Estimation of Uncertainty for Contour Method Residual Stress Measurements

被引:57
|
作者
Olson, M. D. [1 ,2 ]
DeWald, A. T. [1 ]
Prime, M. B. [3 ]
Hill, M. R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Hill Engn LLC, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[3] Los Alamos Natl Lab, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA
关键词
Residual stress measurement; Contour method; Uncertainty quantification; Repeatability; Aluminum alloy 7050-T74; Quenching; ERROR;
D O I
10.1007/s11340-014-9971-2
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This paper describes a methodology for the estimation of measurement uncertainty for the contour method, where the contour method is an experimental technique for measuring a two-dimensional map of residual stress over a plane. Random error sources including the error arising from noise in displacement measurements and the smoothing of the displacement surfaces are accounted for in the uncertainty analysis. The output is a two-dimensional, spatially varying uncertainty estimate such that every point on the cross-section where residual stress is determined has a corresponding uncertainty value. Both numerical and physical experiments are reported, which are used to support the usefulness of the proposed uncertainty estimator. The uncertainty estimator shows the contour method to have larger uncertainty near the perimeter of the measurement plane. For the experiments, which were performed on a quenched aluminum bar with a cross section of 51 x 76 mm, the estimated uncertainty was approximately 5 MPa (sigma/E = 7 center dot 10(-5)) over the majority of the cross-section, with localized areas of higher uncertainty, up to 10 MPa (sigma/E = 14 center dot 10(-5)).
引用
收藏
页码:577 / 585
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Guidelines to select suitable parameters for contour method stress measurements
    Naveed, N.
    ARCHIVES OF MECHANICS, 2020, 72 (01): : 39 - 58
  • [32] Residual stress measurements in single and multi-pass groove weld specimens using neutron diffraction and the contour method
    Kartal, M.
    Turski, M.
    Johnson, G.
    Fitzpatrick, M. E.
    Gungor, S.
    Withers, P. J.
    Edwards, L.
    RESIDUAL STRESSES VII, 2006, 524-525 : 671 - 676
  • [33] METHODS FOR UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION AND COMPARISON OF WELD RESIDUAL STRESS MEASUREMENTS AND PREDICTIONS
    Lewis, John R.
    Brooks, Dusty
    Benson, Michael L.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME PRESSURE VESSELS AND PIPING CONFERENCE, 2017, VOL 6B, 2017,
  • [34] Surface residual stress measurements by layer removal method
    Zamashchikov, Yury I.
    Zamashchikov, Yury I. (zamachtchikov@mail.ru), 1600, Inderscience Publishers (16): : 3 - 4
  • [35] MEASUREMENT OF WELDING RESIDUAL STRESS IN DISSIMILAR METAL WELDS USING THE CONTOUR METHOD
    DeWald, Adrian T.
    Hill, Michael R.
    Willis, Eric
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME PRESSURE VESSELS AND PIPING CONFERENCE, PVP 2011, VOL 6, A AND B, 2012, : 1599 - 1605
  • [36] Correction to: Interlaboratory Reproducibility of Contour Method Data Analysis and Residual Stress Calculation
    C. R. D’Elia
    S. S. Carlson
    M. L. Stanfield
    M. B. Prime
    J. Araújo de Oliveira
    T. J. Spradlin
    J. B. Lévesque
    M. R. Hill
    Experimental Mechanics, 2020, 60 : 1033 - 1033
  • [37] RESIDUAL STRESS MEASUREMENT OF A HIPPED BONDED VALVE SEAT USING THE CONTOUR METHOD
    Hosseinzadeh, Foroogh
    Bouchard, P. John
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME PRESSURE VESSELS AND PIPING CONFERENCE - 2013, VOL 6B: MATERIALS AND FABRICATION, 2014,
  • [38] Investigating optimal cutting configurations for the contour method of weld residual stress measurement
    Muransky, O.
    Hosseinzadeh, F.
    Hamelin, C. J.
    Traore, Y.
    Bendeich, P. J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSELS AND PIPING, 2018, 164 : 55 - 67
  • [39] On the residual stress measurement for non-conductive species by modified contour method
    Fei Wang
    Journal of the Australian Ceramic Society, 2024, 60 : 187 - 193
  • [40] On the residual stress measurement for non-conductive species by modified contour method
    Wang, Fei
    JOURNAL OF THE AUSTRALIAN CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2024, 60 (01) : 187 - 193