Sensitivity to energy technology costs: A multi-model comparison analysis

被引:74
|
作者
Bosetti, Valentina [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Marangoni, Giacomo [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Borgonovo, Emanuele [1 ]
Anadon, Laura Diaz [5 ]
Barron, Robert [6 ]
McJeon, Haewon C. [7 ]
Politis, Savvas [8 ]
Friley, Paul [8 ]
机构
[1] Bocconi Univ, Milan, Italy
[2] Fdn Eni Enrico Mattei, Milan, Italy
[3] CMCC, Bologna, Italy
[4] Politecn Milan, Milan, Italy
[5] Harvard Univ, Harvard Kennedy Sch, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[6] Univ Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
[7] JGCRI, Pacific NW Natl Lab, College Pk, MD USA
[8] Brookhaven Natl Lab, Upton, NY 11973 USA
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Sensitivity analysis; Integrated Assessment Models; Expert elicitation; Technology cost; RD-AND-D; UNCERTAINTY IMPORTANCE; EXPERT ELICITATION; PERFORMANCE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2014.12.012
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In the present paper we use the output of multiple expert elicitation surveys on the future cost of key low-carbon technologies and use it as input of three Integrated Assessment models, GCAM, MARKAL_US and WITCH. By means of a large set of simulations we aim to assess the implications of these subjective distributions of technological costs over key model outputs. We are able to detect what sources of technology uncertainty are more influential, how this differs across models, and whether and how results are affected by the time horizon, the metric considered or the stringency of the climate policy. In unconstrained emission scenarios, within the range of future technology performances considered in the present analysis, the cost of nuclear energy is shown to dominate all others in affecting future emissions. Climate-constrained scenarios, stress the relevance, in addition to that of nuclear energy, of biofuels, as they represent the main source of decarbonization of the transportation sector and bioenergy, since the latter can be coupled with Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) to produce negative emissions. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:244 / 263
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] SPECIAL ISSUE THE COSTS OF THE KYOTO PROTOCOL: A MULTI-MODEL EVALUATION Preface
    Watkins, G. Campbell
    ENERGY JOURNAL, 1999, : VI - VI
  • [22] Common EOFs: a tool for multi-model comparison and evaluation
    Abdel Hannachi
    Kathrin Finke
    Nickolay Trendafilov
    Climate Dynamics, 2023, 60 : 1689 - 1703
  • [23] Energy-Based Geometric Multi-model Fitting
    Isack, Hossam
    Boykov, Yuri
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER VISION, 2012, 97 (02) : 123 - 147
  • [24] Energy-Based Geometric Multi-model Fitting
    Hossam Isack
    Yuri Boykov
    International Journal of Computer Vision, 2012, 97 : 123 - 147
  • [25] Multi-model seasonal forecasts for the wind energy sector
    Lee, Doo Young
    Doblas-Reyes, Francisco J.
    Torralba, Veronica
    Gonzalez-Reviriego, Nube
    CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2019, 53 (5-6) : 2715 - 2729
  • [26] Multi-model seasonal forecasts for the wind energy sector
    Doo Young Lee
    Francisco J. Doblas-Reyes
    Verónica Torralba
    Nube Gonzalez-Reviriego
    Climate Dynamics, 2019, 53 : 2715 - 2729
  • [27] Sensitivity of Asian climate change to radiative forcing during the last millennium in a multi-model analysis
    Shi, Zhengguo
    Xu, Tingting
    Wang, Hongli
    GLOBAL AND PLANETARY CHANGE, 2016, 139 : 195 - 210
  • [28] A Bayesian multi-model inference methodology for imprecise momentindependent global sensitivity analysis of rock structures
    Kumar, Akshay
    Tiwari, Gaurav
    JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, 2024, 16 (03) : 840 - 859
  • [29] Multi-Model Hybrid System and the Stability Analysis
    Li Shunxiang
    Liu Jia
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 27TH CHINESE CONTROL CONFERENCE, VOL 2, 2008, : 556 - +
  • [30] A multi-model approach to analysis of environmental phenomena
    Giustolisi, O.
    Doglioni, A.
    Savic, D. A.
    Webb, B. W.
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2007, 22 (05) : 674 - 682