Inequity Aversion and Fair Selling

被引:45
|
作者
Guo, Liang [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, CUHK Business Sch, Mkt, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
behavioral economics; distributional fairness; inequity aversion; reference price; pricing; BOUNDEDLY RATIONAL CUSTOMERS; MARKETING CHANNELS; PRICE; DISCLOSURE; PERCEPTIONS; INFORMATION; COMPETITION; CONTRACTS; QUALITY; MATTER;
D O I
10.1509/jmr.12.0175
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This research investigates optimal selling strategies and equilibrium welfare implications in markets with buyer inequity aversion. When buyers care about their surplus relative to seller profits but are uncertain about seller costs, buyers' fairness perceptions and, thus, their willingness to pay may be malleable and susceptible to seller influence. If a seller's optimal behavior (e.g., pricing) is not completely unvarying in variable costs, buyers can rationally make inferences about seller costs from observed seller behavior. Consequently, buyers' fairness perceptions and their willingness to pay can influence, and be influenced by, optimal selling strategies. The study characterizes a fair selling equilibrium in which optimal seller behavior and buyer perceived fairness are interactively derived. The author shows that seller ex ante profit may increase as more buyers become inequity averse. In addition, buyer ex ante surplus can be nonmonotonically influenced by an increase in the number of fair-minded buyers or in the degree of inequity aversion. These counterintuitive results pinpoint the importance of investigating the strategic interaction between buyer fairness perceptions and selling strategies. Finally, the basic model is extended to examine how the fair selling equilibrium may be influenced by cost disclosure, buyer dynamic learning, and seller competition.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 89
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Optimal incentive contracts under loss aversion and inequity aversion
    Zhou, Chi
    Peng, Jin
    Liu, Zhibing
    Dong, Binwei
    FUZZY OPTIMIZATION AND DECISION MAKING, 2019, 18 (01) : 85 - 102
  • [22] Waste Aversion Reduces Inequity Aversion Among Chinese Children
    Zhang, Zhen
    Benozio, Avi
    CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 2021, 92 (06) : 2465 - 2477
  • [23] Optimal incentive contracts under loss aversion and inequity aversion
    Chi Zhou
    Jin Peng
    Zhibing Liu
    Binwei Dong
    Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 2019, 18 : 85 - 102
  • [24] Kea show no evidence of inequity aversion
    Heaney, Megan
    Gray, Russell D.
    Taylor, Alex H.
    ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE, 2017, 4 (03):
  • [25] Heterogeneity, inequity aversion, and group performance
    Koelle, Felix
    Sliwka, Dirk
    Zhou, Nannan
    SOCIAL CHOICE AND WELFARE, 2016, 46 (02) : 263 - 286
  • [26] Parrots do not show inequity aversion
    Krasheninnikova, Anastasia
    Brucks, Desiree
    Buffenoir, Nina
    Blanco, Daniel Rivas
    Soulet, Delphine
    von Bayern, Auguste
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [27] Inequity aversion in rats, Rattus norvegicus
    Oberliessen, Lina
    Hernandez-Lallement, Julen
    Schaeble, Sandra
    van Wingerden, Marijn
    Seinstra, Maayke
    Kalenscher, Tobias
    ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2016, 115 : 157 - 166
  • [28] Parrots do not show inequity aversion
    Anastasia Krasheninnikova
    Désirée Brucks
    Nina Buffenoir
    Dániel Rivas Blanco
    Delphine Soulet
    Auguste von Bayern
    Scientific Reports, 9
  • [29] Inequity aversion and the stability of majority rule
    Le, Minh Tung
    Saporiti, Alejandro
    PUBLIC CHOICE, 2024,
  • [30] Ex ante contracting with inequity aversion
    Choi, Kangsik
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2007, 39 (7-9) : 1139 - 1145