Effect of Gamma-Ray Energy on Image Quality in Passive Gamma Emission Tomography of Spent Nuclear Fuel

被引:11
|
作者
Belanger-Champagne, Camille [1 ]
Peura, Pauli [1 ,2 ]
Eerola, Paula [1 ]
Honkamaa, Tapani [3 ]
White, Timothy [2 ]
Mayorov, Mikhail [2 ]
Dendooven, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Helsinki Inst Phys, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland
[2] IAEA, A-1400 Vienna, Austria
[3] Radiat & Nucl Safety Author STUK, Helsinki 00881, Finland
关键词
Gamma-ray tomography; safeguards; spent nuclear fuel (SNF); DATA SHEETS;
D O I
10.1109/TNS.2018.2881138
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Gamma-ray images of VVER-440 and SVEA-96 spent nuclear fuel assemblies were reconstructed using the filtered backprojection algorithm from measurements with a passive gamma emission tomography prototype instrument at Finnish nuclear power plants. Image quality evaluation criteria based on line profiles through the reconstructed image are used to evaluate image quality for spent fuel assemblies with different cooling times, and thus different mixtures of gamma-ray emitting isotopes. Image characteristics at the locations of water channels and central fuel pins are compared in two gamma-ray energy windows, 600-700 and >700keV, for cooling times up to 10 years for SVEA-96 fuel and 24.5 years for VVER-440 fuel. For SVEA-96 fuel, images in the >700-keV gamma-ray energy window present better water-to-fuel contrast for all investigated cooling times. For VVER-440, images in the >700-keV gamma-ray energy window have higher water-to-fuel contrast up to and including a cooling time of 18.5 years, whereas the water-to-fuel contrast of the images taken in the two gamma-ray energy windows is equivalent for a cooling time of 24.5 years. Images reconstructed from higher energy gamma rays such as those in the >700-keV energy window present better water-to-fuel contrast in fuel cooled for up to 20 years and thus have the most potential for missing fuel pin detection.
引用
收藏
页码:487 / 496
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Pulsar gamma-ray emission
    Sahakian G.S.
    Khachatryan H.F.
    Astrophysics, 1999, 42 (4) : 477 - 483
  • [42] COMPARISON OF NUCLEAR AND GAMMA-RAY ABSOLUTE ENERGY SCALES
    JONES, KW
    MCELLISTREM, MT
    DOUGLAS, RA
    RICHARDS, HT
    PHYSICAL REVIEW, 1953, 91 (02): : 482 - 482
  • [43] Effect of gamma-ray beaming on the fluxes of gamma-ray pulsars
    Jiang, ZJ
    Zhang, L
    CHINESE PHYSICS LETTERS, 2005, 22 (05) : 1289 - 1292
  • [44] Gamma-ray pulsars expected in the outer gap model of gamma-ray emission
    Zhang, L
    Wu, J
    Jiang, ZJ
    Mei, DC
    CHINESE PHYSICS LETTERS, 2003, 20 (03) : 433 - 435
  • [45] ACCURATE EVALUATION OF GAMMA-RAY SPECTRA FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF GAMMA-RAY EMISSION PROBABILITIES
    JEDLOVSZKY, R
    POLACSEK, A
    ANDAI, A
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED RADIATION AND ISOTOPES, 1983, 34 (08): : 1057 - 1065
  • [46] Precursor plerionic activity and high-energy gamma-ray emission in the supranova model of gamma-ray bursts
    Inoue, S
    Guetta, D
    Pacini, F
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 583 (01): : 379 - 390
  • [47] Fast reconstruction of Bayesian iterative approximation in passive gamma-ray tomography
    Shiba, Shigeki
    Sagara, Hiroshi
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 57 (05) : 546 - 552
  • [48] Gamma-ray bursts and very high energy gamma-ray astronomy
    Hurley, K
    SPACE SCIENCE REVIEWS, 1996, 75 (1-2) : 43 - 52
  • [49] Gamma-ray induced degradation of PCBs and pesticides using spent reactor fuel
    Mincher, B.J.
    Meikrantz, D.H.
    Murphy, R.J.
    Gresham, G.L.
    Connolly, M.J.
    Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 1991, 42 (11): : 1061 - 1066
  • [50] ANOMALOUS EMISSION EFFECT AND POSSIBILITY OF GAMMA-RAY LASERS
    HANNON, JP
    TRAMMELL, GT
    OPTICS COMMUNICATIONS, 1975, 15 (03) : 330 - 334