Effectiveness of a decision aid for promoting colorectal cancer screening in Spain: a randomized trial

被引:14
|
作者
Perestelo-Perez, Lilisbeth [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Rivero-Santana, Amado [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Torres-Castano, Alezandra [4 ]
Ramos-Garcia, Vanesa [4 ]
Alvarez-Perez, Yolanda [4 ]
Gonzalez-Hernandez, Nerea [2 ,5 ]
Buron, Andrea [2 ,6 ]
Pignone, Michael [7 ]
Serrano-Aguilar, Pedro [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Canary Isl Hlth Serv SESCS, Evaluat Unit, S-N 38109 El Rosario, Tenerife, Spain
[2] Hlth Serv Res Chron Patients Network REDISSEC, Tenerife, Spain
[3] Ctr Biomed Res Canary Isl CIBICAN, Tenerife, Spain
[4] Canary Isl Fdn Hlth Res FUNCANIS, Tenerife, Spain
[5] Hosp Galdakao Usansolo, Res Unit, Bilbao, Bizkaia, Spain
[6] Hosp Mar, Epidemiol & Evaluat Unit, Barcelona, Spain
[7] Univ Texas Austin, Dell Med Sch, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
Colorectal cancer screening; Decision aid; Patient involvement; Primary care; Randomized controlled trial; Shared decision-making; Spain; PREDICTORS; INTERVENTIONS;
D O I
10.1186/s12911-019-0739-6
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) screening has shown to reduce incidence and mortality rates, and therefore is widely recommended for people above 50years-old. However, despite the implementation of population-based screening programs in several countries, uptake rates are still low. Decision aids (DAs) may help patients to make informed decisions about CRC screening.MethodsWe performed a randomized controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of a DA developed to promote CRC screening, with patients from two primary care centers in Spain who never had underwent CRC screening. Contrary to center B (n=24), Center A (n=83) attended patients from an area where the population-based screening program was not implemented at that moment. Outcome measures were decisional conflict, knowledge of the disease and available screening options, intention to uptake the test, and concordance between patients' goals/concerns and intention.ResultsIn center A, there were significant differences favoring the DA in decisional conflict (p<0.001) and knowledge (p<0.001). The absolute differences favoring DA group in intention to undergo fecal occult blood test (10.5%) and colonoscopy (13.7%) were significant only before correction for attenuation. In center B the differences were significant only for knowledge (p<0.001). Patients' goals and concerns regarding the screening did not significantly predict their intention, and therefore we could not calculate a measure of concordance between the two constructs.ConclusionsA DA improved the decisional process of participants who had never been invited to participate in the Spanish public CRC screening program, replicating previous results in this field. Future research is needed to identify subgroups that could benefit more from these interventions.Trial registrationInternational Standard Registered Clinical/social Study Number: ISRCTN98108615 (Retrospectively registered on 27 December 2018).
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The LEAD trial - the effectiveness of a decision aid on decision making among citizens with lower educational attainment who have not participated in FIT-based colorectal cancer screening in Denmark: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Gabel, Pernille
    Larsen, Mette Bach
    Kirkegaard, Pia
    Edwards, Adrian
    Andersen, Berit
    TRIALS, 2018, 19
  • [32] The Role of Personalised Choice in Decision Support: A Randomized Controlled Trial of an Online Decision Aid for Prostate Cancer Screening
    Salkeld, Glenn
    Cunich, Michelle
    Dowie, Jack
    Howard, Kirsten
    Patel, Manish I.
    Mann, Graham
    Lipworth, Wendy
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (04):
  • [33] THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A LITERACY-SENSITIVE WEB-BASED COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING PATIENT DECISION AID
    Miller, D. P.
    Spangler, J. G.
    Case, L. D.
    Singh, S.
    Pignone, M. P.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2009, 24 : 183 - 183
  • [34] Lung Cancer Screening Decision Aid Designed for a Primary Care Setting A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Schapira, Marilyn M.
    Hubbard, Rebecca A.
    Whittle, Jeff
    Vachani, Anil
    Kaminstein, Dana
    Chhatre, Sumedha
    Rodriguez, Keri L.
    Bastian, Lori A.
    Kravetz, Jeffrey D.
    Asan, Onur
    Prigge, Jason M.
    Meline, Jessica
    Schrand, Susan
    Ibarra, Jennifer V.
    Dye, Deborah A.
    Rieder, Julie B.
    Frempong, Jemimah O.
    Fraenkel, Liana
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2023, 6 (08) : E2330452
  • [35] The Effects of the Nurse Navigation Program in Promoting Colorectal Cancer Screening Behaviors: a Randomized Controlled Trial
    Temucin, Elif
    Nahcivan, Nursen O.
    JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, 2020, 35 (01) : 112 - 124
  • [36] THE ROLE OF PERSONALIZED CHOICE: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF AN ONLINE DECISION AID FOR PROSTATE CANCER SCREENING
    Salkeld, Glenn
    Cunich, Michelle
    Dowie, Jack
    Howard, Kirsten
    Mann, Graham
    Patel, Manish
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (04): : E511 - E511
  • [37] Promoting culturally appropriate colorectal cancer screening through a health educator - A randomized controlled trial
    Tu, Shin-Ping
    Taylor, Vicky
    Yasui, Yutaka
    Chun, Alan
    Yip, Mei-Po
    Acorda, Elizabeth
    Li, Lin
    Bastani, Roshan
    CANCER, 2006, 107 (05) : 959 - 966
  • [38] The Effects of the Nurse Navigation Program in Promoting Colorectal Cancer Screening Behaviors: a Randomized Controlled Trial
    Elif Temucin
    Nursen O. Nahcivan
    Journal of Cancer Education, 2020, 35 : 112 - 124
  • [39] Effectiveness of a decision aid for patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial
    Rivero-Santana, A.
    Torrente-Jimenez, R. S.
    Perestelo-Perez, L.
    Torres-Castano, A.
    Ramos-Garcia, V.
    Bilbao, A.
    Escobar, A.
    Serrano-Aguilar, P.
    Feijoo-Cid, M.
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2021, 29 (09) : 1265 - 1274
  • [40] Randomized trial of a decision aid for individuals considering genetic testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer risk
    Wakefield, Claire E.
    Meiser, Bettina
    Homewood, Judi
    Ward, Robyn
    O'Donnell, Sheridan
    Kirk, Judy
    CANCER, 2008, 113 (05) : 956 - 965