Women's reproductive span: a systematic scoping review

被引:14
|
作者
Nabhan, A. F. [1 ]
Mburu, G. [2 ]
Elshafeey, F. [3 ]
Magdi, R. [3 ]
Kamel, M. [3 ]
Elshebiny, M. [3 ]
Abuelnaga, Y. G. [3 ]
Ghonim, M. [3 ]
Abdelhamid, M. H. [3 ]
Ghonim, Mo [3 ]
Eid, P. [3 ]
Morsy, A. [3 ]
Nasser, M. [3 ]
Abdelwahab, N. [3 ]
Elhayatmy, F. [3 ]
Hussein, A. A. [3 ]
Elgabaly, N. [3 ]
Sawires, E. [3 ]
Tarkhan, Y. [3 ]
Doas, Y. [3 ]
Farrag, N. [3 ]
Amir, A. [3 ]
Gobran, M. F. [3 ]
Maged, M. [3 ]
Abdulhady, M. [3 ]
Sherif, Y. [3 ]
Dyab, M. [3 ]
Kiarie, J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Ain Shams Univ, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, El Khalifa El Maamoun St, Cairo 11341, Egypt
[2] WHO, Dev & Res Training Human Reprod HRP Res, UNDP UNFPA UNICEF WHO World Bank Special Programm, Geneva, Switzerland
[3] Egyptian Ctr Evidence Based Med, Cairo, Egypt
关键词
reproductive span; menarche; menopause; demography; assisted reproduction; infertility; humans; female; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION; NATURAL MENOPAUSE; LIFE-SPAN; INTERNATIONAL VARIABILITY; TEMPORAL TRENDS; HIGH-ALTITUDE; AGE; MENARCHE; GENE; POLYMORPHISMS;
D O I
10.1093/hropen/hoac005
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
STUDY QUESTION What is the scope of literature regarding women's reproductive span in terms of definitions, trends and determinants? SUMMARY ANSWER The scoping review found a wide variation in definitions, trends and determinants of biological, social and effective women's reproductive span. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY A woman's reproductive span refers to her childbearing years. Its span influences a woman's reproductive decisions. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION A systematic scoping review was conducted. We searched MEDLINE, PubMed, JSTOR, CINAHL, Web of Science and Scopus electronic databases from inception to January 2021 without imposing language or date restrictions. We searched unpublished sources including the Global Burden of Disease, Demographic and Health Surveys, and National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys. The list of relevant references was searched by hand. Sixty-seven reports on women's reproductive span were included in this review. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS This scoping systematic review followed an established framework. The reporting of this scoping review followed the reporting requirements provided in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, Extension for Scoping Reviews. Identified records were independently screened and data were extracted. We performed conceptual synthesis by grouping the studies by available concepts of reproductive span and then summarized definitions, measures used, temporal trends, determinants, and broad findings of implications on population demographics and assisted reproduction. Structured tabulation and graphical synthesis were used to show patterns in the data and convey detailed information efficiently, along with a narrative commentary. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE A total of 67 relevant reports on women's reproductive span were published between 1980 and 2020 from 74 countries. Most reports (42/67) were cross-sectional in design. Literature on reproductive span was conceptually grouped as biological (the interval between age at menarche and age at menopause), effective (when a woman is both fertile and engaging in sexual activity) and social (period of exposure to sexual activity). We summarized the working definitions, trends and determinants of each concept. Few articles addressed implications on demographics and assisted reproduction. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION A formal assessment of methodological quality of the included studies was not performed because the aim of this review was to provide an overview of the existing evidence base regardless of quality. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The review produced a comprehensive set of possible definitions of women's reproductive span, trends, and potential determinants. Further advancement of these findings will involve collaboration with relevant stakeholders to rate the importance of each definition in relation to demography and fertility care, outline a set of core definitions, identify implications for policy, practice or research and define future research opportunities to explore linkages between reproductive spans, their determinants, and the need for assisted reproduction. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This work received funding from the UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), a cosponsored programme executed by the World Health Organization (WHO). The authors had no competing interests. STUDY REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Reproductive factors in relation to heart failure in women: A systematic review
    Bolijn, Renee
    Onland-Moret, N. Charlotte
    Asselbergs, Folkert W.
    van der Schouw, Yvonne T.
    MATURITAS, 2017, 106 : 57 - 72
  • [42] Non-physician's challenges in sexual and reproductive health care provision for women of reproductive age with cancer: a scoping review of barriers and facilitators
    Chen, Qi
    Carpenter, Emma
    White, Kari
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2022, 30 (12) : 10441 - 10452
  • [43] The Late Reproductive Stage: A Scoping Review
    Woods, Nancy F.
    Coslov, Nina
    Richardson, Marcie
    Mitchell, Ellen S.
    MENOPAUSE-THE JOURNAL OF THE NORTH AMERICAN MENOPAUSE SOCIETY, 2020, 27 (12): : 1475 - 1475
  • [45] Access to and utilisation of sexual and reproductive healthcare for women and girls with cerebral palsy: a scoping review
    Shah, Sonali
    Taylor, Julie
    Bradbury-Jones, Caroline
    DISABILITY & SOCIETY, 2024, 39 (01) : 105 - 125
  • [46] Challenges for Women with Disabilities Accessing Reproductive Health Care Around the World: A Scoping Review
    An Nguyen
    Sexuality and Disability, 2020, 38 : 371 - 388
  • [47] Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach
    Munn, Zachary
    Peters, Micah D. J.
    Stern, Cindy
    Tufanaru, Catalin
    McArthur, Alexa
    Aromataris, Edoardo
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2018, 18
  • [48] Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach
    Zachary Munn
    Micah D. J. Peters
    Cindy Stern
    Catalin Tufanaru
    Alexa McArthur
    Edoardo Aromataris
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18
  • [49] Barriers and facilitators to women's access to sexual and reproductive health services in rural Australia: a systematic review
    Wood, Sarah M.
    Alston, Laura
    Chapman, Anna
    Lenehan, Jacinta
    Versace, Vincent L.
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [50] A Scoping Review on the Developmental Activities of Girls' and Women's Sports
    Peters, Carrie M.
    Hendry, David T.
    Hodges, Nicola J.
    JOURNAL OF SPORT & EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 44 : S48 - S49