Comparative evaluation of cost effective extraction free molecular technique for detection of SARS-CoV-2 with reference to standard VTM based RT-qPCR method

被引:0
|
作者
Dhakad, Megh Singh [1 ]
Gogoi, Sanjib [1 ]
Kumari, Ansu [1 ]
Singh, Aashish Kumar [2 ]
Jais, Manoj B. [1 ]
Prakash, Anupam [2 ]
Pangtey, Ghanshyam [2 ]
Kaur, Ravinder [1 ]
机构
[1] Lady Hardinge Med Coll & Associated Hosp, Dept Microbiol, New Delhi, India
[2] Lady Hardinge Med Coll & Associated Hosp, Dept Med, New Delhi, India
关键词
COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Coronavirus; Molecular diagnostic; Real time polymerase chain reaction;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Background and Objectives: The entire globe is undergoing an unprecedented challenge of COVID-19. Considering the need of rapid and accurate diagnostic tests for SARS-CoV-2, this study was planned to evaluate the cost effective extraction free RT-PCR technique in comparison to the standard VTM based RT-qPCR method. Materials and Methods: Paired swabs from nasopharynx and oropharynx were collected for SARS-CoV-2 testing, from 211 adult patients (>= 18 years) in VTM and plain sterile tubes (dry swabs). These samples were processed and RT-qPCR was carried out as per standard protocols. Results: 54.5% of the patients were females and 45.5% were males with sex ratio 1:1.19 (M: F). 38.86% were symptomatic, of which fever (86.59%), cough (79.23%) and breathlessness (46.34%) were the most common symptoms. The positivity by VTM based method and index method was 31.27% and 13.27% respectively. Of the 27 inconclusive results from index method, 37.04% were positive, 48.15% were negative by VTM based method. However, in 40 inconclusive results by VTM based method, 90% were negative and rest remained inconclusive by index method. The sensitivity and specificity of the index method were 39.39% and 85.71% respectively. The overall agreement between VTM based method and index method was 49.59% with estimated Kappa value of 0.19. Conclusion: VTM based method showed higher sensitivity compared to the index method. The higher positivity by VTM based method, suggests that VTM based method could plausibly be a better detection method of SARS-CoV-2. Still, the index method might add value in a resource limited setups for detection of SARS-CoV-2.
引用
收藏
页码:748 / 756
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Development and evaluation of an RT-qPCR for the identification of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant
    Sibai, Mamdouh
    Wang, Hannah
    Yeung, Priscilla S-W
    Sahoo, Malaya K.
    Solis, Daniel
    Mfuh, Kenji O.
    Huang, ChunHong
    Yamamoto, Fumiko
    Pinsky, Benjamin A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY, 2022, 148
  • [32] Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in tissue: the comparative roles of RT-qPCR, in situ RNA hybridization, and immunohistochemistry
    McHenry, Austin
    Iyer, Krishna
    Wang, Jianhi
    Liu, Chen
    Harigopal, Malini
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 22 (05) : 559 - 574
  • [33] Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 RNA quantification by RT-LAMP compared to RT-qPCR
    Minami, Kenta
    Masutani, Ryota
    Suzuki, Youichi
    Kubota, Meri
    Osaka, Naofumi
    Nakanishi, Toyofumi
    Nakano, Takashi
    Ukimura, Akira
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2021, 27 (07) : 1068 - 1071
  • [34] Analytical and clinical evaluation of a heat shock SARS-CoV-2 detection method without RNA extraction for N and E genes RT-qPCR
    Bruno, Alfredo
    de Mora, Domenica
    Freire-Paspuel, Byron
    Rodriguez, Angel S.
    Belen Paredes-Espinosa, Maria
    Olmedo, Maritza
    Sanchez, Martha
    Romero, Jennifer
    Paez, Michelle
    Gonzalez, Manuel
    Orlando, Alberto
    Angel Garcia-Bereguiain, Miguel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 109 : 315 - 320
  • [35] In vitro evaluation of the effect of mutations in primer binding sites on detection of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-qPCR
    Zimmermann, Fee
    Urban, Maria
    Krueger, Christian
    Walter, Mathias
    Woelfel, Roman
    Zwirglmaier, Katrin
    JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 2022, 299
  • [36] Deepening of In Silico Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 Detection RT-qPCR Assays in the Context of New Variants
    Gand, Mathieu
    Vanneste, Kevin
    Thomas, Isabelle
    Van Gucht, Steven
    Capron, Arnaud
    Herman, Philippe
    Roosens, Nancy H. C.
    De Keersmaecker, Sigrid C. J.
    GENES, 2021, 12 (04)
  • [37] COVID-19 Diagnosis: A Comprehensive Review of the RT-qPCR Method for Detection of SARS-CoV-2
    Dutta, Debashis
    Naiyer, Sarah
    Mansuri, Sabanaz
    Soni, Neeraj
    Singh, Vandana
    Bhat, Khalid Hussain
    Singh, Nishant
    Arora, Gunjan
    Mansuri, M. Shahid
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 12 (06)
  • [38] Impact of the Nucleic Acid Extraction Method and the RT-qPCR Assay on SARS-CoV-2 Detection in Low-Viral Samples
    Komiazyk, Magdalena
    Walory, Jaroslaw
    Kozinska, Aleksandra
    Wasko, Izabela
    Baraniak, Anna
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2021, 11 (12)
  • [39] Digital Microfluidic Multiplex RT-qPCR for SARS-CoV-2 Detection and Variants Discrimination
    Ho, Kuan-Lun
    Ding, Jing
    Fan, Jia-Shao
    Tsui, Wai Ning Tiffany
    Bai, Jianfa
    Fan, Shih-Kang
    MICROMACHINES, 2023, 14 (08)
  • [40] Capsid integrity RT-qPCR for the selective detection of intact SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater
    Canh, Vu Duc
    Torii, Shotaro
    Yasui, Midori
    Kyuwa, Shigeru
    Katayama, Hiroyuki
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 791