Trends and Opportunities for Bridging Prevention Science and US Federal Policy

被引:3
|
作者
Scott, J. Taylor [1 ]
Prendergast, Sarah [2 ]
Demeusy, Elizabeth [3 ]
McGuire, Kristina [4 ]
Crowley, Max [1 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Urban Inst, Washington, DC 20037 USA
[3] Medstar Georgetown Univ Hosp, Washington, DC USA
[4] Dept Juvenile Justice, Richmond, VA USA
关键词
Evidence-based policy; Juvenile justice; Research use; Legislation; Delinquency; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1007/s11121-022-01403-2
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Prevention science sheds light on complex social policy problems, yet its social impact cannot reach full potential without the uptake of research evidence by policymakers. This mixed-methods study examined the US federal legislation pertaining to justice-involved youth to reveal opportunities for strengthening the use of prevention science in legislation. The results indicated that research language, particularly references to the type of study (e.g., longitudinal) or methodology (e.g., data mining), within bills predicted bill progression out of committee and enactment. Rigorous scientific methods may either lend credence to a bill during its progression in the legislative process or may be infused in language during mark-up and negotiation of bills that successfully progress in Congress. In-depth bill coding illustrated the ways that research has been used in legislation to define problems, reinforce effective practice, generate knowledge through research and evaluation, and disseminate findings. A prominent implication of these findings is that policies could be used to improve data monitoring and evaluation capacity in ways that enhance the implementation of evidence-based interventions. The comprehensive use of research in legislation increases the likelihood that policies reach their intended outcomes and benefit those they are designed to serve.
引用
收藏
页码:1333 / 1342
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Federal Funding for Food Science - Challenges and Opportunities
    Foegeding, E. Allen
    Sathe, Shridhar
    Lawton, Robert O.
    Salunkhe, D. K.
    JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE, 2015, 80 (11)
  • [22] OPPORTUNITIES IN MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING - THE FEDERAL RESPONSE
    BROMLEY, DA
    AMERICAN CERAMIC SOCIETY BULLETIN, 1992, 71 (04): : 585 - 586
  • [23] Academic Advocacy: Opportunities to Influence Health and Science Policy Under US Lobbying Law
    Fernandez Lynch, Holly
    Bateman-House, Alison
    Rivera, Suzanne M.
    ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2020, 95 (01) : 44 - 51
  • [24] POLICY Federal boost for German science
    Schiermeier, Quirin
    NATURE, 2014, 510 (7503) : 19 - 19
  • [25] CALL TO REMAKE FEDERAL SCIENCE POLICY
    不详
    NATURE, 1970, 228 (5271) : 497 - &
  • [26] FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AND SOCIAL SCIENCE POLICY
    RIECKEN, HW
    ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, 1971, 394 (MAR): : 100 - 113
  • [27] Research and action for bridging science and practice in prevention
    Saul, Janet
    Wandersman, Abraham
    Flaspohler, Paul
    Duffy, Jennifer
    Lubell, Keri
    Noonan, Rita
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 41 (3-4) : 165 - 170
  • [28] Science, Policy, and the US Congress
    Goldston, David
    CELL, 2009, 139 (04) : 647 - 648
  • [29] Inventing US science policy
    Blanpied, WA
    PHYSICS TODAY, 1998, 51 (02) : 34 - 40
  • [30] The future of US science policy
    Ehlers, VJ
    SCIENCE, 1998, 279 (5349) : 302 - 302