to form a cumulative deficit FI. The index was validated using a large dataset of needs assessments of older people in New Zealand against mortality prediction using Kaplan Meier curves and logistic regression models. The index was further validated by comparing its performance with a previously validated index in the HC cohort. Results the index comprised 15 questions across seven domains. The assessment cohort and their mean frailty (SD) were: 89,506 CA with 0.26 (0.15), 151,270 HC with 0.36 (0.15) and 83,473 LTCF with 0.41 (0.17). The index predicted 1-year mortality for each of the CA, HC and LTCF, cohorts with area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of 0.741 (95% confidence interval, CI: 0.718-0.762), 0.687 (95%CI: 0.684-0.690) and 0.674 (95%CI: 0.670-0.678), respectively. Conclusions the results for this multi-instrument FI are congruent with the differences in frailty expected for people in the target settings for these instruments and appropriately associated with mortality at each stage of the journey of progressive ageing.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文