Scientific machine learning benchmarks

被引:61
|
作者
Thiyagalingam, Jeyan [1 ]
Shankar, Mallikarjun [2 ]
Fox, Geoffrey [3 ]
Hey, Tony [1 ]
机构
[1] Sci & Technol Facil Council, Rutherford Appleton Lab, Harwell Campus, Didcot, Oxon, England
[2] Oak Ridge Natl Lab, Oak Ridge, TN USA
[3] Univ Virginia, Comp Sci & Biocomplex Inst, Charlottesville, VA USA
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
40;
D O I
10.1038/s42254-022-00441-7
中图分类号
O59 [应用物理学];
学科分类号
摘要
Finding the most appropriate machine learning algorithm for the analysis of any given scientific dataset is currently challenging, but new machine learning benchmarks for science are being developed to help. Deep learning has transformed the use of machine learning technologies for the analysis of large experimental datasets. In science, such datasets are typically generated by large-scale experimental facilities, and machine learning focuses on the identification of patterns, trends and anomalies to extract meaningful scientific insights from the data. In upcoming experimental facilities, such as the Extreme Photonics Application Centre (EPAC) in the UK or the international Square Kilometre Array (SKA), the rate of data generation and the scale of data volumes will increasingly require the use of more automated data analysis. However, at present, identifying the most appropriate machine learning algorithm for the analysis of any given scientific dataset is a challenge due to the potential applicability of many different machine learning frameworks, computer architectures and machine learning models. Historically, for modelling and simulation on high-performance computing systems, these issues have been addressed through benchmarking computer applications, algorithms and architectures. Extending such a benchmarking approach and identifying metrics for the application of machine learning methods to open, curated scientific datasets is a new challenge for both scientists and computer scientists. Here, we introduce the concept of machine learning benchmarks for science and review existing approaches. As an example, we describe the SciMLBench suite of scientific machine learning benchmarks.
引用
收藏
页码:413 / 420
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Evaluating Energy Efficiency of GPUs using Machine Learning Benchmarks
    Foster, Brett
    Taneja, Shubbhi
    Manzano, Joseph
    Barker, Kevin
    2023 IEEE INTERNATIONAL PARALLEL AND DISTRIBUTED PROCESSING SYMPOSIUM WORKSHOPS, IPDPSW, 2023, : 42 - 50
  • [12] Generative and reproducible benchmarks or comprehensive evaluation machine learning classifiers
    Orzechowski, Patryk
    Moore, Jason H.
    SCIENCE ADVANCES, 2022, 8 (47)
  • [13] Benchmarks for machine learning in depression discrimination using electroencephalography signals
    Seal, Ayan
    Bajpai, Rishabh
    Karnati, Mohan
    Agnihotri, Jagriti
    Yazidi, Anis
    Herrera-Viedma, Enrique
    Krejcar, Ondrej
    APPLIED INTELLIGENCE, 2023, 53 (10) : 12666 - 12683
  • [14] Machine Learning and the Future of Scientific Explanation
    Boge, Florian J.
    Poznic, Michael
    JOURNAL FOR GENERAL PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2021, 52 (01) : 171 - 176
  • [15] Research on Machine Learning for Scientific Discovery
    Meng X.-F.
    Hao X.-L.
    Ma C.-H.
    Yang C.
    Maoliniyazi A.-S.
    Wu C.
    Wei J.-Y.
    Jisuanji Xuebao/Chinese Journal of Computers, 2023, 46 (05): : 877 - 895
  • [16] The role of machine learning in scientific workflows
    Deelman, Ewa
    Mandal, Anirban
    Jiang, Ming
    Sakellariou, Rizos
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING APPLICATIONS, 2019, 33 (06): : 1128 - 1139
  • [17] SCIENTIFIC MACHINE LEARNING TAKES OFF
    Fairen-Jimenez, David
    ADVANCED MATERIALS & PROCESSES, 2020, 178 (06): : 7 - 7
  • [18] AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF MACHINE LEARNING AND DEEP LEARNING ALGORITHMS ON BEARING FAULT DIAGNOSIS BENCHMARKS
    Rezaeianjouybari, Behnoush
    Shang, Yi
    PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 2021 INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION (IMECE2021), VOL 7A, 2021,
  • [19] Machine Learning and the Future of Scientific Explanation
    Florian J. Boge
    Michael Poznic
    Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 2021, 52 : 171 - 176
  • [20] Adversarial Controls for Scientific Machine Learning
    Chuang, Kangway V.
    Keiser, Michael J.
    ACS CHEMICAL BIOLOGY, 2018, 13 (10) : 2819 - 2821