Free samples, profits, and welfare: The effect of market structures and behavioral modes

被引:6
|
作者
Jagpal, Sharan [1 ]
Spiegel, Menahem [2 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers Business Sch, Dept Mkt, Newark, NJ 07102 USA
[2] Rutgers Business Sch, Dept Finance & Econ, Newark, NJ 07102 USA
关键词
Behavioral modes; Samples; Social welfare; Spillover effects; Cournot-Nash equilibrium; Semi-cooperative game; Promotion; Public good;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.02.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper addresses an important and underresearched issue in the economics and marketing literatures: what are the managerial and social consequences when firms use business models that are based on the dissemination of free samples? We develop an analytical model of free samples for both digital and physical goods that addresses three fundamental managerial and social questions. First, what is the effect of different market structures (i.e., monopoly and oligopoly) and cost structures on optimal marketing policy and prices? Second, what is the effect of different behavioral modes on prices and free samples? Third, how do different market structures and behavioral modes affect social welfare? The main conclusion is that a number of standard results do not hold when firms have the option of selling products and of distributing free samples. For example, the optimal strategy for oligopolists who produce homogeneous goods and coordinate their marketing policies is to increase - not decrease - the quantity of sold output. Similarly, under well-defined cost and demand conditions, monopoly can lead to a socially inferior outcome to competition. From a policy viewpoint, the managerial and social welfare implications of free samples depend on the type of market structure (monopoly or oligopoly) and the behavioral modes chosen by the firms in an industry (e.g., whether to coordinate their free sample policies or to behave noncooperatively). (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:213 / 219
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Profits and perils in the antiques and collectibles market: the influence of product knowledge structures on dealer exchange outcomes
    Roster, Catherine A.
    Rogers, Mary Margaret
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF RETAIL DISTRIBUTION AND CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2016, 26 (01): : 1 - 16
  • [32] Network effect in complex market structures
    Uchida, Makoto
    Shirayama, Susumu
    PROCEEDING OF THE 2007 IEEE/WIC/ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WEB INTELLIGENCE AND INTELLIGENT AGENT TECHNOLOGY, WORKSHOPS, 2007, : 449 - +
  • [33] Extended Abstract: The Effect of Trading Fees on Arbitrage Profits in Automated Market Makers
    Milionis, Jason
    Moallemi, Ciamac C.
    Roughgarden, Tim
    FINANCIAL CRYPTOGRAPHY AND DATA SECURITY. FC 2023 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOPS, FC 2023, 2024, 13953 : 262 - 265
  • [34] THE EFFECTS OF DYNAMIC FREE-MARKET PROCESSES ON PRODUCT-MARKET STRUCTURES
    DANIEL, C
    NEBRASKA JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, 1982, 21 (04): : 3 - 18
  • [35] The effect of permeability on guided modes in planar structures
    Postava, K
    Pistora, J
    Hlubina, P
    OPTIKA '98 - 5TH CONGRESS ON MODERN OPTICS, 1998, 3573 : 524 - 527
  • [36] Market Structures with Multi-product Firms: Welfare Analysis and Policy Implications
    Alessandro Sembenelli
    Davide Vannoni
    Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 2001, 1 (2) : 161 - 179
  • [37] Estimation of the Effects of New Brands on Incumbents’ Profits and Consumer Welfare: The U.S. Processed Cheese Market Case
    Donghun Kim
    Review of Industrial Organization, 2004, 25 : 275 - 293
  • [38] Welfare effect of competition in medical market under regulated price
    Liu, Jun
    He, Meng-Qiao
    Shanghai Jiaotong Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2010, 44 (12): : 1693 - 1696
  • [39] The effect of life insurance settlement on insurance market and consumer welfare
    Hong, Jimin
    COMMUNICATIONS FOR STATISTICAL APPLICATIONS AND METHODS, 2020, 27 (06) : 689 - 699
  • [40] Tacit collusion and its welfare effect in a network product market
    Toshimitsu, Tsuyoshi
    ECONOMICS BULLETIN, 2018, 38 (04): : 1787 - +