Postoperative analgesia following surgical correction for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A comparison of continuous epidural analgesia and patient-controlled analgesia

被引:47
|
作者
Sucato, DJ
Duey-Holtz, A
Elerson, E
Safavi, F
机构
[1] Univ Texas, SW Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Dallas, TX 75219 USA
[2] Texas Scottish Rite Hosp Crippled Children, Dallas, TX USA
[3] Univ Texas, SW Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Management, Dallas, TX USA
关键词
adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; epidural analgesia; patient-controlled analgesia;
D O I
10.1097/01.brs.0000150832.53604.64
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. A retrospective comparison of postoperative continuous epidural analgesia and patient-controlled analgesia following surgical treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Objectives. To compare the safety and efficacy of continuous epidural analgesia and patient-controlled analgesia following adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery. Summary of Background Data. The most commonly used pain management techniques are continuous epidural analgesia and patient-controlled analgesia. However, no large published reports compare them following adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery. Methods. A review was performed from 1990 to 2001 of patients undergoing primary surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Visual analog scale scores were recorded postoperatively at multiple time periods. Adverse effects related to each pain management technique were noted. Results. The average of all pain scores (1.3 vs. 1.9) (P<0.0001) and scores at 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 48 hours (p<0.001) was significantly better in the continuous epidural analgesia group when compared to the patient-controlled analgesia group. The range of pain scores (2.3 vs. 2.7) (P<0.05) and the average maximum score was less in the continuous epidural analgesia group (2.6 vs. 3.2) (P<0.05). The need to temporarily stop and then restart the pain management (12.3% vs. 7.0%) (P=0.04) and premature permanent discontinuation (13.1% vs. 0.0%) (P<0.001) was greater in the continuous epidural analgesia group than the patient-controlled analgesia group. No neurologic injuries occurred. Conclusions. Although both continuous epidural analgesia and patient-controlled analgesia provide effective pain control following surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, patients with continuous epidural analgesia had significantly better pain scores for all time periods, less fluctuations in pain, and lower maximum pain levels during the postoperative period.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 217
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of 2 concentrations of levobupivacaine in postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia
    Dernedde, M
    Stadler, M
    Bardiau, F
    Boogaerts, JG
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2005, 17 (07) : 531 - 536
  • [22] Postoperative analgesia by combined continuous infusion and patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) following hip replacement: ropivacaine versus bupivacaine
    Bertini, L
    Mancini, S
    Di Benedetto, P
    Ciaschi, A
    Martini, O
    Nava, S
    Tagariello, V
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2001, 45 (06) : 782 - 785
  • [23] Patient-controlled epidural analgesia versus continuous epidural analgesia after total knee arthroplasty
    Silvasti, M
    Pitkänen, M
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2001, 45 (04) : 471 - 476
  • [24] Patient-controlled epidural analgesia versus continuous epidural analgesia after total knee arthroplasty
    Silvasti, M
    Pitkänen, M
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1999, 82 : 194 - 195
  • [25] Patient-controlled epidural analgesia is the technique of choice for epidural analgesia in labour
    Gogarten, W
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2005, 14 (04) : 328 - 329
  • [26] POSTOPERATIVE PATIENT-CONTROLLED ANALGESIA
    CUNDY, JM
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1990, 65 (03) : 440 - 440
  • [27] Immediate postoperative thoracic epidural analgesia following heart surgery: a comparative analysis of patient-controlled continuous thoracic epidural analgesia (PCCTEA) versus intermittent thoracic epidural analgesia (ITEA)
    LA Campos
    LG Soares
    F Fagundes
    MA Fernandes
    RV Gomes
    PM Nogueira
    R Farina
    HTF Mendonça F°
    J Sabino
    HF Dohmann
    Critical Care, 5 (Suppl 3):
  • [28] Postoperative patient-controlled analgesia
    Alon, E
    Jaquenod, M
    Schaeppi, B
    11TH INTERNATIONAL PAIN CLINIC: WORLD SOCIETY OF PAIN CLINICIANS, 2004, : 31 - 34
  • [29] Patient-controlled epidural analgesia following combined spinal-epidural analgesia in labour: the effects of adding a continuous epidural infusion
    Missant, C
    Teunkens, A
    Vandermeersch, E
    Van de Velde, M
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2005, 33 (04) : 452 - 456
  • [30] Postoperative pain control after lumbar spine fusion - Patient-controlled analgesia versus continuous epidural analgesia
    Cohen, BE
    Hartman, MB
    Wade, JT
    Miller, JS
    Gilbert, R
    Chapman, TM
    SPINE, 1997, 22 (16) : 1892 - 1896