Inequity Aversion and Fair Selling

被引:45
|
作者
Guo, Liang [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, CUHK Business Sch, Mkt, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
behavioral economics; distributional fairness; inequity aversion; reference price; pricing; BOUNDEDLY RATIONAL CUSTOMERS; MARKETING CHANNELS; PRICE; DISCLOSURE; PERCEPTIONS; INFORMATION; COMPETITION; CONTRACTS; QUALITY; MATTER;
D O I
10.1509/jmr.12.0175
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This research investigates optimal selling strategies and equilibrium welfare implications in markets with buyer inequity aversion. When buyers care about their surplus relative to seller profits but are uncertain about seller costs, buyers' fairness perceptions and, thus, their willingness to pay may be malleable and susceptible to seller influence. If a seller's optimal behavior (e.g., pricing) is not completely unvarying in variable costs, buyers can rationally make inferences about seller costs from observed seller behavior. Consequently, buyers' fairness perceptions and their willingness to pay can influence, and be influenced by, optimal selling strategies. The study characterizes a fair selling equilibrium in which optimal seller behavior and buyer perceived fairness are interactively derived. The author shows that seller ex ante profit may increase as more buyers become inequity averse. In addition, buyer ex ante surplus can be nonmonotonically influenced by an increase in the number of fair-minded buyers or in the degree of inequity aversion. These counterintuitive results pinpoint the importance of investigating the strategic interaction between buyer fairness perceptions and selling strategies. Finally, the basic model is extended to examine how the fair selling equilibrium may be influenced by cost disclosure, buyer dynamic learning, and seller competition.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 89
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] It's not fair: Folk intuitions about disadvantageous and advantageous inequity aversion
    Shaw, Alex
    Choshen-Hillel, Shoham
    JUDGMENT AND DECISION MAKING, 2017, 12 (03): : 208 - 223
  • [3] Fair is Fine, but More is Better: Limits to Inequity Aversion in the Domestic Dog
    Alexandra Horowitz
    Social Justice Research, 2012, 25 : 195 - 212
  • [4] Inequity aversion may increase inequity
    Montero, Maria
    ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2007, 117 (519): : C192 - C204
  • [5] Inequity aversion in capuchins?
    Henrich, J
    NATURE, 2004, 428 (6979) : 139 - 139
  • [6] Inequity aversion in capuchins?
    Joseph Henrich
    Nature, 2004, 428 : 139 - 139
  • [7] Inequity aversion revisited
    Yang, Yang
    Onderstal, Sander
    Schram, Arthur
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 54 : 1 - 16
  • [8] Pigouvian tax aversion and inequity aversion in the lab
    Kallbekken, Steffen
    Kroll, Stephan
    Cherry, Todd L.
    ECONOMICS BULLETIN, 2010, 30 (03): : 1914 - 1921
  • [9] The Bright Side of Inequity Aversion
    Li, Xi
    Li, Xinlong
    MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2023, 69 (07) : 4210 - 4227
  • [10] Inequity aversion and team incentives
    Rey-Biel, Pedro
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2008, 110 (02): : 297 - 320