Development of Visual Field Screening Procedures: A Case Study of the Octopus Perimeter

被引:13
|
作者
Turpin, Andrew [1 ]
Myers, Jonathan S. [2 ]
McKendrick, Allison M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Dept Comp & Informat Syst, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
[2] Wills Eye Hosp & Res Inst, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] Univ Melbourne, Dept Optometry & Vis Sci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
来源
关键词
visual field; screening; glaucoma; FREQUENCY-DOUBLING TECHNOLOGY; AUTOMATED PERIMETRY; GLAUCOMA; VARIABILITY; SUPRATHRESHOLD; PATTERN; PERFORMANCE; LOCATIONS; DEFECTS; POINTS;
D O I
10.1167/tvst.5.3.3
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: We develop a methodology for designing perimetric screening procedures, using Octopus perimeters as a case study. Methods: The process has three stages: analytically determining specificity and number of presentations required for different multisampling suprathreshold schemes at a single location of the visual field, ranking visual field locations by their positive predictive value (PPV) for glaucoma, and determining a pass/fail criteria for the test. For the case study the Octopus G-program visual field test pattern is used, and a dataset of 385 glaucoma and 86 normal patients. Results: Using a 1-of-3 sampling strategy at a level equal to the 95 percentile of normal observers gave the most robust specificity under the influences of false-negative responses using an average of 1.5 presentations per location. The PPV analysis gave 19 locations that completely classified our glaucomatous data. A further 9 points were added to screen for nonglaucomatous loss. The final stage found that insisting that 3 locations are missed for the screening to fail gave a simulated specificity and sensitivity of approximately 95% for unreliable responders. Conclusions: Our method gives a principled approach to choosing between the many parameters of a visual field screening procedure. We have developed a procedure for the Octopus that should terminate in less than 1 minute for normal observers with high specificity and sensitivity to glaucoma.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Study of Procedures Used for Screening Elementary School Children for Visual Defects
    Crane, Marian M.
    Scobee, Richard G.
    Foote, Franklin M.
    Green, Earl L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND THE NATIONS HEALTH, 1952, 42 (11): : 1430 - 1439
  • [32] Prevent blindness America visual field screening study
    Sponsel, WE
    Tu, E
    Lee, B
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1996, 121 (06) : 735 - 735
  • [33] Clinical applications of a visual field perimeter with binocular video imaging
    Charlier, J.
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2017, 95
  • [34] Visual Field Testing with Head-Mounted Perimeter 'imo'
    Matsumoto, Chota
    Yamao, Sayaka
    Nomoto, Hiroki
    Takada, Sonoko
    Okuyama, Sachiko
    Kimura, Shinji
    Yamanaka, Kenzo
    Aihara, Makoto
    Shimomura, Yoshikazu
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (08):
  • [35] VARIATION IN VISUAL-FIELD MEASUREMENTS WITH AN AUTOMATED PERIMETER - REPLY
    WILENSKY, J
    JOONDEPH, B
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1984, 97 (06) : 801 - 802
  • [36] STUDY OF PERIMETRIC DEFICIT VARIATIONS IN OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA USING THE OCTOPUS AUTOMATIC PERIMETER
    FONTAN, P
    MAILLARD, P
    BEC, P
    MATHIS, A
    CHARLET, JP
    JOURNAL FRANCAIS D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 1985, 8 (02): : 165 - 171
  • [37] Comparison of Visual Field Measurement with Heidelberg Edge Perimeter and Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer in Patients with Ocular Hypertension
    Kaczorowski, Kamil
    Mulak, Malgorzata
    Szumny, Dorota
    Baranowska, Marta
    Jakubaszko-Jablonska, Joanna
    Misiuk-Hojlo, Marta
    ADVANCES IN CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2016, 25 (05): : 937 - 944
  • [38] GRE PIPELINE INSTALLATION PROCEDURES - A FIELD CASE STUDY
    Khalaf, A.
    Al-Tartoor, Y.
    Seibi, A. C.
    Karrech, A.
    ASME PRESSURE VESSELS AND PIPING CONFERENCE, VOL 7: OPERATIONS, APPLICATIONS AND COMPONENTS, 2010, : 287 - 295
  • [40] Comparison of visual field sensitivities between the Medmont automated perimeter and the Humphrey field analyser
    Landers, John
    Sharma, Alok
    Goldberg, Ivan
    Graham, Stuart L.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2010, 38 (03): : 273 - 276