Digital breast tomosynthesis: Application of 2D digital mammography CAD to detection of microcalcification clusters on planar projection image

被引:0
|
作者
Samala, Ravi K. [1 ]
Chan, Heang-Ping [1 ]
Lu, Yao [1 ]
Hadjiiski, Lubomir [1 ]
Wei, Jun [1 ]
Helvie, Mark [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
digital breast tomosynthesis; planar projection image; computer-aided detection; microcalcification clusters; digital mammography; nonparametric analysis; JAFROC; COMPUTER-AIDED DETECTION;
D O I
10.1117/12.2076291
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Computer-aided detection (CAD) has the potential to aid radiologists in detection of microcalcification clusters (MCs). CAD for digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) can be developed by using the reconstructed volume, the projection views or other derivatives as input. We have developed a novel method of generating a single planar projection (PPJ) image from a regularized DBT volume to emphasize the high contrast objects such as microcalcifications while removing the anatomical background and noise. In this work, we adapted a CAD system developed for digital mammography (CAD(DM)) to the PPJ image and compared its performance with our CAD system developed for DBT volumes (CAD(DBT)) in the same set of cases. For microcalcification detection in the PPJ image using the CAD(DM) system, the background removal preprocessing step designed for DM was not needed. The other methods and processing steps in the CAD(DM) system were kept without modification while the parameters were optimized with a training set. The linear discriminant analysis classifier using cluster based features was retrained to generate a discriminant score to be used as decision variable. For view-based FROC analysis, at 80% sensitivity, an FP rate of 1.95/volume and 1.54/image were achieved, respectively, for CAD(DBT) and CAD(DM) in an independent test set. At a threshold of 1.2 FPs per image or per (DBT) volume, the nonparametric analysis of the area under the FROC curve shows that the optimized CAD(DM) for PPJ is significantly better than CAD(DBT). However, the performance of CAD(DM) drops at higher sensitivity or FP rate, resulting in similar overall performance between the two CAD systems. The higher sensitivity of the CAD(DM) in the low FP rate region and vice versa for the CAD(DBT) indicate that a joint CAD system combining detection in the DBT volume and the PPJ image has the potential to increase the sensitivity and reduce the FP rate.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Visibility of microcalcification clusters and masses in breast tomosynthesis image volumes and digital mammography: A 4AFC human observer study
    Timberg, P.
    Bath, M.
    Andersson, I.
    Mattsson, S.
    Tingberg, A.
    Ruschin, M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (05) : 2431 - 2437
  • [22] Breast Cancer Detection: Digital Breast Tomosynthesis with Synthesized Mammography versus Digital Mammography
    Ha, Su Min
    Chang, Jung Min
    RADIOLOGY, 2023, 309 (03)
  • [23] Filtered back-projection for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis with 2D filtering
    Rose, Sean D.
    Sidky, Emil Y.
    Reiser, Ingrid S.
    Pan, Xiaochuan
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2019: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2019, 10948
  • [24] Interval and Consecutive Round Breast Cancer after Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Synthetic 2D Mammography versus Standard 2D Digital Mammography in BreastScreen Norway
    Hovda, Tone
    Holen, Asne S.
    Lang, Kristina
    Albertsen, Judy Lynn
    Bjorndal, Hilde
    Brandal, Siri H. B.
    Sahlberg, Kristine Kleivi
    Skaane, Per
    Suhrke, Pal
    Hofvind, Solveig
    RADIOLOGY, 2020, 294 (02) : 256 - 264
  • [25] Screening Mammography Performance Metrics of 2D Digital Mammography Versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Women With a Personal History of Breast Cancer
    Chikarmane, Sona A.
    Cochon, Laila R.
    Khorasani, Ramin
    Sahu, Sonia
    Giess, Catherine S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2021, 217 (03) : 587 - 594
  • [27] Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Synthetic 2D Mammography versus Digital Mammography: Evaluation in a Population-based Screening Program
    Hofvind, Solveig
    Hovda, Tone
    Holen, Asne S.
    Lee, Christoph I.
    Albertsen, Judy
    Bjorndal, Hilde
    Brandal, Siri H. B.
    Gullien, Randi
    Lomo, Jon
    Park, Daehoon
    Romundstad, Linda
    Suhrke, Pal
    Vigeland, Einar
    Skaane, Per
    RADIOLOGY, 2018, 287 (03) : 787 - 794
  • [28] Multichannel response analysis on 2D projection views for detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis
    Wei, Jun
    Chan, Heang-Ping
    Hadjiiski, Lubomir M.
    Helvie, Mark A.
    Lu, Yao
    Zhou, Chuan
    Samala, Ravi
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (04)
  • [29] The simulation of 3D mass models in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis
    Shaheen, Eman
    De Keyzer, Frederik
    Bosmans, Hilde
    Dance, David R.
    Young, Kenneth C.
    Van Ongeval, Chantal
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (08) : 383 - 399
  • [30] Simplified Computer-Aided Detection Scheme of Microcalcification Clusters in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images
    Jeong, Ji-Wook
    Chae, Seung-Hoon
    Chae, Eun Young
    Kim, Hak Hee
    Choi, Young Wook
    Lee, Sooyeul
    2016 38TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY (EMBC), 2016, : 1070 - 1073