Analysis of vulnerabilities in maritime supply chains

被引:74
|
作者
Liu, Honglu [1 ]
Tian, Zhihong [2 ,3 ]
Huang, Anqiang [1 ]
Yang, Zaili [3 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Tiaotong Univ, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Inst Graph Commun, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Liverpool John Moores Univ, Offshore & Marine Res Inst, Liverpool Logist, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Vulnerability; Maritime transport; Complex network; Network topology; Network robustness; Resilience; Maritime risk; COMPLEX NETWORK; CENTRALITY; RANKING;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2017.09.018
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This paper aims to analyze the different concepts of "vulnerability" used in maritime supply chains, and to develop a novel framework with supporting models to identify and analyze the relevant vulnerabilities in the chains. A real case of the Maersk shipping line in its Asia-Europe route is studied to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed framework. We find that the investigated network has stronger robustness against random failures than that when facing deliberate attacks. Furthermore, to identify vulnerable nodes (i.e. ports) of the network, two different types of analysis are undertaken through a multi-centrality model and a robustness analysis model, respectively. Consequently, the vulnerabilities estimated through robustness analysis can ascertain those by the classical centrality methods when they appear on both analysis results. More importantly, the similarity between the two outcomes can help gain more confidence on the accuracy in terms of the identification of the vulnerabilities in the system, while the difference (if any) such as those identified by the robustness analysis but not by the centrality analysis (or vice versa) can trigger a further investigation to find the comprehensive vulnerable nodes against different threats/hazards. It will aid rational decision on design and operation of resilient and robust maritime supply chains. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:475 / 484
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] On the information modeling for the electronic operation of supply chains: A maritime case study
    Makris, S.
    Xanthakis, V.
    Mourtzis, D.
    Chryssolouris, G.
    ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER-INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING, 2008, 24 (01) : 140 - 149
  • [32] Knowledge management methodology for identifying threats in maritime/logistics supply chains
    Kalogeraki, Eleni-Maria
    Apostolou, Dimitrios
    Polemi, Nineta
    Papastergiou, Spyridon
    KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT RESEARCH & PRACTICE, 2018, 16 (04) : 508 - 524
  • [33] Special Issue on "Infrastructure, Pricing and Regulatory Issues in Maritime Supply Chains"
    Vanelslander, Thierry
    Van de Voorde, Eddy
    MARITIME POLICY & MANAGEMENT, 2018, 45 (06) : 717 - 719
  • [34] Modeling the dynamic impacts of maritime network blockage on global supply chains
    Qu, Shen
    She, Yunlei
    Zhou, Qi
    Verschuur, Jasper
    Zhao, Lu-Tao
    Liu, Huan
    Xu, Ming
    Wei, Yi-Ming
    INNOVATION, 2024, 5 (04):
  • [36] Modelling and analysis of supply chains
    Bause, F
    Kaczmarek, M
    WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, 2001, 43 (06): : 569 - +
  • [37] Determinant factors for the development of maritime supply chains: The case of the Swedish forest industry
    Christodoulou, Anastasia
    Kappelin, Henrik
    CASE STUDIES ON TRANSPORT POLICY, 2020, 8 (03) : 711 - 720
  • [38] Optimising end-to-end maritime supply chains: a carbon footprint perspective
    Rigot-Muller, Patrick
    Lalwani, Chandra
    Mangan, John
    Gregory, Orla
    Gibbs, David
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT, 2013, 24 (03) : 407 - 425
  • [39] The Covid 19 Pandemic - Challenges for Maritime Transport and Global Logistics Supply Chains
    Grzelakowski, A. S.
    TRANSNAV-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON MARINE NAVIGATION AND SAFETY OF SEA TRANSPORTATION, 2022, 16 (01) : 71 - 77
  • [40] Risk management abilities in multimodal maritime supply chains: Visibility and control perspectives
    Vilko, Jyri
    Ritala, Paavo
    Hallikas, Jukka
    ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2019, 123 : 469 - 481