Diversion evaluations: a specialized forensic examination

被引:5
|
作者
Barber-Rioja, Virginia [1 ]
Rotter, Merrill [2 ]
Schombs, Faith [3 ]
机构
[1] NYU, New York City Hlth & Hosp, Correct Hlth Serv, 92 South Oxford St,Apt 2, Brooklyn, NY 11217 USA
[2] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[3] UCL, London, England
关键词
MENTAL-HEALTH COURTS; RISK; OFFENDERS; JURISPRUDENCE; RECIDIVISM; DISORDERS; VOLUNTARY; ILLNESS; JUSTICE; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1002/bsl.2309
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Diversion programs screen justice-involved individuals for the presence of psychiatric disorders, and after negotiations take place with attorneys and treatment providers, these programs link participants with community-based treatment programs in lieu of incarceration. As the number of diversion programs, including mental health courts, continues to rapidly grow, so does the need for diversion evaluations. Diversion evaluations are a type of forensic mental health assessment (FMHA) conducted to assist the courts in making decisions regarding diversion eligibility. As a result, they should follow the general principles of FMHA and the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law Practice Guideline for Forensic Assessment. Diversion evaluations also require application of specific areas of knowledge and experience, as court-based diversion is a unique, therapeutically focused context that is purposefully non-adversarial. The diversion evaluator is a role that combines objective decision-making with clinical consultation. The purpose of this article is to apply generally accepted forensic report standards to diversion evaluations, with a particular focus on the unique issues of diversion-specific forensic evaluations.
引用
收藏
页码:418 / 430
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Postmortem examination at crematories: experiences and forensic medical evaluations
    Schroeder, Ann Sophie
    Pueschel, Klaus
    BUNDESGESUNDHEITSBLATT-GESUNDHEITSFORSCHUNG-GESUNDHEITSSCHUTZ, 2019, 62 (12) : 1438 - 1445
  • [2] Forensic evaluations in psychiatry
    Chadda, R. K.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2013, 55 (04) : 393 - 399
  • [3] Distractions in Forensic Evaluations
    Brodsky, Stanley L.
    Johnson, Lauren N.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PSYCHIATRY AND THE LAW, 2019, 47 (03): : 360 - 364
  • [4] PROBLEMS OF FORENSIC EVALUATIONS
    STEINKE
    KRIMINALISTIK, 1986, (03): : 163 - 165
  • [5] Krematoriumsleichenschau: Erfahrungen und rechtsmedizinische AuswertungenPostmortem examination at crematories: experiences and forensic medical evaluations
    Ann Sophie Schröder
    Klaus Püschel
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz, 2019, 62 : 1438 - 1445
  • [6] Forensic Neurology and the Role of Neurologists in Forensic Evaluations
    Wortzel, Hal S.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PSYCHIATRY AND THE LAW, 2024, 52 (02): : 149 - 152
  • [7] Forensic examination
    不详
    MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2000, 122 (06) : 78 - 80
  • [8] How Cross-Examination on Subjectivity and Bias Affects Jurors' Evaluations of Forensic Science Evidence
    Thompson, William C.
    Scurich, Nicholas
    JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES, 2019, 64 (05) : 1379 - 1388
  • [9] Forensic evaluations at the time of arrest
    Dreisbach, VM
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PSYCHIATRY AND THE LAW, 2002, 30 (01): : 178 - 182
  • [10] Equivocal Findings in Forensic Evaluations
    Coffey, C. Adam
    Brodsky, Stanley L.
    Parrott, Caroline T.
    Avila, Andrea
    PSYCHOLOGY PUBLIC POLICY AND LAW, 2023, 29 (02) : 145 - 153