Imprint cytology of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer - Experience with rapid, intraoperative diagnosis and primary screening by cytotechnologists

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the intraoperative imprint diagnoses of smears from sentinel lymph nodes that had been primary screened by cytotechnologists and to assess the most important causes of false negative (FN) imprint diagnoses. STUDY DESIGN: Material consisted of 429 imprints from sentinel lymph nodes in 211 breast cancer patients that were sent for frozen section examination over 13 months. RESULTS: The mean number of imprints/lymph nodes per patient was 2.02. The mean screening time per imprint was 3.6 minutes. Sixty-six sentinel nodes (16%) from 51 women (24%) were metastatic. Imprints and/or frozen sections were positive in 54 nodes (82%). Imprints were positive in 38 nodes, representing 70% of intraoperative positive nodes and 58% of the total number of positive nodes. Twenty-six of 28 (93%) FN imprints were due to suboptimal sampling. Four of 9 FN macrometastases did not contain diagnostic or suspicious cells/cell groups even on rescreening, whereas a few, and then only 1 diagnostic group were identified in 2/9. There were no false positives. CONCLUSION: Primary screening by experienced cytotechnologists is both rapid and reliable and enabled the diagnosing pathologist to concentrate on the frozen section. The major cause of false negative imprints is sampling, even in macrometastases.