α-Si:H/CsI(Tl) flat-panel versus computed radiography for chest imaging applications:: image quality metrics measurement

被引:30
|
作者
Liu, XM [1 ]
Shaw, CC [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Imaging Phys, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
alpha-Si : H/CsI(Tl) flat-panel detector; computed radiography; digital radiography; modulation transfer function; noise power spectra; noise equivalent quanta; detective quantum efficiency;
D O I
10.1118/1.1625102
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Amorphous silicon (a-Si:H) flat-panel (FP) imaging systems have recently become commercially available for both chest and mammographic imaging applications. It has been shown that this new detector technology offers better image quality and various operational advantages over the computed radiography (CR) which to date has been the most widely implemented and used digital radiography technique. However, most image quality measurements reported on flat-panel systems have been performed on prototype systems in laboratories while those for CR systems were typically independently performed and reported on in separate studies. To directly compare the two technologies, we have measured the image properties for a commercial amorphous silicon/cesium iodide [a-Si:H/Csl(T1)] flat-panel based digital chest system and a commercial CR system under clinical imaging conditions. In this paper, measurements of image quality metrics, including the modulation transfer functions (MTFs), noise power spectra (NPSs), and detective quantum efficiencies (DQEs), for the FP and CR systems are presented and compared. Methods and issues related to these measurements are discussed. The results show that the flat-panel system has slightly lower MTF but significantly higher DQEs than the CR system. The DQEs of the flat-panel system were found to increase with the exposure while those of the CR system decrease slightly with the exposure. (C) 2004 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:98 / 110
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Dynamic chest radiography: flat-panel detector (FPD) based functional X-ray imaging
    Tanaka R.
    Radiological Physics and Technology, 2016, 9 (2) : 139 - 153
  • [22] Comparison of the image quality of a storage phospor system and a flat-panel detector in feline thoracic radiography
    Ludewig, E.
    Werrmann, A.
    Gosch, D.
    Oechtering, G.
    TIERAERZTLICHE PRAXIS AUSGABE KLEINTIERE HEIMTIERE, 2010, 38 (06): : 355 - 366
  • [23] Comparing the Image Quality of a Mobile Flat-Panel Computed Tomography and a Multidetector Computed Tomography A Phantom Study
    Neubauer, Jakob
    Voigt, Johannes M.
    Lang, Hannah
    Scheuer, Carsten
    Goerke, Sebastian M.
    Langer, Mathias
    Fiebich, Martin
    Kotter, Elmar
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2014, 49 (07) : 491 - 497
  • [24] Flat-panel-detector chest radiography: Effect of tube voltage on image quality
    Uffmann, M
    Neitzel, U
    Prokop, M
    Kabalan, N
    Weber, M
    Herold, CJ
    Schaefer-Prokop, C
    RADIOLOGY, 2005, 235 (02) : 642 - 650
  • [25] Image quality and radiation dose on digital chest imaging: Comparison of amorphous silicon and amorphous selenium flat-panel systems
    Bacher, Klaus
    Smeets, Peter
    Vereecken, Ludo
    De Hauwere, An
    Duyck, Philippe
    De Man, Robert
    Verstraete, Koenraad
    Thierens, Hubert
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2006, 187 (03) : 630 - 637
  • [26] Image quality of computed radiography and flat panel detector radiography: Evaluation of simulated subtle lung abnormalities
    Tagashira, H
    Arakawa, K
    Yoshimoto, M
    Yasuhara, Y
    Ikezoe, J
    Ogura, T
    RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 : 354 - 354
  • [27] Computed radiography for neonatal chest imaging: The effect of image processing on the perception of image quality
    Don, S
    Whiting, BR
    Ellinwood, JS
    Foos, DH
    Kronemer, KA
    Kraus, RA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2004, 182 (04) : 37 - 37
  • [28] Measurement of focal spot size with slit camera using computed radiography and flat-panel based digital detectors
    Rong, XJJ
    Krugh, KT
    Shepard, SJ
    Geiser, WR
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (07) : 1768 - 1775
  • [29] Measurement of focal spot size with slit camera using computed radiography and flat-panel based digital detectors
    Rong, J
    Krugh, K
    Shepard, S
    Geiser, W
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (06) : 1374 - 1374
  • [30] Digital radiography versus conventional radiography in chest imaging:: Diagnostic performance of a large-area silicon flat-panel detector in a clinical CT-controlled study
    Garmer, M
    Hennigs, SP
    Jäger, HJ
    Schrick, F
    van de Loo, T
    Jacobs, A
    Hanusch, A
    Christmann, A
    Mathias, K
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2000, 174 (01) : 75 - 80