What influences attitudes about artificial intelligence adoption: Evidence from US local officials

被引:0
|
作者
Horowitz, Michael C. [1 ]
Kahn, Lauren [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Perry World House, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Council Foreign Relat, Washington, DC USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2021年 / 16卷 / 10期
关键词
ACCEPTANCE; OPINION; SYSTEMS; NEWS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0257732
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Rapid advances in machine learning and related techniques have increased optimism about self-driving cars, autonomous surgery, and other uses of artificial intelligence (AI). But adoption of these technologies is not simply a matter of breakthroughs in the design and training of algorithms. Regulators around the world will have to make a litany of choices about law and policy surrounding AI. To advance knowledge of how they will make these choices, we draw on a unique survey pool-690 local officials in the United States-a representative sample of U.S. local officials. These officials will make many of the decisions about AI adoption, from government use to regulation, given the decentralized structure of the United States. The results show larger levels of support for autonomous vehicles than autonomous surgery. Moreover, those that used ridesharing apps prior to the COVID-19 pandemic are significantly more supportive of autonomous vehicles. We also find that self-reported familiarity with AI is correlated with increased approval of AI uses in a variety of areas, including facial recognition, natural disaster impact planning, and even military surveillance. Related, those who expressed greater opposition to AI adoption also appear more concerned about trade-offs between privacy and information and bias in algorithms. Finally, the explanatory logic used by respondents varies based on gender and prior experience with AI, which we demonstrate with quantitative text analysis.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The cardiologist in the age of artificial intelligence: what is left for us?
    Luscher, Thomas F.
    Wenzl, Florian A.
    CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH, 2024, 120 (14) : e57 - e59
  • [22] Artificial intelligence in medicine: What is it doing for us today?
    Becker, Aliza
    HEALTH POLICY AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 8 (02) : 198 - 205
  • [23] Transnational TV Series Adaptations: What Artificial Intelligence Can Tell Us About Gender Inequality In France And The US
    Digeon, Landry
    Amin, Anjal
    MEDIA LITERACY AND ACADEMIC RESEARCH, 2021, 4 (01): : 6 - 23
  • [24] Epidemic effects in the diffusion of emerging digital technologies: evidence from artificial intelligence adoption
    Dahlke, Johannes
    Beck, Mathias
    Kinne, Jan
    Lenz, David
    Dehghan, Robert
    Worter, Martin
    Ebersberger, Bernd
    RESEARCH POLICY, 2024, 53 (02)
  • [25] Artificial Intelligence in Cancer Clinical Research: V. What We Have Learned About Human Intelligence from Artificial Intelligence
    Lyman, Gary
    Kuderer, Nicole
    CANCER INVESTIGATION, 2025, 43 (02) : 115 - 118
  • [26] The impact of XBRL adoption on local bias: Evidence from mandated US filers
    Li, Bing
    Liu, Zhenbin
    Qiang, Wei
    Zhang, Bohui
    JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2020, 39 (06)
  • [27] Confronting the Disruption of the Infectious Diseases Workforce by Artificial Intelligence: What This Means for Us and What We Can Do About It
    Langford, Bradley J.
    Branch-Elliman, Westyn
    Nori, Priya
    Marra, Alexandre R.
    Bearman, Gonzalo
    OPEN FORUM INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2024, 11 (03):
  • [28] Teachers' attitudes about the use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in classrooms
    Cabellos, Beatriz
    de Aldama, Carlos
    Ignacio Pozo, Juan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 59 : 666 - 666
  • [29] What have we learned about artificial intelligence from studying the brain?
    Samuel J. Gershman
    Biological Cybernetics, 2024, 118 : 1 - 5
  • [30] What artificial intelligence thinks about swine veterinarians
    Snelson, Harry
    JOURNAL OF SWINE HEALTH AND PRODUCTION, 2023, 31 (02): : 68 - 69