Minimally Invasive Image-Guided Gut Transport Function Measurement Probe

被引:0
|
作者
Otuya, David O. [1 ,2 ]
Gavgiotaki, Evangelia [1 ,2 ]
Carlson, Camella J. [1 ]
Shi, Serena Q. [3 ]
Lee, Ariel J. [4 ]
Krall, Alexander A. [1 ]
Chung, Anita [1 ]
Grant, Catriona G. [1 ]
Bhat, Nitasha M. [1 ]
Choy, Peter [1 ]
Giddings, Sarah L. [1 ]
Gardecki, Joseph A. [1 ,2 ]
Thiagarajah, Jay R. [2 ,5 ]
Rowe, Steven M. [6 ,7 ]
Tearney, Guillermo J. [1 ,2 ,8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Wellman Ctr Photomed, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Univ Penn, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[4] Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol, Daejeon, South Korea
[5] Boston Childrens Hosp, Div Gastroenterol Hepatol & Nutr, Boston, MA USA
[6] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Med, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[7] Gregory Fleming James Cyst Fibrosis Res Ctr, Birmingham, AL USA
[8] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Pathol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[9] Harvard MIT Div Hlth Sci & Technol HST, Boston, MA 02115 USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN PHYSICS | 2021年 / 9卷 / 09期
关键词
intestinal permeability; gut potential difference; transnasal probe; m-mode OCT imaging; duodenum diagnosis; MEASURING INTESTINAL PERMEABILITY; ELECTRICAL POTENTIAL DIFFERENCE; TIGHT JUNCTIONS; CELIAC-DISEASE; BARRIER; MULTICENTER; DYSFUNCTION; MODEL;
D O I
10.3389/fphy.2021.735645
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
Introduction: Diseases such as celiac disease, environmental enteric dysfunction, infectious gastroenteritis, type II diabetes and inflammatory bowel disease are associated with increased gut permeability. Dual sugar absorption tests, such as the lactulose to rhamnose ratio (L:R) test, are the current standard for measuring gut permeability. Although easy to administer in adults, the L:R test has a number of drawbacks. These include an inability to assess for spatial heterogeneity in gut permeability that may distinguish different disease severity or pathology, additional sample collection for immunoassays, and challenges in carrying out the test in certain populations such as infants and small children. Here, we demonstrate a minimally invasive probe for real-time localized gut permeability evaluation through gut potential difference (GPD) measurement. Materials and Methods: The probe has an outer diameter of 1.2 mm diameter and can be deployed in the gut of unsedated subjects via a transnasal introduction tube (TNIT) that is akin to an intestinal feeding tube. The GPD probe consists of an Ag/AgCl electrode, an optical probe and a perfusion channel all housed within a transparent sheath. Lactated Ringer's (LR) solution is pumped through the perfusion channel to provide ionic contact between the electrodes and the gut lining. The optical probe captures non-scanning (M-mode) OCT images to confirm electrode contact with the gut lining. A separate skin patch probe is placed over an abraded skin area to provide reference for the GPD measurements. Swine studies were conducted to validate the GPD probe. GPD in the duodenum was modulated by perfusing 45 ml of 45 mM glucose. Results: GPD values of -13.1 +/- 2.8 mV were measured in the duodenum across four swine studies. The change in GPD in the duodenum with the addition of glucose was -10.5 +/- 2.4 mV (p < 0.001). M-mode OCT images provided electrode-tissue contact information, which was vital in ascertaining the probe's proximity to the gut mucosa. Conclusion: We developed and demonstrated a minimally invasive method for investigating gastrointestinal permeability consisting of an image guided GPD probe that can be used in unsedated subjects.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Image-guided ultrafast laser scalpel for precise and minimally invasive surgery
    Ben-Yakar, Adela
    2013 CONFERENCE ON LASERS AND ELECTRO-OPTICS (CLEO), 2013,
  • [22] Software architecture for robotically assisted and image-guided minimally invasive interventions
    Cleary, K
    Patriciu, A
    Xu, S
    Mocanu, M
    Stoianovici, D
    CARS 2002: COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOLOGY AND SURGERY, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 218 - 223
  • [23] Image-guided therapy and minimally invasive surgery in children: a merging future
    Shlomovitz, E
    Amaral, JG
    Chait, PG
    PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2006, 36 (05) : 398 - 404
  • [24] Forces and Trauma Associated with Minimally Invasive Image-Guided Cochlear Implantation
    Rohani, Pooyan
    Pile, Jason
    Kahrs, Lueder A.
    Balachandran, Ramya
    Blachon, Gregoire S.
    Simaan, Nabil
    Labadie, Robert F.
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2014, 150 (04) : 638 - 645
  • [25] Minimally invasive procedures - Interventional MR image-guided functional neurosurgery
    Chu, RM
    Tummala, RP
    Kucharczyk, J
    Truwit, CL
    Maxwell, RE
    NEUROIMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2001, 11 (04) : 715 - +
  • [26] Revision surgery following minimally invasive image-guided cochlear implantation
    Morrel, William G.
    Jayawardena, Asitha D. L.
    Amberg, Susan M.
    Dawant, Benoit M.
    Noble, Jack H.
    Labadie, Robert F.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2019, 129 (06): : 1458 - 1461
  • [27] Feasibility of Image-Guided Minimally Invasive Therapies in Pediatric Liver Tumors
    Shaikh, R.
    PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2018, 65 : S367 - S367
  • [28] Minimally invasive image-guided therapy of primary and metastatic pancreatic cancer
    Bibok, Andras
    Kim, Dae Won
    Malafa, Mokenge
    Kis, Bela
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 27 (27) : 4322 - 4341
  • [29] Image-guided minimally invasive treatment for small renal cell carcinoma
    Krokidis, Miltiadis E.
    Kitrou, Panagiotis
    Spiliopoulos, Stavros
    Karnabatidis, Dimitrios
    Katsanos, Konstantinos
    INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING, 2018, 9 (03): : 385 - 390
  • [30] Minimally Invasive Image-Guided Percutaneous Irreversible Electroporation of Adrenal Metastases
    Narayanan, Govindarajan
    Gentile, Nicole T.
    Gu, Khloe
    Schiro, Brian J.
    Gandhi, Ripal T.
    Pena, Costantino S.
    Dijkstra, Madelon
    CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2025, 48 (01) : 77 - 83