共 50 条
Can the laser-cut covered self-expandable metallic stent be the first choice for patients with unresectable distal malignant biliary obstruction? (with video)
被引:7
|作者:
Tanisaka, Yuki
[1
]
Mizuide, Masafumi
[1
]
Fujita, Akashi
[1
]
Ogawa, Tomoya
[1
]
Katsuda, Hiromune
[1
]
Saito, Youichi
[1
]
Miyaguchi, Kazuya
[1
]
Araki, Ryuichiro
[2
]
Ryozawa, Shomei
[1
]
机构:
[1] Saitama Med Univ, Dept Gastroenterol, Int Med Ctr, 1397-1 Yamane, Hidaka, Saitama 3501298, Japan
[2] Saitama Med Univ, Community Hlth Sci Ctr, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan
关键词:
braided;
endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography;
laser-cut;
malignant biliary obstruction;
self-expandable metal stent;
ENDOSCOPIC REMOVAL;
RANDOMIZED-TRIAL;
MULTICENTER;
STRICTURES;
MANAGEMENT;
MIGRATION;
D O I:
10.1002/jhbp.1034
中图分类号:
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Objectives To evaluate whether laser-cut covered self-expandable metallic stents (LC-CSEMSs) can be the first choice for patients with unresectable distal malignant biliary obstruction (DMBO). Methods Patients with unresectable DMBO who received LC-CSEMS (September 2014-December 2020) or braided CSEMS (B-CSEMS) (July 2013-December 2020) placement for biliary drainage were enrolled. Outcomes, including endoscopic CSEMS removal, of LC-CSEMSs and B-CSEMSs were compared. Results Overall, 124 patients received LC-CSEMSs placement, and 121 B-CSEMSs. Technical success, clinical success, and procedure-related adverse event rates with LC-CSEMSs were 100%, 96.8%, and 6.5%, respectively, and 100%, 95.9%, and 5.8%, respectively, for B-CSEMSs, with no significant difference (P > .99, .75, and >.99, respectively). The recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) rates with LC-CSEMSs and B-CSEMSs were 9.7% (12/124) and 13.2% (16/121), respectively (P = .43). The median time to RBO with LC-CSEMSs and B-CSEMSs was 198 (interquartile range [IQR], 124-244) days and 191 (IQR, 106-271) days (P = .41). The endoscopic removal success rates of LC-CSEMSs and B-CSEMSs were 88.9% (8/9) and 90% (9/10) (P > .99), although there were a small number of cases. Conclusions The non-inferiority of LC-CSEMSs was proven. LC-CSEMSs can be considered as the first choice for patients with unresectable DMBO.
引用
收藏
页码:585 / 593
页数:9
相关论文