Influence of Audibility and Distortion on Recognition of Reverberant Speech for Children and Adults with Hearing Aid Amplification

被引:2
|
作者
Brennan, Marc A. [1 ]
McCreery, Ryan W. [2 ]
Massey, John [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska, Dept Special Educ & Commun Disorders, Lincoln, NE 68588 USA
[2] Boys Town Natl Res Hosp, Ctr Hearing Res, Omaha, NE 68131 USA
[3] Silverstein Inst, Florida Ear & Sinus Ctr, Sarasota, FL USA
关键词
hearing loss; hearing aids; speech perception; adults and children; DYNAMIC-RANGE COMPRESSION; FAST-ACTING COMPRESSION; RELEASE TIME; MULTICHANNEL COMPRESSION; AMPLITUDE-COMPRESSION; CONSONANT RECOGNITION; INTELLIGIBILITY; PERCEPTION; NOISE; LISTENERS;
D O I
10.1055/a-1678-3381
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Background Adults and children with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) have trouble understanding speech in rooms with reverberation when using hearing aid amplification. While the use of amplitude compression signal processing in hearing aids may contribute to this difficulty, there is conflicting evidence on the effects of amplitude compression settings on speech recognition. Less clear is the effect of a fast release time for adults and children with SNHL when using compression ratios derived from a prescriptive procedure. Purpose The aim of the study is to determine whether release time impacts speech recognition in reverberation for children and adults with SNHL and to determine if these effects of release time and reverberation can be predicted using indices of audibility or temporal and spectral distortion. Research Design This is a quasi-experimental cohort study. Participants used a hearing aid simulator set to the Desired Sensation Level algorithm m[i/o] for three different amplitude compression release times. Reverberation was simulated using three different reverberation times. Participants Participants were 20 children and 16 adults with SNHL. Data Collection and Analyses Participants were seated in a sound-attenuating booth and then nonsense syllable recognition was measured. Predictions of speech recognition were made using indices of audibility, temporal distortion, and spectral distortion and the effects of release time and reverberation were analyzed using linear mixed models. Results While nonsense syllable recognition decreased in reverberation release time did not significantly affect nonsense syllable recognition. Participants with lower audibility were more susceptible to the negative effect of reverberation on nonsense syllable recognition. Conclusion We have extended previous work on the effects of reverberation on aided speech recognition to children with SNHL. Variations in release time did not impact the understanding of speech. An index of audibility best predicted nonsense syllable recognition in reverberation and, clinically, these results suggest that patients with less audibility are more susceptible to nonsense syllable recognition in reverberation.
引用
收藏
页码:170 / 180
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effect of Hearing Aid Bandwidth on Speech Recognition Performance of Listeners Using a Cochlear Implant and Contralateral Hearing Aid (Bimodal Hearing)
    Neuman, Arlene C.
    Svirsky, Mario A.
    EAR AND HEARING, 2013, 34 (05): : 553 - 561
  • [32] Consistency of hearing aid use, speech perception and vocabulary in hearing impaired children
    dos Santos, Marina Marques
    Pereira, Regiane Silva
    Mendes, Beatriz de Castro Andrade
    Novaes, Beatriz Calvacanti de Albuquerque Caiuby
    CODAS, 2024, 36 (06):
  • [33] The relation between stimulus context, speech audibility, and perception far normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children
    Stelmachowicz, PG
    Hoover, BM
    Lewis, DE
    Kortekaas, RWL
    Pittman, AL
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2000, 43 (04): : 902 - 914
  • [34] The importance of high-frequency audibility with and without visual cues on speech recognition for listeners with normal hearing
    Silberer, Amanda B.
    Bentler, Ruth
    Wu, Yu-Hsiang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2015, 54 (11) : 865 - 872
  • [35] Speech recognition, speech production and speech intelligibility in children with hearing aids versus implanted children
    Löhle, S
    Frischmuth, S
    Holm, M
    Becker, L
    Flamm, K
    Laszig, R
    Beck, C
    Lehnhardt, E
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 1999, 47 (02) : 165 - 169
  • [36] Hearing aid fitting and developmental outcomes of children fit according to either the NAL or DSL prescription: fit-to-target, audibility, speech and language abilities
    Ching, Teresa Y. C.
    Zhang, Vicky W.
    Johnson, Earl E.
    Van Buynder, Patricia
    Hou, Sanna
    Burns, Lauren
    Button, Laura
    Flynn, Christopher
    McGhie, Karen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2018, 57 : S41 - S54
  • [37] APPLICATION OF A SPEECH TRAINING AID FOR HEARING-IMPAIRED CHILDREN
    ISHIBASHI, I
    SAKUMA, R
    IMAI, H
    FOLIA PHONIATRICA, 1986, 38 (5-6): : 309 - 309
  • [38] Improving hearing-aid gains based on automatic speech recognition
    Fontan, Lionel
    Le Coz, Maxime
    Azzopardi, Charlotte
    Stone, Michael A.
    Fuellgrabe, Christian
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2020, 148 (03): : EL227 - EL233
  • [39] Combined Effects of Noise and Reverberation on Speech Recognition Performance of Normal-Hearing Children and Adults
    Neuman, Arlene C.
    Wroblewski, Marcin
    Hajicek, Joshua
    Rubinstein, Adrienne
    EAR AND HEARING, 2010, 31 (03): : 336 - 344
  • [40] Speech recognition, loudness, and preference with extended bandwidth hearing aids for adult hearing aid users
    Van Eeckhoutte, Maaike
    Folkeard, Paula
    Glista, Danielle
    Scollie, Susan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2020, 59 (10) : 780 - 791