Confidence Intervals for Survival Probabilities: A Comparison Study

被引:6
|
作者
Yuan, Xiaobin [1 ]
Rai, Shesh N. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Louisville, Biostat Shared Facil, James Graham Brown Canc Ctr, Louisville, KY 40202 USA
[2] Univ Louisville, Dept Bioinformat & Biostat, Louisville, KY 40202 USA
关键词
Binomial proportion; Effective sample size; Kaplan-Meier estimate; Survival probability; LIFE-TABLE ANALYSIS; BINOMIAL PROPORTION; APPROXIMATE;
D O I
10.1080/03610918.2011.560732
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
The confidence interval of the Kaplan-Meier estimate of the survival probability at a fixed time point is often constructed by the Greenwood formula. This normal approximation-based method can be looked as a Wald type confidence interval for a binomial proportion, the survival probability, using the oeffectiveo sample size defined by Cutler and Ederer. Wald-type binomial confidence interval has been shown to perform poorly comparing to other methods. We choose three methods of binomial confidence intervals for the construction of confidence interval for survival probability: Wilson's method, Agresti-Coull's method, and higher-order asymptotic likelihood method. The methods of oeffectiveo sample size proposed by Peto et al. and Dorey and Korn are also considered. The Greenwood formula is far from satisfactory, while confidence intervals based on the three methods of binomial proportion using Cutler and Ederer's oeffectiveo sample size have much better performance.
引用
收藏
页码:978 / 991
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条