Investigation of an algorithm for anti HCV EIA reactivity in blood donor screening in Turkey in the absence of nucleic acid amplification screening

被引:6
|
作者
Karakoc, Ayse Esra [1 ]
Berkem, Rukiye [1 ]
Irmak, Hasan [2 ]
Demiroz, Ali Pekcan [2 ]
Yenicesu, Idil [3 ]
Ertugrul, Nigar [4 ]
Arslan, Onder [5 ]
Kemahli, Sabri [6 ]
Yilmaz, Sevinc [7 ]
Ozcebe, Osman [8 ]
Kara, Abdurrahman [9 ]
Ozet, Gulsum [10 ]
Acikgoz, Ziya Cibali [11 ]
Acikgoz, Tulin [12 ]
机构
[1] MoH, Ankara Training & Reseach Hosp, Ctr Blood, Med Microbiol Dept, Ankara, Turkey
[2] MoH, Ankara Training & Res Hosp, Infect Dis Dept, Ankara, Turkey
[3] Gazi Univ Hosp, Blood Ctr, Ankara, Turkey
[4] MoH, Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training & Res Hosp, Ankara, Turkey
[5] Ankara Univ Hosp, Ibni Sina Hosp, Blood Ctr, Ankara, Turkey
[6] Ankara Univ Hosp, Serpil Akdag Blood Ctr, Ankara, Turkey
[7] MoH, Yuksek Ihtisas Training & Res Hosp, Blood Ctr, Ankara, Turkey
[8] Hacettepe Univ Hosp, Hosp Blood Ctr, Ankara, Turkey
[9] MoH, Sami Ulus Childrens Hosp, Blood Ctr, Ankara, Turkey
[10] MoH, Numune Training & Res Hosp, Blood Ctr, Ankara, Turkey
[11] MoH, Ataturk Training & Res Hosp, Blood Ctr, Ankara, Turkey
[12] MoH, Oncol Training & Res Hosp, Blood Ctr, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Blood donors; Hepatitis C virus; Nucleic acid amplification techniques; Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; HEPATITIS-C VIRUS; SEROPREVALENCE; ISTANBUL; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.transci.2017.08.025
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: In this study we aimed to propose an algorithm for initial anti HCV EIA reactive blood donations in Turkey where nucleic acid amplification tests are not yet obligatory for donor screening. Methods: A total of 416 anti HCV screening test reactive donor samples collected from 13 blood centers from three cities in Turkey were tested in duplicate by Ortho HCV Ab Version 3.0 and Radim HCV Ab. All the repeat reactive samples were tested by INNO-LIA HCV Ab 3.0 or Chiron RIBA HCV 3.0 and Abbott Real Time HCV. Intra-assay correlations were calculated with Pearson r test. ROC analysis was used to study the relationship between EIA tests and the confirmatory tests. Results: The number of repeat reactive results with Ortho EIA were 221 (53.1%) whereas that of microElA, 62 (14.9%). Confirmed positivity rate was 14.6% (33/226) by RIBA and 10.6% (24/226) by NAT. Reactive PCR results were predicted with 100% sensitivity and 95% specificity with S/CO levels of 8.1 with Ortho EIA and 3.4 with microElA. Conclusions: Repeat reactivity rates declined with a second HCV antibody assay. Samples repeat reactive with one HCV antibody test and negative with the other were all NAT negative. All the NAT reactive samples were RIBA positive. None of the RIBA indeterminate or negative samples were NAT reactive. Considering the threshold values for EIA kits determined by ROC analysis NAT was decided to be performed for the samples above the threshold value and a validated supplemental HCV antibody test for the samples below. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:732 / 737
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条