Efficacy of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy and interval debulking surgery in women with advanced uterine serous carcinoma

被引:3
|
作者
Chambers, Laura M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chau, Danielle [1 ]
Yao, Meng [4 ]
Costales, Anthony B. [5 ]
Rose, Peter G. [1 ]
Michener, Chad M. [1 ]
Debernardo, Robert [1 ]
Vargas, Roberto [1 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Div Gynecol Oncol Obstet Gynecol, Womens Hlth Inst, Desk A81,9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, James Canc Hosp, Div Gynecol Oncol, Med Ctr, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, Solove Res Inst, Med Ctr, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[4] Cleveland Clin, Dept Qualitat Hlth Sci, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[5] Baylor Coll Med, Dept Gynecol Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
来源
关键词
Uterine serous carcinoma; Cytoreductive surgery; Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy; Interval debulking surgery; CYTOREDUCTIVE SURGERY; NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; ENDOMETRIAL CANCER; SURVIVAL; PATTERNS;
D O I
10.1016/j.gore.2021.100876
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective(s): To investigate the efficacy and safety of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) at the time of iterval debulking surgery (IDS) in women with advanced uterine serous carcinoma (USC) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Methods: An IRB-approved single-institution prospective registry was queried to identify women with inciden-tally identified USC at the time of IDS + HIPEC for high-grade serous carcinoma. Patient demographic, oncologic, and surgical outcomes data were recorded. Univariate analysis determined progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: In total, seven patients were found to have advanced USC after undergoing IDS + HIPEC, with a median age of 64.5 years. The majority had stage IV, (n = 6, 85.7%), MMR proficient (n = 5, 71.4%), p53 mutant (n = 6, 85.1%) USC. The median pre-operative CA125 was 24.0U/mL. HIPEC regimen was cisplatin (n = 3, 42.9%) or cisplatin with paclitaxel (n = 4, 57.1%). All patients underwent optimal cytoreduction, with 71.4% (n = 5) having no gross residual disease. Accordion post-operative complications were mild in 14.3% (n = 1), moderate in 57.1% (n = 4) and severe in 14.3% (n = 1); 14.3% (n = 1) had no complications. The median length of stay was 6.5 days (IQR 4-8 days) with a median time to chemotherapy of 33.0 days. The median PFS was 14.0 months (95% CI 3.5-20.8 months), and the median OS was 27.0 months (95% CI 5.1-not reached). Conclusions: In this small, prospective series, we demonstrate that IDS + HIPEC is well tolerated in patients with USC and is associated with favorable PFS and OS following NACT. Further prospective investigation is needed to validate these promising findings in larger, heterogeneous cohorts of women with advanced USC who are not candidates for primary surgical management.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Efficacy of Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in the Management of Malignant Ascites
    Reese W. Randle
    Katrina R. Swett
    Douglas S. Swords
    Perry Shen
    John H. Stewart
    Edward A. Levine
    Konstantinos I. Votanopoulos
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2014, 21 : 1474 - 1479
  • [42] Cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for the treatment of primary peritoneal serous carcinoma: Results of a Chinese retrospective study
    Sun, Jian-Hua
    Ji, Zhong-He
    Peng, Kai-Wen
    Wu, Hai-Tao
    Zhang, Qian
    Yonemura, Yukata
    Li, Yan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYPERTHERMIA, 2016, 32 (03) : 289 - 297
  • [43] Management of Wolfiann Duct Carcinoma with Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy
    Christopher, Wade O.
    Ray, Ashley G.
    Seawright, Ashley H.
    Wynn, James J.
    Earl, T. Mark
    Anderson, Chris D.
    Orr, W. Shannon
    Ridgway, Mildred R.
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2019, 85 (04) : E220 - E221
  • [44] Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in conjunction with surgery for the treatment of recurrent ovarian carcinoma
    Helm, C. William
    Randall-Whitis, Leslie
    Martin, Robert S., III
    Metzinger, Daniel S.
    Gordinier, Mary E.
    Parker, Lynn P.
    Edwards, Robert P.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2007, 105 (01) : 90 - 96
  • [45] Gastric Volvulus: A Delayed Surgical Complication After Debulking and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Advanced Ovarian Cancer
    Ghattas, Souad
    Maalouf, Hani
    Hadeer, Ribal Aby
    Elias, Fawzi
    Abou Zeid, Hadi Khaled
    Kahy, Anthony
    Wakim, Raja
    ACG CASE REPORTS JOURNAL, 2023, 10 (02)
  • [46] PRIMARY DEBULKING SURGERY OR NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY FOLLOWED BY INTERVAL DEBULKING SURGERY FOR PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED EPITHELIAL OVARIAN CANCER?
    Mansouri, H.
    Zemni, I.
    Ben Safta, I.
    Achouri, L.
    Ben Hassouna, J.
    Hechiche, M.
    Chargui, R.
    Rahal, K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2019, 29 : A120 - A120
  • [47] Sarcopenia is a predictor of chemotherapy response score at the time of interval debulking surgery in advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma
    Morton, Molly
    Wood, Nicole
    Alhilli, Mariam
    Kollikonda, Swapna
    Yao, Meng
    Barnard, Hannah
    Shah, Shetal
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2021, 162 : S271 - S271
  • [48] Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) after primary debulking surgery in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: Is BRCA mutational status making the difference?
    Ghirardi, Valentina
    De Felice, Francesca
    D'Indinosante, Marco
    Bernardini, Federica
    Giudice, Maria Teresa
    Fagotti, Anna
    Scambia, Giovanni
    CANCER TREATMENT AND RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 31
  • [49] Advanced endometrial carcinoma: primary debulking surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy?
    Guyon, Frederic
    Stoeckle, Eberhard
    Thomas, Laurence
    Petit, Adeline
    Sire, Marie
    Floquet, Anne
    BULLETIN DU CANCER, 2012, 99 (01) : 43 - 49
  • [50] Clinical significance of primary debulking surgery and neoadjuvant chemotherapy-interval debulking surgery in advanced ovarian cancer
    Nishio, Shin
    Ushijima, Kimio
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 50 (04) : 379 - 386