Discharge after hip fracture surgery in relation to mobilisation timing by patient characteristics: linked secondary analysis of the UK National Hip Fracture Database

被引:11
|
作者
Sheehan, Katie J. [1 ]
Goubar, Aicha [1 ]
Martin, Finbarr C. [1 ,2 ]
Potter, Chris [2 ]
Jones, Gareth D. [2 ]
Sackley, Catherine [1 ]
Ayis, Salma [1 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Sch Populat Hlth & Environm Sci, Dept Populat Hlth Sci, Fac Life Sci & Med, 2nd Floor,Addison House,Guys Campus, London SE1 1UL, England
[2] Guys & St Thomass Natl Hlth Serv Fdn Trust, London, England
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Fracture neck of femur; Ambulation; Acute care; Key performance indicators; Quality improvement; Audit; Competing risk; Rehabilitation; COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT; GERIATRIC-PATIENTS; MORTALITY; REHABILITATION; COMPLICATIONS; OUTCOMES; INTERVENTIONS; COMORBIDITY; PREDICTORS; AMBULATION;
D O I
10.1186/s12877-021-02624-w
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Background Early mobilisation leads to a two-fold increase in the adjusted odds of discharge by 30-days compared to late mobilisation. Whether this association varies by patient characteristics identified as reasons for delayed mobilisation is unknown. Methods Audit data was linked to hospitalisation records for 133,319 patients 60 years or older surgically treated for hip fracture in England or Wales between 2014 and 2016. Adjusted proportional odds regression models tested whether the cumulative incidences of discharge differed between those mobilised early and those mobilised late for subgroups defined by dementia, delirium, hypotension, prefracture ambulation, and prefracture residence, accounting for the competing risk of death. Results Overall, 34,253 patients presented with dementia, 9818 with delirium, and 10,123 with hypotension. Prefracture, 100,983 were ambulant outdoors, 30,834 were ambulant indoors only, 107,144 were admitted from home, and 23,588 from residential care. 1502 had incomplete data for ambulation and 2587 for prefracture residence. 10, 8, 8, 12, and 12% fewer patients with dementia, delirium, hypotension, ambulant indoors only prefracture, or admitted from residential care mobilised early when compared to those who presented without dementia, delirium, hypotension, with outdoor ambulation prefracture, or admitted from home. The adjusted odds ratios of discharge by 30-days postoperatively among those who mobilised early compared with those who mobilised late were 1.71 (95% CI 1.62-1.81) for those with dementia, 2.06 (95% CI 1.98-2.15) without dementia, 1.56 (95% CI 1.41-1.73) with delirium, 2.00 (95% CI 1.93-2.07) without delirium, 1.83 (95% CI, 1.66-2.02) with hypotension, 1.95 (95% CI, 1.89-2.02) without hypotension, 2.00 (95% CI 1.92-2.08) with outdoor ambulation prefracture, 1.80 (95% CI 1.70-1.91) with indoor ambulation only prefracture, 2.30 (95% CI 2.19-2.41) admitted from home, and 1.64 (95% CI 1.51-1.77) admitted from residential care, accounting for the competing risk of death. Conclusion Irrespective of dementia, delirium, hypotension, prefracture ambulation or residence, early compared to late mobilisation increased the likelihood of hospital discharge by 30-days postoperatively. However, fewer patients with dementia, delirium, or hypotension, poorer prefracture ambulation, or from residential care mobilised early. There is a need reduce this care gap by ensuring sufficient resource to enable all patients to benefit from early mobilisation.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] EARLY RETURN TO OWN HOME AFTER HIP FRACTURE IS NOT UNSAFE - EVIDENCE FROM THE NATIONAL HIP FRACTURE DATABASE
    Johansen, A.
    Wakeman, R.
    Boulton, C.
    AGE AND AGEING, 2016, 45
  • [22] Risk Factors and 120-Day Functional Outcomes of Delirium After Hip Fracture Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study Using the UK National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD)
    Hawley, Samuel
    Inman, Dominic
    Gregson, Celia L.
    Whitehouse, Michael
    Johansen, Antony
    Judge, Andrew
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION, 2023, 24 (05) : 694 - 701.e7
  • [23] Early mobilisation after hip fracture surgery is associated with improved patient outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Agarwal, Nikhil
    Feng, Tony
    Maclullich, Alasdair
    Duckworth, Andrew
    Clement, Nicholas
    MUSCULOSKELETAL CARE, 2024, 22 (01)
  • [24] Understanding mortality rates after hip fracture repair using ASA physical status in the National Hip Fracture Database
    Johansen, A.
    Tsang, C.
    Boulton, C.
    Wakeman, R.
    Moppett, I.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2017, 72 (08) : 961 - 966
  • [25] Patient's perception of their readiness for discharge following hip fracture surgery
    Brent, Louise
    Coffey, Alice
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA NURSING, 2013, 17 (04) : 190 - 198
  • [26] Time to surgery after hip fracture across Canada by timing of admission
    Sheehan, K. J.
    Filliter, C.
    Sobolev, B.
    Levy, A. R.
    Guy, P.
    Kuramoto, L.
    Kim, J. D.
    Dunbar, M.
    Morin, S. N.
    Sutherland, J. M.
    Jaglal, S.
    Harvey, E.
    Beaupre, L.
    Chudyk, A.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 29 (03) : 653 - 663
  • [27] Time to surgery after hip fracture across Canada by timing of admission
    K. J. Sheehan
    C. Filliter
    B. Sobolev
    A. R. Levy
    P. Guy
    L. Kuramoto
    J. D. Kim
    M. Dunbar
    S. N. Morin
    J. M. Sutherland
    S. Jaglal
    E. Harvey
    L. Beaupre
    A. Chudyk
    Osteoporosis International, 2018, 29 : 653 - 663
  • [28] The 30-day survival and recovery after hip fracture by timing of mobilization and dementia A UK DATABASE STUDY
    Goubar, A.
    Martin, F. C.
    Potter, C.
    Jones, G. D.
    Sackley, C.
    Ayis, S.
    Sheehan, K. J.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2021, 103B (07): : 1317 - 1324
  • [29] COST-ANALYSIS OF EARLY DISCHARGE AFTER HIP FRACTURE
    HOLLINGWORTH, W
    TODD, C
    PARKER, M
    ROBERTS, JA
    WILLIAMS, R
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1993, 307 (6909): : 903 - 906
  • [30] Get up and get moving-early mobilisation after hip fracture surgery
    Sallehuddin, Hakimah
    Ong, Terence
    AGE AND AGEING, 2021, 50 (02) : 356 - 357