Identifying star clusters in a field: A comparison of different algorithms

被引:58
|
作者
Schmeja, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, Inst Theoret Astrophys, Zentrum Astron, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
open clusters and associations: general; methods: statistical; LARGE-SCALE STRUCTURE; MINIMUM SPANNING TREE; MOLECULAR CLOUD COMPLEX; YOUNG STELLAR CLUSTERS; SMALL-MAGELLANIC-CLOUD; MAIN-SEQUENCE STARS; SPATIAL-DISTRIBUTION; GALAXY CLUSTERS; STATISTICAL-ANALYSIS; INTERSTELLAR CLOUDS;
D O I
10.1002/asna.201011484
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Star clusters are often hard to find, as they may lie in a dense field of background objects or, because in the case of embedded clusters, they are surrounded by a more dispersed population of young stars. This paper discusses four algorithms that have been developed to identify clusters as stellar density enhancements in a field, namely stellar density maps from star counts, the nearest neighbour method and the Voronoi tessellation, and the separation of minimum spanning trees. These methods are tested and compared to each other by applying them to artificial clusters of different sizes and morphologies. While distinct centrally concentrated clusters are detected by all methods, clusters with low overdensity or highly hierarchical structure are only reliably detected by methods with inherent smoothing (star counts and nearest neighbour method). Furthermore, the algorithms differ strongly in computation time and additional parameters they provide. Therefore, the method to choose primarily depends on the size and character of the investigated area and the purpose of the study. (C) 2011 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
引用
收藏
页码:172 / 184
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Field Stars and Star Clusters in M31
    P. Jablonka
    Astrophysics and Space Science, 1999, 265 : 523 - 529
  • [22] Disruption time scales of star clusters in different galaxies
    Lamers, HJGLM
    Gieles, M
    Portegies Zwart, S
    ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2005, 429 (01): : 173 - 179
  • [23] The separation of the stars of different masses in the spherical star clusters
    Freundlich, E
    Heiskanen, T
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PHYSIK, 1923, 14 : 226 - 239
  • [24] Integrated parameters of star clusters: a comparison of theory and observations
    Pandey, A. K.
    Sandhu, T. S.
    Sagar, R.
    Battinelli, P.
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2010, 403 (03) : 1491 - 1506
  • [25] Identifying clusters of leprosy patients in India: A comparison of methods
    Taal, Anneke T.
    Garg, Akshat
    Lisam, Suchitra
    Agarwal, Ashok
    Barreto, Josafa G.
    van Brakel, Wim H.
    Richardus, Jan Hendrik
    Blok, David J.
    PLOS NEGLECTED TROPICAL DISEASES, 2022, 16 (12):
  • [26] Star identification algorithms:: Novel approach & comparison study
    Silani, E.
    Lovera, M.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AEROSPACE AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS, 2006, 42 (04) : 1275 - 1288
  • [27] On the dynamics of young open star clusters in the joint field of the galaxy and of a star formation region
    Danilov, VM
    DYNAMICAL EVOLUTION OF STAR CLUSTERS - CONFRONTATION OF THEORY AND OBSERVATIONS, 1996, (174): : 389 - 390
  • [28] Mass distributions of star clusters for different star formation histories in a galaxy cluster environment
    Schulz, C.
    Pflamm-Altenburg, J.
    Kroupa, P.
    ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2015, 582
  • [29] ALGORITHMS TO EXHIBIT DIFFERENT TYPES OF MODULES AS CLUSTERS.
    Dronamraju, Srirama Krishna
    Krishna, J.Gopala
    1984, : 1 - 6
  • [30] Analysis and comparison of algorithms in advanced Web clusters solutions
    Alagic, D.
    Arbanas, K.
    2016 39TH INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY, ELECTRONICS AND MICROELECTRONICS (MIPRO), 2016, : 208 - 213