Development and prospective validation of a risk score model in guiding individualized concurrent chemoradiotherapy in stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma in intensity-modulated radiotherapy era

被引:3
|
作者
Yang, Shan-Shan [1 ]
Pang, Ya-Jun [2 ]
Wang, Zhi-Qiang [3 ]
Zhang, Bao-Yu [1 ]
Liu, Zhi-Qiao [1 ]
Chen, En-Ni [1 ]
Ouyang, Pu-Yun [1 ]
Xie, Fang-Yun [1 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Canc Med, State Key Lab Oncol South China,Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol,Guangdong Key Lab Nasopharyngea, 651 Dongleng East Rd, Guangzhou 510060, Peoples R China
[2] Guangdong Med Univ, Canc Ctr, Affiliated Hosp, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Southern Med Univ, Dongguan Peoples Hosp, Dept Radiotherapy, Affiliated Dongguan Peoples Hosp, Dongguan, Guangdong, Peoples R China
来源
CANCER MEDICINE | 2022年 / 11卷 / 04期
关键词
concurrent chemoradiotherapy; intensity-modulated radiotherapy; nasopharyngeal carcinoma; tumor burden; RADIATION-THERAPY; CHEMOTHERAPY; SURVIVAL; OUTCOMES; VOLUME;
D O I
10.1002/cam4.4520
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose We aimed to develop and prospectively validate a risk score model to guide individualized concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for patients with stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) era. Materials and Methods In total, 1220 patients who received CCRT or IMRT alone were enrolled in this study, including a training cohort (n = 719), a validation cohort (n = 307), and a prospective test cohort (n = 194). Patients were stratified into different risk groups by a risk score model based on independent prognostic factors, which were developed in the training cohort. Survival rates were compared by the log-rank test. The validation and prospective test cohorts were used for validation. Results Total tumor volume, Epstein-Barr virus DNA, and lactate dehydrogenase were independent risk factors for failure-free survival (FFS, all p < 0.05). A risk score model based on these three risk factors was developed to classify patients into low-risk group (no risk factor, n = 337) and high-risk group (one or more factors, n = 382) in the training cohort. In the high-risk group, CCRT had better survival rates than IMRT alone (5-year FFS: 82.6% vs. 74.0%, p = 0.028). However, there was no survival difference between CCRT and IMRT alone either in the whole training cohort (p = 0.15) or in the low-risk group (p = 0.15). The results were verified in the validation and prospective test cohorts. Conclusion A risk score model was developed and prospectively validated to precisely select high-risk stage II NPC patients who can benefit from CCRT, and thus guided individualized treatment in IMRT era.
引用
收藏
页码:1109 / 1118
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Risk factors and prediction-score model for distant metastasis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy
    Li, An-Chuan
    Xiao, Wei-Wei
    Wang, Lin
    Shen, Guan-Zhu
    Xu, An-An
    Cao, Yan-Qing
    Huang, Shao-Min
    Lin, Cheng-Guang
    Han, Fei
    Deng, Xiao-Wu
    Zhao, Chong
    TUMOR BIOLOGY, 2015, 36 (11) : 8349 - 8357
  • [22] Outcomes of Adding Induction Chemotherapy to Concurrent Chemotherapy for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients with Moderate-Risk in the Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Era
    Su, Zhen
    Zou, Guo-rong
    Tang, Jie
    Li, Xiu Yue
    Xie, Fang-Yun
    THERAPEUTICS AND CLINICAL RISK MANAGEMENT, 2020, 16 : 201 - 211
  • [23] Individualized Concurrent Chemotherapy for Patients with Stage III-IVa Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Combined with Definitive Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy
    Ji, Pengjie
    Lu, Qiongjiao
    Chen, Xiaoqiang
    Chen, Yuebing
    Peng, Xiane
    Chen, Zhiwei
    Lin, Cheng
    Lin, Shaojun
    Zong, Jingfeng
    CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2023, 55 (04): : 1113 - 1122
  • [24] The Impact of Clinical Stage on Radiation Doses to Organs at Risk Following Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Prospective Analysis
    Xu, Lin
    Yao, Ji-Jin
    Zhou, Guan-Qun
    Zhang, Wang-Jian
    Liu, Guo-Long
    Liu, Li-Zhi
    Ma, Jun
    Sun, Ying
    JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2016, 7 (14): : 2157 - 2164
  • [25] Prognostic nomogram for pediatric nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy era.
    Zhang, Yizhuo
    Hong, Ye
    Chen, Huimou
    Wu, Yanpeng
    Zhu, Jia
    Huang, Junting
    Wang, Juan
    Sun, Feifei
    Que, Yi
    Zhang, Lian
    Chen, Binbin
    Lu, Suying
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 39 (15)
  • [26] Apolipoprotein A-I Is a Prognosticator of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in the Era of Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy
    Chang, Hui
    Wei, Jia-wang
    Chen, Kai
    Zhang, Shu
    Han, Fei
    Lu, Li-xia
    Xiao, Wei-wei
    Gao, Yuan-hong
    JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2018, 9 (04): : 702 - 710
  • [27] The efficacy of induction chemotherapy in stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) era
    Li, P-J.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2018, 29 : 98 - 98
  • [28] The efficacy of induction chemotherapy in the treatment of stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma in intensity modulated radiotherapy era
    Li, Pei-Jing
    Mo, Hao-Yuan
    Luo, Dong-Hua
    Hu, Wei-Han
    Jin, Ting
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 85 : 95 - 100
  • [29] Significance of chemotherapy for older patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy era: A propensity score matching analysis
    Chen, Jiawei
    Ding, Jianming
    Xu, Yiying
    Hong, Huiling
    Lin, Xiaoting
    Xu, Mengting
    Yan, Linghui
    Xu, Ting
    Fei, Zhaodong
    Chen, Chuanben
    JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC ONCOLOGY, 2023, 14 (08)
  • [30] The development and external validation of simplified T category classification for nasopharyngeal carcinoma to improve the prognostic value in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy era
    Tang, Ling-Long
    Liang, Shao-Bo
    Huang, Cheng-Long
    Zhang, Fan
    Xu, Cheng
    Mao, Yan-Ping
    Tian, Li
    Lin, Ai-Hua
    Li, Li
    Sun, Ying
    Ma, Jun
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2019, 8 (05): : 2213 - 2222