Effects of stored feed cropping systems and farm size on the profitability of Maine organic dairy farm simulations

被引:7
|
作者
Hoshide, A. K. [1 ,2 ]
Halloran, J. M. [1 ]
Kersbergen, R. J. [3 ]
Griffin, T. S. [4 ]
DeFauw, S. L. [1 ]
LaGasse, B. J. [1 ]
Jain, S.
机构
[1] USDA, New England Plant Soil & Water Lab, Orono, ME 04469 USA
[2] Univ Maine, Sch Econ, Orono, ME 04469 USA
[3] Univ Maine Cooperat Extens, Waldo, ME 04915 USA
[4] Tufts Univ, Friedman Sch Nutr Sci & Policy, Boston, MA 02111 USA
关键词
dairy; economic; integrated farm system model; organic; HERD MODEL; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.3168/jds.2011-4361
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
United States organic dairy production has increased to meet the growing demand for organic milk. Despite higher prices received for milk, organic dairy farmers have come under increasing financial stress due to increases in concentrated feed prices over the past few years, which can make up one-third of variable costs. Market demand for milk has also leveled in the last year, resulting in some downward pressure on prices paid to dairy farmers. Organic dairy farmers in the Northeast United States have experimented with growing different forage and grain crops to maximize on-farm production of protein and energy to improve profitability. Three representative organic feed systems were simulated using the integrated farm system model for farms with 30, 120, and 220 milk cows. Increasing intensity of equipment use was represented by organic dairy farms growing only perennial sod (low) to those with corn-based forage systems, which purchase supplemental grain (medium) or which produce and feed soybeans (high). The relative profitability of these 3 organic feed systems was strongly dependent on dairy farm size. From results, we suggest smaller organic dairy farms can be more profitable with perennial sod-based rather than corn-based forage systems due to lower fixed costs from using only equipment associated with perennial forage harvest and storage. The largest farm size was more profitable using a corn-based system due to greater economies of scale for growing soybeans, corn grain, winter cereals, and corn silages. At an intermediate farm size of 120 cows, corn-based forage systems were more profitable if perennial sod was not harvested at optimum quality, corn was grown on better soils, or if milk yield was 10% higher. Delayed harvest decreased the protein and energy content of perennial sod crops, requiring more purchased grain to balance the ration and resulting in lower profits. Corn-based systems were less affected by lower perennial forage quality, as corn silage is part of the forage base. Growing on better soils increased corn yields more than perennial forage yields. Large corn-based organic dairy farms that produced and fed soybeans minimized off-farm grain purchases and were the most profitable among large farms. Although perennial sod-based systems purchased more grain, these organic systems were more profitable under timely forage harvest, decreased soil quality, and relatively lower purchased energy prices and higher protein supplement prices.
引用
收藏
页码:5710 / 5723
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Improving farm profitability also reduces the carbon footprint of milk production in intensive dairy production systems
    Jayasundara, Susantha
    Worden, David
    Weersink, Alfons
    Wright, Tom
    VanderZaag, Andrew
    Gordon, Robert
    Wagner-Riddle, Claudia
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 229 : 1018 - 1028
  • [22] Implications of feed concentrate reduction in organic grassland-based dairy systems: a long-term on-farm study
    Leiber, F.
    Schenk, I. K.
    Maeschli, A.
    Ivemeyer, S.
    Zeitz, J. O.
    Moakes, S.
    Klocke, P.
    Staehli, P.
    Notz, C.
    Walkenhorst, M.
    ANIMAL, 2017, 11 (11) : 2051 - 2060
  • [23] Economic and environmental implications of wheat-crop sequences on organic dairy-farm simulations
    Abreu, D. C.
    Hoshide, A. K.
    Mallory, E. B.
    Roche, E. H.
    Oliveira, A. S.
    Kersbergen, R. J.
    Lana, R. P.
    Fonseca, M. A.
    CROP & PASTURE SCIENCE, 2016, 67 (11): : 1127 - 1138
  • [24] Spring calving versus split calving: effects on farm, processor and industry profitability for the Irish dairy industry
    Geary, U.
    Lopez-Villalobos, N.
    Garrick, D. J.
    Shalloo, L.
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 2014, 152 (03): : 448 - 463
  • [25] Monocropping vs mixed cropping systems under a changing climate: Smallholder farmers' perceptions and farm profitability in Eastern Rwanda
    Leonidas, Hashakimana
    Toru, Tessema
    Fidele, Niyitanga
    Watabaji, Mulugeta D.
    Gelete, Tadele Bedo
    Hubert, Hirwa
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS, 2024, 24
  • [26] The 2002 Farm Bill Commodity Programs: a tool for improving rotation crop profitability and reducing risk in potato cropping systems
    Halloran, J
    APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2006, 13 (03) : 171 - 175
  • [27] Relationships between farm size and operational performances in irrigated cropping systems under contrasted governance systems in Punjab (Pakistan)
    Ahmad, Sajjad
    Perret, Sylvain-Roger
    Nawaz, Rab
    Shivakoti, Ganesh Prasad
    JOURNAL OF FOOD AGRICULTURE & ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 10 (02): : 463 - 467
  • [28] Effects of feed particle size at dietary presence of added organic acids on caecal parameters and the prevalence of Salmonella in fattening pigs on farm and at slaughter
    Visscher, C. F.
    Winter, P.
    Verspohl, J.
    Stratmann-Selke, J.
    Upmann, M.
    Beyerbach, M.
    Kamphues, J.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL PHYSIOLOGY AND ANIMAL NUTRITION, 2009, 93 (04) : 423 - 430
  • [29] Carbon footprints, mitigation effects and economic performance of dairy farm systems in Inner Mongolia
    Wei, Sha
    Ledgard, Stewart
    Fan, Junming
    Tian, Yanfeng
    Dong, Hongmin
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2024, 214
  • [30] Nitrogen and carbon footprints of dairy farm systems in China and New Zealand, as influenced by productivity, feed sources and mitigations
    Ledgard, Stewart F.
    Wei, Sha
    Wang, Xiaoqin
    Falconer, Shelley
    Zhang, Nannan
    Zhang, Xiying
    Ma, Lin
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2019, 213 : 155 - 163