Robot-aided upper limb rehabilitation in the acute phase

被引:0
|
作者
Rosati, Giulio [1 ]
Masiero, Stefano [2 ]
Carraro, Elena [2 ]
Gallina, Paolo [3 ]
Ortolani, Marco [2 ]
Rossi, Aldo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Padua, DIMEG, I-35100 Padua, Italy
[2] Univ Padua, Dept Rehabil Med, I-35100 Padua, Italy
[3] Univ Trieste, Dept Energet, I-34127 Trieste, Italy
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to test whether additional sensorimotor robotic training of the paretic upper limb, started in acute post-stroke phase, enhanced motor recovery and functional outcome. NeReBot is a new cable-driven robotic device, developed at Padova University. Thirty patients with post-stroke hemiparesis received standard multidisciplinary rehabilitation and were randomly assigned either to robotic training within the first week after stroke, or exposed to the robotic device without training (control group). Outcomes were assessed by the same masked raters, with the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) of upper-extremity function, Medical Research Council score (MRC), Functional Independence Measurement (FIM) and Motor-FIM. The study revealed long term benefits of robotic therapy in persons with stroke-related paretic upper limb.
引用
收藏
页码:80 / 80
页数:1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A fuzzy-logic approach for longitudinal assessment of patients' psychophysiological state: an application to upper-limb orthopedic robot-aided rehabilitation
    Tamantini, Christian
    Cordella, Francesca
    di Luzio, Francesco Scotto
    Lauretti, Clemente
    Campagnola, Benedetta
    Santacaterina, Fabio
    Bravi, Marco
    Bressi, Federica
    Draicchio, Francesco
    Miccinilli, Sandra
    Zollo, Loredana
    JOURNAL OF NEUROENGINEERING AND REHABILITATION, 2024, 21 (01)
  • [42] Robotics in Health Care: Perspectives of Robot-Aided Interventions in Clinical Practice for Rehabilitation of Upper Limbs
    Ona, Edwin Daniel
    Garcia-Haro, Juan Miguel
    Jardon, Alberto
    Balaguer, Carlos
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2019, 9 (13):
  • [43] Upper-extremity robot-aided rehabilitation after stroke: A comparison of the arm and wrist robots
    Hsieh, Y. W.
    Shih, T. Y.
    Lin, K. C.
    Wu, C. Y.
    JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2017, 381 : 599 - 599
  • [44] Robot-aided Rehabilitation Task Design For Inner Shoulder Muscles
    Pei, Y.
    Kim, Y.
    Obinata, G.
    Genda, E.
    Stefanov, D.
    2012 ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY (EMBC), 2012, : 3922 - 3925
  • [45] Cooperative strategies for robot-aided gait neuro-rehabilitation
    Riener, R
    Lünenburger, L
    Colombo, G
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 26TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOLS 1-7, 2004, 26 : 4822 - 4824
  • [46] An inverse kinematics algorithm for upper-limb joint reconstruction during robot-aided motor therapy
    Papaleo, Eugenia
    Zollo, Loredana
    Sterzi, Silvia
    Guglielmelli, Eugenio
    2012 4TH IEEE RAS & EMBS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOMEDICAL ROBOTICS AND BIOMECHATRONICS (BIOROB), 2012, : 1983 - 1988
  • [47] A novel approach to stroke rehabilitation - Robot-aided sensorimotor stimulation
    Volpe, BT
    Krebs, HI
    Hogan, N
    Edelstein, L
    Diels, C
    Aisen, M
    NEUROLOGY, 2000, 54 (10) : 1938 - 1944
  • [48] Development of a Progressive Task Regulation Algorithm for Robot-aided Rehabilitation
    Colombo, R.
    Sterpi, I.
    Mazzone, A.
    Delconte, C.
    Pisano, F.
    2011 ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY (EMBC), 2011, : 3123 - 3126
  • [49] Adaptive Impedance Control for Robot-Aided Rehabilitation of Ankle Movements
    Perez Ibarra, Juan C.
    dos Santos, Wilian M.
    Krebs, Hermano I.
    Siqueira, Adriano A. G.
    2014 5TH IEEE RAS & EMBS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOMEDICAL ROBOTICS AND BIOMECHATRONICS (BIOROB), 2014, : 664 - 669
  • [50] Is robot-aided sensorimotor training in stroke rehabilitation a realistic option?
    Volpe, BT
    Krebs, HI
    Hogan, N
    CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROLOGY, 2001, 14 (06) : 745 - 752