SiC MOSFET versus Si Super Junction MOSFET - Switching Loss Comparison in Different Switching Cell Configurations

被引:0
|
作者
Gui, Handong [1 ]
Zhang, Zheyu [1 ]
Ren, Ren [1 ]
Chen, Ruirui [1 ]
Niu, Jiahao [1 ]
Tolbert, Leon M. [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Fred [1 ,2 ]
Blalock, Benjamin J. [1 ]
Costinett, Daniel J. [1 ,2 ]
Choi, Benjamin B. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Min H Kao Dept Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
[2] Oak Ridge Natl Lab, Oak Ridge, TN USA
[3] NASA Glenn Res Ctr, Cleveland, OH USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
POWER; PERFORMANCE; DEVICES; IGBT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Although SiC MOSFETs show superior switching performance compared to Si IGBTs, it is unknown whether SiC MOSFETs have the same advantage over Si super junction (SJ) MOSFETs such as CoolMOS. This paper analyzes the switching performance in different switching cell configurations and summarizes the impact factors that influence switching loss. A double pulse test is conducted for a SiC MOSFET and a CoolMOS with the same voltage and current rating. In the FET/ diode cell structure, a SiC Schottky diode is used as the upper device to eliminate the reverse recovery, and the testing results show that the SiC MOSFET has 2.4 times higher switching loss than the Si CoolMOS. This can be explained by the smaller transconductance and the higher Miller voltage of the SiC MOSFET. On the other hand, the Si CooMOS has 10 times higher switching loss than the SiC MOSFET in the FET/FET cell structure because of the significant turn-on loss caused by the poor reverse recovery of its body diode.
引用
收藏
页码:6146 / 6151
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Switching Performance of a SiC MOSFET Body Diode and SiC Schottky Diodes at Different Temperatures
    Ahmed, M. R.
    Todd, R.
    Forsyth, A. J.
    2017 IEEE ENERGY CONVERSION CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION (ECCE), 2017, : 5487 - 5494
  • [22] Switching Loss Analysis of SiC-MOSFET based on Stray Inductance Scaling
    Wada, Keiji
    Ando, Masato
    2018 INTERNATIONAL POWER ELECTRONICS CONFERENCE (IPEC-NIIGATA 2018 -ECCE ASIA), 2018, : 1919 - 1924
  • [23] A method proposed for calculating the switching loss of SiC MOSFET in half bridge circuit
    Zhang, Dongxin
    Wei, Zuoyu
    Yu, Kefan
    Zhuo, Fang
    Liu, Yizhao
    Li, Huipeng
    2020 IEEE 9TH INTERNATIONAL POWER ELECTRONICS AND MOTION CONTROL CONFERENCE (IPEMC2020-ECCE ASIA), 2020, : 3460 - 3464
  • [24] A novel model for MOSFET switching loss calculation
    Bai, YM
    Meng, Y
    Huang, AQ
    Lee, FC
    IPEMC 2004: THE 4TH INTERNATIONAL POWER ELECTRONICS AND MOTION CONTROL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-3, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2004, : 1669 - 1672
  • [25] Wavelet based MOSFET switching loss analysis
    Kumar, Rajneesh
    Gupta, Kartmesh K.
    Manjunath, H. V.
    2007 CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS IPEC, VOLS 1-3, 2007, : 672 - 676
  • [26] Si-IGBT / SiC-MOSFET Hybrid Inverter Control Method for Reduced Loss and Switching Ripple
    Choi, Jonghun
    Lim, Gyu Cheol
    Ha, Jung-Ik
    2020 THIRTY-FIFTH ANNUAL IEEE APPLIED POWER ELECTRONICS CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION (APEC 2020), 2020, : 1183 - 1188
  • [27] Research on Switching Losses Testing Method for SiC MOSFET
    Zheng D.
    Zhang S.
    Li L.
    Cao H.
    Fan T.
    Ning P.
    Zhang J.
    Wen X.
    Zhongguo Dianji Gongcheng Xuebao/Proceedings of the Chinese Society of Electrical Engineering, 2020, 40 (09): : 2975 - 2982
  • [28] Effectiveness Analysis of SiC MOSFET Switching Oscillation Damping
    Wu, Yuying
    He, Ning
    Yu, Lingqiang
    Xu, Dehong
    Igarashi, Seiki
    Fujihira, Tatsuhiko
    2020 IEEE 9TH INTERNATIONAL POWER ELECTRONICS AND MOTION CONTROL CONFERENCE (IPEMC2020-ECCE ASIA), 2020, : 20 - 27
  • [29] Bidirectional Switching Characteristics Analysis Based on SiC MOSFET
    Song, Weizhang
    Zhang, Weijie
    Ren, Biying
    Zhong, Yanru
    2018 CHINESE AUTOMATION CONGRESS (CAC), 2018, : 2949 - 2954
  • [30] Influence of Parasitic Inductances on Switching Performance of SiC MOSFET
    Li, Jinyuan
    Cui, Meiting
    Du, Yujie
    Ke, Junji
    Zhao, Zhibin
    2018 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON POWER AND RENEWABLE ENERGY (ICPRE), 2018, 64