Contemporary trends in the level of evidence in general thoracic surgery clinical research

被引:3
|
作者
Choe, Se-In [1 ]
Ben-Avi, Ronny [1 ]
Begum, Housne [1 ]
Pearce, Kendra [1 ]
Mehta, Meera [1 ]
Agzarian, John [1 ]
Finley, Christian J. [1 ]
Hanna, Wael C. [1 ]
Farrokhyar, Forough [1 ,2 ]
Shargall, Yaron [1 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Surg, Div Thorac Surg, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Dept Hlth Res Methods Evidence & Impact, Hamilton, ON, Canada
关键词
Level of evidence; Thoracic surgery; Clinical research; Evidence-based medicine; TRIALS; HIERARCHY;
D O I
10.1093/ejcts/ezab460
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES: The large volume of scientific publications and the increasing emphasis on high-quality evidence for clinical decisionmaking present daily challenges to all clinicians, including thoracic surgeons. The objective of this study was to evaluate the contemporary trend in the level of evidence (LOE) for thoracic surgery clinical research. METHODS: All clinical research articles published between January 2010 and December 2017 in 3 major general thoracic surgery journals were reviewed. Five authors independently reviewed the abstracts of each publication and assigned a LOE to each of them using the 2011 Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine classification scheme. Data extracted from eligible abstracts included study type, study size, country of primary author and type of study designs. Three auditing processes were conducted to establish working definitions and the process was validated with a research methodologist and 2 senior thoracic surgeons. Intra-class correlation coefficient was calculated to assess inter-rater agreement. Chi-square test and Spearman correlation analysis were then used to compare the LOE between journals and by year of publication. RESULTS: Of 2028 publications reviewed and scored, 29 (1.4%) were graded level I, 75 (3.7%) were graded level II, 471 (23.2%) were graded level III, 1420 (70.2%) were graded level IV and 33 (1.6%) were graded level V (lowest level). Most publications (94.9%) were of lower-level evidence (III-V). There was an overall increasing trend in the lower LOE (P < 0.001). Inter-rater reliability was substantial with 95.5% (95%, confidence interval: 0.95-0.96) level of agreement between reviewers. CONCLUSIONS: General thoracic surgery literature consists mostly of lower LOE studies. The number of lower levels of evidence is dominating the recent publications, potentially indicating a need to increase the commitment to produce and disseminate higher-level evidence in general thoracic surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:1012 / 1019
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database: 2020 Update on Outcomes and Research
    Servais, Elliot L.
    Towe, Christopher W.
    Brown, Lisa M.
    Broderick, Stephen R.
    Block, Mark I.
    Burfeind, William R.
    Mitchell, John D.
    Schipper, Paul H.
    Raymond, Daniel P.
    David, Elizabeth A.
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2020, 110 (03): : 768 - 775
  • [22] The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database: 2024 Update on Outcomes and Research
    Towe, Christopher W.
    Kuo, Elbert Y.
    Feczko, Andrew
    Kidane, Biniam
    Khullar, Onkar, V
    Seder, Christopher W.
    Schipper, Paul H.
    Donahue, James M.
    David, Elizabeth A.
    Jones, Leigh Ann
    Habib, Robert
    Elhalabi, Zouheir
    Brown, Lisa M.
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2025, 119 (04): : 733 - 743
  • [23] Current trends in thoracic surgery
    Chen-Yoshikawa, Toyofumi F.
    Fukui, Takayuki
    Nakamura, Shota
    Ito, Toshinari
    Kadomatsu, Yuka
    Tsubouchi, Hideki
    Ueno, Harushi
    Sugiyama, Tomoshi
    Goto, Masaki
    Mori, Shunsuke
    Ozeki, Naoki
    Hakiri, Shuhei
    Kawaguchi, Koji
    NAGOYA JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 82 (02): : 161 - 174
  • [24] Organization of clinical research - In general and visceral surgery
    Schneider, M.
    Werner, J.
    Weitz, J.
    Buechler, M. W.
    CHIRURG, 2010, 81 (04): : 341 - 346
  • [25] Contemporary trends in student selection of medical specialties - The potential impact on general surgery
    Bland, KI
    Isaacs, G
    ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2002, 137 (03) : 259 - 267
  • [26] GENERAL SURGERY AND THORACIC SURGEON
    SAMSON, PC
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1973, 126 (02): : 127 - 132
  • [27] The general practitioner and thoracic surgery
    Burnett, WE
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1938, 218 : 670 - 676
  • [28] Complications of general thoracic surgery
    Pezzella, AT
    Adebonojo, SA
    Hooker, SG
    Mabogunje, OA
    Conlan, AA
    CURRENT PROBLEMS IN SURGERY, 2000, 37 (11) : 739 - 858
  • [29] Ten-Year Trends in Level of Evidence in Hand Surgery
    Tompkins, Reid E.
    Polmear, Michael M.
    Klahs, Kyle J.
    Scanaliato, John P.
    Nesti, Leon J.
    Dunn, John C.
    HAND-AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR HAND SURGERY, 2024, 19 (01): : 163 - 168
  • [30] Clinical-pathologic conference in general thoracic surgery: Cardiac lymphoma
    Battafarano, R
    Lee, R
    Patterson, GA
    Sundt, T
    Gutierrez, F
    Dehdashti, F
    Ritter, J
    Govindan, R
    Bradley, J
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2005, 130 (03): : 870 - 874