Comparative evaluation of cost effective extraction free molecular technique for detection of SARS-CoV-2 with reference to standard VTM based RT-qPCR method

被引:0
|
作者
Dhakad, Megh Singh [1 ]
Gogoi, Sanjib [1 ]
Kumari, Ansu [1 ]
Singh, Aashish Kumar [2 ]
Jais, Manoj B. [1 ]
Prakash, Anupam [2 ]
Pangtey, Ghanshyam [2 ]
Kaur, Ravinder [1 ]
机构
[1] Lady Hardinge Med Coll & Associated Hosp, Dept Microbiol, New Delhi, India
[2] Lady Hardinge Med Coll & Associated Hosp, Dept Med, New Delhi, India
关键词
COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Coronavirus; Molecular diagnostic; Real time polymerase chain reaction;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Background and Objectives: The entire globe is undergoing an unprecedented challenge of COVID-19. Considering the need of rapid and accurate diagnostic tests for SARS-CoV-2, this study was planned to evaluate the cost effective extraction free RT-PCR technique in comparison to the standard VTM based RT-qPCR method. Materials and Methods: Paired swabs from nasopharynx and oropharynx were collected for SARS-CoV-2 testing, from 211 adult patients (>= 18 years) in VTM and plain sterile tubes (dry swabs). These samples were processed and RT-qPCR was carried out as per standard protocols. Results: 54.5% of the patients were females and 45.5% were males with sex ratio 1:1.19 (M: F). 38.86% were symptomatic, of which fever (86.59%), cough (79.23%) and breathlessness (46.34%) were the most common symptoms. The positivity by VTM based method and index method was 31.27% and 13.27% respectively. Of the 27 inconclusive results from index method, 37.04% were positive, 48.15% were negative by VTM based method. However, in 40 inconclusive results by VTM based method, 90% were negative and rest remained inconclusive by index method. The sensitivity and specificity of the index method were 39.39% and 85.71% respectively. The overall agreement between VTM based method and index method was 49.59% with estimated Kappa value of 0.19. Conclusion: VTM based method showed higher sensitivity compared to the index method. The higher positivity by VTM based method, suggests that VTM based method could plausibly be a better detection method of SARS-CoV-2. Still, the index method might add value in a resource limited setups for detection of SARS-CoV-2.
引用
收藏
页码:748 / 756
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of extraction-free RT-qPCR methods for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics
    Domnich, Alexander
    De Pace, Vanessa
    Pennati, Beatrice M.
    Caligiuri, Patrizia
    Varesano, Serena
    Bruzzone, Bianca
    Orsi, Andrea
    ARCHIVES OF VIROLOGY, 2021, 166 (10) : 2825 - 2828
  • [2] Evaluation of extraction-free RT-qPCR methods for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics
    Alexander Domnich
    Vanessa De Pace
    Beatrice M. Pennati
    Patrizia Caligiuri
    Serena Varesano
    Bianca Bruzzone
    Andrea Orsi
    Archives of Virology, 2021, 166 : 2825 - 2828
  • [3] Direct NP- A cost-effective extraction-free RT-qPCR based test for SARS-CoV-2
    Parikh, Rasesh Y.
    Nadig, Satish N.
    Mehrotra, Shikhar
    Howe, Philip H.
    Gangaraju, Vamsi K.
    HELIYON, 2022, 8 (06)
  • [4] Fast, cheap and sensitive: Homogenizer-based RNA extraction free method for SARS-CoV-2 detection by RT-qPCR
    Ramirez-Cordova, Cristina
    Morales-Jadan, Diana
    Alarcon-Salem, Sofia
    Sarmiento-Alvarado, Alisson
    Proano, Maria Belen
    Camposano, Isabel
    Sarmiento-Alvarado, Berenice
    Bravo-Castro, Mishell
    Hidalgo-Jimenez, Jean Franco
    Coello, Dayana
    Rodriguez, Angel S.
    Viteri-Davila, Carolina
    Vallejo-Janeta, Alexander Paolo
    Arcos-Suarez, Daniela
    Garcia-Bereguiain, Miguel Angel
    FRONTIERS IN CELLULAR AND INFECTION MICROBIOLOGY, 2023, 13
  • [5] A simple RNA preparation method for SARS-CoV-2 detection by RT-qPCR
    Aniela Wozniak
    Ariel Cerda
    Catalina Ibarra-Henríquez
    Valentina Sebastian
    Grace Armijo
    Liliana Lamig
    Carolina Miranda
    Marcela Lagos
    Sandra Solari
    Ana María Guzmán
    Teresa Quiroga
    Susan Hitschfeld
    Eleodoro Riveras
    Marcela Ferrés
    Rodrigo A. Gutiérrez
    Patricia García
    Scientific Reports, 10
  • [6] Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA by multiplex RT-qPCR
    Kudo, Eriko
    Israelow, Benjamin
    Vogels, Chantal B. F.
    Lu, Peiwen
    Wyllie, Anne L.
    Tokuyama, Maria
    Venkataraman, Arvind
    Brackney, Doug E.
    Ott, Isabel M.
    Petrone, Mary E.
    Earnest, Rebecca
    Lapidus, Sarah
    Muenker, M. Catherine
    Moore, Adam J.
    Casanovas-Massana, Arnau
    Omer, Saad B.
    Dela Cruz, Charles S.
    Farhadian, Shelli F.
    Ko, Albert I.
    Grubaugh, Nathan D.
    Iwasaki, Akiko
    PLOS BIOLOGY, 2020, 18 (10)
  • [7] A simple RNA preparation method for SARS-CoV-2 detection by RT-qPCR
    Wozniak, Aniela
    Cerda, Ariel
    Ibarra-Henriquez, Catalina
    Sebastian, Valentina
    Armijo, Grace
    Lamig, Liliana
    Miranda, Carolina
    Lagos, Marcela
    Solari, Sandra
    Maria Guzman, Ana
    Quiroga, Teresa
    Hitschfeld, Susan
    Riveras, Eleodoro
    Ferres, Marcela
    Gutierrez, Rodrigo A.
    Garcia, Patricia
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [8] Rapid Detection SARS-CoV-2 Variants by Molecular Clamping Technology Based RT-qPCR
    Shen, S.
    Fu, A.
    Jamba, M.
    Li, J.
    Cui, Z.
    Pastor, L.
    Cataldi, D.
    Sun, Q.
    Pathakamuri, J.
    Kuebler, D.
    Rohall, M.
    Krohn, M.
    Kissinger, D.
    Neves, J.
    Archibeque, I.
    Powell, M.
    Zhang, A.
    Lu, C.
    Sha, M.
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 24 (10): : S56 - S57
  • [9] Influence of storage solution, temperature, assay time and concentration on RT-qPCR nucleic acid detection for SARS-CoV-2 detection of SARS-CoV-2 by the RT-qPCR
    Su, Lingxuan
    Lou, Yihan
    Li, Jiaxuan
    Mao, Haiyan
    Li, Jianhua
    Sun, Yi
    Zhou, Biaofeng
    Wu, Guangshang
    Huang, Chen
    Zhang, Yanjun
    Chen, Keda
    BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2024, 707
  • [10] Extraction-free rapid cycle RT-qPCR and extreme RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 virus detection
    Lownik, J. C.
    Farrar, J. S.
    Way, G.
    Martin, R. K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2021, 156 : S139 - S139