Development and prospective validation of a risk score model in guiding individualized concurrent chemoradiotherapy in stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma in intensity-modulated radiotherapy era

被引:3
|
作者
Yang, Shan-Shan [1 ]
Pang, Ya-Jun [2 ]
Wang, Zhi-Qiang [3 ]
Zhang, Bao-Yu [1 ]
Liu, Zhi-Qiao [1 ]
Chen, En-Ni [1 ]
Ouyang, Pu-Yun [1 ]
Xie, Fang-Yun [1 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Canc Med, State Key Lab Oncol South China,Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol,Guangdong Key Lab Nasopharyngea, 651 Dongleng East Rd, Guangzhou 510060, Peoples R China
[2] Guangdong Med Univ, Canc Ctr, Affiliated Hosp, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Southern Med Univ, Dongguan Peoples Hosp, Dept Radiotherapy, Affiliated Dongguan Peoples Hosp, Dongguan, Guangdong, Peoples R China
来源
CANCER MEDICINE | 2022年 / 11卷 / 04期
关键词
concurrent chemoradiotherapy; intensity-modulated radiotherapy; nasopharyngeal carcinoma; tumor burden; RADIATION-THERAPY; CHEMOTHERAPY; SURVIVAL; OUTCOMES; VOLUME;
D O I
10.1002/cam4.4520
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose We aimed to develop and prospectively validate a risk score model to guide individualized concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for patients with stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) era. Materials and Methods In total, 1220 patients who received CCRT or IMRT alone were enrolled in this study, including a training cohort (n = 719), a validation cohort (n = 307), and a prospective test cohort (n = 194). Patients were stratified into different risk groups by a risk score model based on independent prognostic factors, which were developed in the training cohort. Survival rates were compared by the log-rank test. The validation and prospective test cohorts were used for validation. Results Total tumor volume, Epstein-Barr virus DNA, and lactate dehydrogenase were independent risk factors for failure-free survival (FFS, all p < 0.05). A risk score model based on these three risk factors was developed to classify patients into low-risk group (no risk factor, n = 337) and high-risk group (one or more factors, n = 382) in the training cohort. In the high-risk group, CCRT had better survival rates than IMRT alone (5-year FFS: 82.6% vs. 74.0%, p = 0.028). However, there was no survival difference between CCRT and IMRT alone either in the whole training cohort (p = 0.15) or in the low-risk group (p = 0.15). The results were verified in the validation and prospective test cohorts. Conclusion A risk score model was developed and prospectively validated to precisely select high-risk stage II NPC patients who can benefit from CCRT, and thus guided individualized treatment in IMRT era.
引用
收藏
页码:1109 / 1118
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the era of intensity-modulated radiotherapy
    Yongyuan Xue
    Guoping Li
    Tao Xie
    Hongyang Xu
    Tianrui Xu
    Zhengfei Li
    Lixiu Zhu
    Xin Li
    Zhiyao Li
    Wei Xiong
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2023, 280 : 3097 - 3106
  • [2] Concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the era of intensity-modulated radiotherapy
    Xue, Yongyuan
    Li, Guoping
    Xie, Tao
    Xu, Hongyang
    Xu, Tianrui
    Li, Zhengfei
    Zhu, Lixiu
    Li, Xin
    Li, Zhiyao
    Xiong, Wei
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2023, 280 (07) : 3097 - 3106
  • [3] Management of Chemotherapy for Stage II Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in the Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Era: A Review
    Wu, Peng
    Zhao, Yumei
    Xiang, Li
    Yang, Linglin
    CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2020, 12 : 957 - 963
  • [4] Comparison of the efficacy between concurrent chemoradiotherapy with or without adjuvant chemotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy alone for stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Chen, Kai-Hua
    Zhu, Xiao-Dong
    Li, Ling
    Qu, Song
    Liang, Zhen-Qiang
    Liang, Xia
    Pan, Xin-Bin
    Liang, Zhong-Guo
    Jiang, Yan-Ming
    ONCOTARGET, 2016, 7 (42) : 69041 - 69050
  • [5] Concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in older patients with stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma after intensity-modulated radiotherapy: A propensity score-matched cohort study
    Wang, Fang
    Zhou, Lu
    Zhang, Li-Jun
    Xie, Chang-Bin
    Liao, Zhi-Wei
    Lin, Xiao-Dan
    Wen, Yue- Feng
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 191
  • [6] Role of sequential chemoradiotherapy in stage II and low-risk stage III-IV nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the era of intensity-modulated radiotherapy: A propensity score-matched analysis
    Xu, Cheng
    Sun, Rui
    Tang, Ling-Long
    Chen, Lei
    Li, Wen-Fei
    Mao, Yan-Ping
    Zhou, Guan-Qun
    Guo, Rui
    Lin, Ai-Hua
    Sun, Ying
    Ma, Jun
    Hu, Wei-Han
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 78 : 37 - 45
  • [7] Concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the era of intensity-modulated radiotherapy: a meta-analysis
    He, Yan
    Guo, Tao
    Guan, Hui
    Wang, Jingjing
    Sun, Yu
    Peng, Xingchen
    CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2018, 10 : 1419 - 1428
  • [8] Long-term outcomes for radiotherapy alone verse combined chemoradiotherapy for patients with stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the era of intensity-modulated radiotherapy
    Man Hu
    Fan Pingping
    Fan Bingjie
    Zhang Guoli
    Liu Xijun
    Yu Jinming
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (15)
  • [9] The role of concurrent chemotherapy for stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy era: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liu, Fang
    Jin, Tao
    Liu, Lei
    Xiang, Zhongzheng
    Yan, Ruonan
    Yang, Hui
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (03):
  • [10] Intensity-modulated radiotherapy alone compared with intensity-modulated radiotherapy plus concurrent chemotherapy in intermediate-risk nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Liao, Shufang
    Zhang, Bin
    Su, Yixin
    Pan, Yufei
    Zhang, Jian
    Ye, Zhenkai
    Zhang, Rongjun
    Kong, Xiangyun
    Qin, Guanjie
    Mo, Yunyan
    Ruan, Xiaolan
    Liu, Jian
    Gan, Chunqiao
    Dai, Jinxuan
    Zhang, Ruyun
    Luo, Guanhong
    Liao, Xiaofei
    Jiang, Wei
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2024, 200 (10) : 867 - 875