Contemporary trends in the level of evidence in general thoracic surgery clinical research

被引:3
|
作者
Choe, Se-In [1 ]
Ben-Avi, Ronny [1 ]
Begum, Housne [1 ]
Pearce, Kendra [1 ]
Mehta, Meera [1 ]
Agzarian, John [1 ]
Finley, Christian J. [1 ]
Hanna, Wael C. [1 ]
Farrokhyar, Forough [1 ,2 ]
Shargall, Yaron [1 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Surg, Div Thorac Surg, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Dept Hlth Res Methods Evidence & Impact, Hamilton, ON, Canada
关键词
Level of evidence; Thoracic surgery; Clinical research; Evidence-based medicine; TRIALS; HIERARCHY;
D O I
10.1093/ejcts/ezab460
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES: The large volume of scientific publications and the increasing emphasis on high-quality evidence for clinical decisionmaking present daily challenges to all clinicians, including thoracic surgeons. The objective of this study was to evaluate the contemporary trend in the level of evidence (LOE) for thoracic surgery clinical research. METHODS: All clinical research articles published between January 2010 and December 2017 in 3 major general thoracic surgery journals were reviewed. Five authors independently reviewed the abstracts of each publication and assigned a LOE to each of them using the 2011 Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine classification scheme. Data extracted from eligible abstracts included study type, study size, country of primary author and type of study designs. Three auditing processes were conducted to establish working definitions and the process was validated with a research methodologist and 2 senior thoracic surgeons. Intra-class correlation coefficient was calculated to assess inter-rater agreement. Chi-square test and Spearman correlation analysis were then used to compare the LOE between journals and by year of publication. RESULTS: Of 2028 publications reviewed and scored, 29 (1.4%) were graded level I, 75 (3.7%) were graded level II, 471 (23.2%) were graded level III, 1420 (70.2%) were graded level IV and 33 (1.6%) were graded level V (lowest level). Most publications (94.9%) were of lower-level evidence (III-V). There was an overall increasing trend in the lower LOE (P < 0.001). Inter-rater reliability was substantial with 95.5% (95%, confidence interval: 0.95-0.96) level of agreement between reviewers. CONCLUSIONS: General thoracic surgery literature consists mostly of lower LOE studies. The number of lower levels of evidence is dominating the recent publications, potentially indicating a need to increase the commitment to produce and disseminate higher-level evidence in general thoracic surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:1012 / 1019
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Trends in Level of Evidence in Facial Plastic Surgery Research
    Xu, Caroline C.
    Cote, David W. J.
    Chowdhury, Raiyan H.
    Morrissey, Andrew T.
    Ansari, Khalid
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2011, 127 (04) : 1499 - 1504
  • [2] An Update on Level of Evidence Trends in Facial Plastic Surgery Research
    Eggerstedt, Michael
    Shay, Aryan D.
    Brown, Hannah J.
    Ganti, Ashwin
    Varelas, Eleni
    Smith, Ryan M.
    Revenaugh, Peter C.
    FACIAL PLASTIC SURGERY & AESTHETIC MEDICINE, 2020, 22 (02) : 105 - 109
  • [3] Level of evidence of plastic surgery clinical research in Saudi Arabia
    Samargandi, Osama A.
    Makhdom, Asim M.
    Kaur, Manraj
    Awan, Basim A.
    Thoma, Achilleas
    SAUDI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 34 (11) : 1197 - 1198
  • [4] Level of evidence of clinical orthopedic surgery research in Saudi Arabia
    Makhdom, Asim M.
    AlQahtani, Saad M.
    Alsheikh, Khalid A.
    Samargandi, Osama A.
    Saran, Neil
    SAUDI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 34 (04) : 395 - 400
  • [5] Level of evidence of abdominal surgery clinical research in Saudi Arabia
    Maghrabi, Yazid
    Baeesa, Muad S.
    Kattan, Jawaher
    Altaf, Abdulmalik
    Baeesa, Saleh S.
    SAUDI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 38 (08) : 788 - 793
  • [6] General thoracic surgery - optimising opportunities at a European level
    Klepetko, W
    Aberg, T
    Bellenis, I
    Berrisford, R
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2003, 23 (06) : 857 - 858
  • [7] Levels of evidence and grades of recommendations in general thoracic surgery
    Graham, AJ
    Gelfand, G
    McFadden, SD
    Grondin, SC
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2004, 47 (06) : 461 - 465
  • [8] Clinical-pathologic conference in general thoracic surgery
    Patterson, GA
    Campbell, DB
    Cooper, J
    Suen, HC
    Allen, T
    Anderson, C
    Dehdashti, F
    Ritter, J
    Wikenheiser, K
    Arquette, M
    Safdar, S
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1999, 117 (04): : 837 - 842
  • [9] The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database: 2017 Update on Research
    Gaissert, Henning A.
    Fernandez, Felix G.
    Crabtree, Traves
    Burfeind, William R.
    Allen, Mark S.
    Block, Mark I.
    Schipper, Paul H.
    Jacobs, Jeffrey P.
    Habib, Robert H.
    Shahian, David M.
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2017, 104 (05): : 1450 - 1455
  • [10] The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database: Research Applications and Results
    Mewhort, Holly E. M.
    Ramakrishna, Harish
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2020, 34 (09) : 2297 - 2298