Surface settlement prediction for EPB shield tunneling in sandy ground

被引:44
|
作者
Fang, Yong [1 ]
He, Chuan [1 ]
Nazem, Ali [2 ]
Yao, Zhigang [1 ]
Grasmick, Jacob [2 ]
机构
[1] Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Transportat Tunnel Engn, Chengdu 610031, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Colorado Sch Mines, Civil & Environm Engn, Golden, CO 80401 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
shield tunneling; settlement; ground volume loss; longitudinal width coefficient; physical model test; MACHINE SCREW CONVEYORS; SOIL; CONSTRUCTION; DEFORMATION; MECHANICS; MOVEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s12205-017-0989-8
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Ground volume loss induced by shield tunnel construction is the major factor leading to ground settlement and deformation. The general equations predicting surface settlement based on ground volume loss involve a settlement trough width coefficient (parameter i) which in previous models was set as a constant in both the transverse and longitudinal directions. In this work, the equations predicting surface settlement during the construction were modified by introducing the parameter j - the width coefficient in the longitudinal direction, assumed to be different from that in the transverse direction. A model shield machine was adopted to carry a laboratory test under 1 g to investigate surface settlement induced by earth-pressure-balance shield tunnel construction in unsaturated sandy soil. The surface settlement during the excavating observed in the test was compared with that predicted by general equations from previous studies and the modified. The results showed that surface settlement above shield machine obtained by the modified equation proposed here fits the test data better than those obtained by the general equations because of the introduced longitudinal width coefficient.
引用
收藏
页码:2908 / 2918
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Prediction on ground surface settlement caused by subway shield construction in Xi'an
    Liu, Rongdi
    Zheng, Jianguo
    Zhang, Kai
    Li, Zhiyuan
    ADVANCES IN CIVIL AND INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, PTS 1-4, 2013, 353-356 : 1534 - +
  • [42] Ground settlement trough due to DOT shield tunneling
    Fang, Y. S.
    Huang, M. Y.
    Liu, C.
    Kao, C. C.
    GEOTECHNICAL ASPECTS OF UNDERGROUND CONSTRUCTION IN SOFT GROUND, 2014, : 147 - 151
  • [43] Ground Surface Displacements and Failure Mechanisms induced by EPB Shield Tunneling Method and Groundwater Levels Changes
    Vali, Ramin
    Boroujeni, Farah Foroughi
    TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE GEOTECHNOLOGY, 2023, 10 (04) : 616 - 638
  • [44] Ground Surface Displacements and Failure Mechanisms induced by EPB Shield Tunneling Method and Groundwater Levels Changes
    Ramin Vali
    Farah Foroughi Boroujeni
    Transportation Infrastructure Geotechnology, 2023, 10 : 616 - 638
  • [45] Time and settlement in EPB shield tunnelling
    Fang, Yung-Show
    Lin, Shyh-Jye
    Lin, Jaw-Shuenn
    Tunnels and Tunnelling, 1993, 25 (11):
  • [46] Online Fault Prediction for EPB Shield Tunneling Based on Neural Network
    Shi, Buhai
    Li, Weiqing
    ADVANCED MATERIALS AND ENGINEERING MATERIALS, PTS 1 AND 2, 2012, 457-458 : 1287 - 1293
  • [47] Finite element analysis for influence of shield tunneling on settlement of ground surface in loess strata
    Department of Civil Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China
    不详
    1600, 1343-1347 (November 2006):
  • [48] Analysis of ground settlement induced by Earth pressure balance shield tunneling in sandy soils with different water contents
    Hu, Xiongyu
    He, Chuan
    Peng, Zuzhao
    Yang, Wenbo
    SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2019, 45 : 296 - 306
  • [49] A case study on the behavior of shield tunneling in sandy cobble ground
    Zhang, Z. X.
    Zhang, H.
    Yan, J. Y.
    ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2013, 69 (06) : 1891 - 1900
  • [50] Predicting earth pressure balance (EPB) shield tunneling-induced ground settlement in compound strata using random forest
    Ling, Xianzhang
    Kong, Xiangxun
    Tang, Liang
    Zhao, Yize
    Tang, Wenchong
    Zhang, Yifan
    TRANSPORTATION GEOTECHNICS, 2022, 35