Sparse Volterra and Polynomial Regression Models: Recoverability and Estimation

被引:62
|
作者
Kekatos, Vassilis [1 ,2 ]
Giannakis, Georgios B. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Digital Technol Ctr, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Compressive sampling; Lasso; polynomial kernels; restricted isometry properties; Volterra filters; SELECTION; LASSO; WIENER; GENOME;
D O I
10.1109/TSP.2011.2165952
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Volterra and polynomial regression models play a major role in nonlinear system identification and inference tasks. Exciting applications ranging from neuroscience to genome-wide association analysis build on these models with the additional requirement of parsimony. This requirement has high interpretative value, but unfortunately cannot be met by least-squares based or kernel regression methods. To this end, compressed sampling (CS) approaches, already successful in linear regression settings, can offer a viable alternative. The viability of CS for sparse Volterra and polynomial models is the core theme of this work. A common sparse regression task is initially posed for the two models. Building on (weighted) Lasso-based schemes, an adaptive RLS-type algorithm is developed for sparse polynomial regressions. The identifiability of polynomial models is critically challenged by dimensionality. However, following the CS principle, when these models are sparse, they could be recovered by far fewer measurements. To quantify the sufficient number of measurements for a given level of sparsity, restricted isometry properties (RIP) are investigated in commonly met polynomial regression settings, generalizing known results for their linear counterparts. The merits of the novel (weighted) adaptive CS algorithms to sparse polynomial modeling are verified through synthetic as well as real data tests for genotype-phenotype analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:5907 / 5920
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Local polynomial regression estimation with correlated errors
    Francisco-Fernández, M
    Vilar-Fernández, JM
    COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-THEORY AND METHODS, 2001, 30 (07) : 1271 - 1293
  • [32] Estimation of polynomial regression from active experiments
    Kachiashvili, K.I.
    Industrial Laboratory (USSR) (English translation of Zavodskaya Laboratoriya), 1991, 56 (10):
  • [33] ESTIMATION OF POLYNOMIAL REGRESSION FROM ACTIVE EXPERIMENTS
    KACHIASHVILI, KI
    INDUSTRIAL LABORATORY, 1990, 56 (10): : 1260 - 1264
  • [34] Estimation of reference evapotranspiration using multivariate fractional polynomial, Bayesian regression, and robust regression models in three arid environments
    Khoshravesh M.
    Sefidkouhi M.A.G.
    Valipour M.
    Applied Water Science, 2017, 7 (4) : 1911 - 1922
  • [35] Recursive estimation for sparse Gaussian process regression
    Schuerch, Manuel
    Azzimonti, Dario
    Benavoli, Alessio
    Zaffalon, Marco
    AUTOMATICA, 2020, 120
  • [36] Sparse estimation and inference for censored median regression
    Shows, Justin Hall
    Lu, Wenbin
    Zhang, Hao Helen
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 2010, 140 (07) : 1903 - 1917
  • [37] Sparse Bayesian regression for head pose estimation
    Ma, Yong
    Konishi, Yoshinori
    Kinoshita, Koichi
    Lao, Shihong
    Kawade, Masato
    18TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PATTERN RECOGNITION, VOL 3, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, : 507 - +
  • [38] Sparse Regression Algorithm for Activity Estimation in γ Spectrometry
    Sepulcre, Yann
    Trigano, Thomas
    Ritov, Ya'acov
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2013, 61 (17) : 4347 - 4359
  • [39] Correlated variables in regression: Clustering and sparse estimation
    Buehlmann, Peter
    Ruetimann, Philipp
    van de Geer, Sara
    Zhang, Cun-Hui
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 2013, 143 (11) : 1835 - 1858
  • [40] Polynomial spline estimation of partially linear single-index proportional hazards regression models
    Sun, Jie
    Kopciuk, Karen A.
    Lu, Xuewen
    COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2008, 53 (01) : 176 - 188