Diversion evaluations: a specialized forensic examination

被引:5
|
作者
Barber-Rioja, Virginia [1 ]
Rotter, Merrill [2 ]
Schombs, Faith [3 ]
机构
[1] NYU, New York City Hlth & Hosp, Correct Hlth Serv, 92 South Oxford St,Apt 2, Brooklyn, NY 11217 USA
[2] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[3] UCL, London, England
关键词
MENTAL-HEALTH COURTS; RISK; OFFENDERS; JURISPRUDENCE; RECIDIVISM; DISORDERS; VOLUNTARY; ILLNESS; JUSTICE; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1002/bsl.2309
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Diversion programs screen justice-involved individuals for the presence of psychiatric disorders, and after negotiations take place with attorneys and treatment providers, these programs link participants with community-based treatment programs in lieu of incarceration. As the number of diversion programs, including mental health courts, continues to rapidly grow, so does the need for diversion evaluations. Diversion evaluations are a type of forensic mental health assessment (FMHA) conducted to assist the courts in making decisions regarding diversion eligibility. As a result, they should follow the general principles of FMHA and the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law Practice Guideline for Forensic Assessment. Diversion evaluations also require application of specific areas of knowledge and experience, as court-based diversion is a unique, therapeutically focused context that is purposefully non-adversarial. The diversion evaluator is a role that combines objective decision-making with clinical consultation. The purpose of this article is to apply generally accepted forensic report standards to diversion evaluations, with a particular focus on the unique issues of diversion-specific forensic evaluations.
引用
收藏
页码:418 / 430
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Neuropathological examination in forensic context
    Kalimo, H
    Saukko, P
    Graham, D
    FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 146 (2-3) : 73 - 81
  • [42] FORENSIC EXAMINATION OF TYPEWRITING TODAY
    FRYD, CFM
    MEDICINE SCIENCE AND THE LAW, 1974, 14 (04) : 237 - 242
  • [43] A Forensic Examination of Court Reports
    Goodman-Delahunty, Jane
    Dhami, Mandeep K.
    AUSTRALIAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2013, 48 (01) : 32 - 40
  • [44] The Forensic Examination of Tool Marks
    Vojir, Miha
    REVIJA ZA KRIMINALISTIKO IN KRIMINOLOGIJO, 2020, 71 (02): : 127 - 138
  • [45] Characteristics of Older Defendants Referred for Forensic Evaluations
    Friedman, Susan Hatters
    Competente, Boaz
    Skipworth, Jeremy
    Worrall, Richard
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PSYCHIATRY AND THE LAW, 2022, 50 (03): : 405 - 415
  • [46] Practice Parameter for Child and Adolescent Forensic Evaluations
    不详
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2011, 50 (12): : 1299 - 1312
  • [47] FORENSIC EVALUATIONS IN IMMIGRATION CASES - EVOLVING ISSUES
    FRUMKIN, IB
    FRIEDLAND, J
    BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES & THE LAW, 1995, 13 (04) : 477 - 489
  • [48] Use of video conferencing for psychiatric and forensic evaluations
    Lexcen, FJ
    Hawk, GL
    Herrick, S
    Blank, MB
    PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, 2006, 57 (05) : 713 - 715
  • [49] Gendered Borders: Forensic Evaluations of Immigrant Women
    de las Fuentes, Cynthia
    Duffer, Martha Ramos
    Vasquez, Melba J. T.
    WOMEN & THERAPY, 2013, 36 (3-4) : 302 - 318
  • [50] Reliability of repeated forensic evaluations of legal sanity
    Kacperska, Iwona
    Heitzman, Janusz
    Bak, Tomasz
    Lesko, Anna Walczyna
    Opio, Malgorzata
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW AND PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 44 : 24 - 29