When bulk density methods matter: Implications for estimating soil organic carbon pools in rocky soils

被引:151
|
作者
Throop, H. L. [1 ]
Archer, S. R. [2 ]
Monger, H. C. [3 ]
Waltman, S. [4 ]
机构
[1] New Mexico State Univ, Dept Biol, Las Cruces, NM 88003 USA
[2] Univ Arizona, Sch Nat Resources & Environm, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[3] New Mexico State Univ, Dept Plant & Environm Sci, Las Cruces, NM 88003 USA
[4] Nat Resources Conservat Serv, USDA, Morgantown, WV 26505 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Carbon pools; Carbon accounting; Core method; Soil carbon;
D O I
10.1016/j.jaridenv.2011.08.020
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Resolving uncertainty in the carbon cycle is paramount to refining climate predictions. Soil organic carbon (SOC) is a major component of terrestrial C pools, and accuracy of SOC estimates are only as good as the measurements and assumptions used to obtain them. Dryland soils account for a substantial portion of global SOC, but the pool dynamics are highly uncertain. One crucial component of accurate estimates of SOC on an areal basis is bulk density (rho(b)). the mass of soil per unit volume. Here, we review methods used for calculating rho(b) and assess their prevalence. We show how treatment of coarse fragments (particles >2 mm diameter) influences rho(b) values and discuss the implications for SOC estimates in drylands. In four dryland examples, methods that varied in their treatment of coarse fragments led to substantial (up to 26%) differences in rho(b). Calculated SOC pools responded proportionally, with SOC differing by up to 518 g C m(-2). We suggest a revised method for accounting for coarse fractions in rho(b) calculations. A large portion of the world's soils, particularly in drylands, are fine enough to allow rho(b) determination with cores, but contain coarse fragments that substantially impact SOC mass estimates if not explicitly considered. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:66 / 71
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [22] Size and density fractionation of soil organic matter and the physical capacity of soils to protect organic matter
    Hassink, J
    Whitmore, AP
    Kubat, J
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 1997, 7 (1-3) : 189 - 199
  • [23] Post-agricultural restoration: Implications for dynamics of soil organic matter pools
    Kalinina, Olga
    Cherkinsky, Alexander
    Chertov, Oleg
    Goryachkin, Sergey
    Kurganova, Irina
    de Gerenyu, Valentin Lopes
    Lyuri, Dmitry
    Kuzyakov, Yakov
    Giani, Luise
    CATENA, 2019, 181
  • [24] On the use of the conventional carbon factor in estimating soil organic matter
    Read, JW
    Ridgell, RH
    SOIL SCIENCE, 1922, 13 (01) : 1 - 6
  • [25] The sorption of organic matter in soils as affected by the nature of soil carbon
    Kaiser, K
    Haumaier, L
    Zech, W
    SOIL SCIENCE, 2000, 165 (04) : 305 - 313
  • [26] Changes in Soil Organic Matter Pools and Carbon Mineralization as Influenced by Fire Severity
    Hatten, J. A.
    Zabowski, D.
    SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2009, 73 (01) : 262 - 273
  • [27] Estimation of bulk density of the mountain soils from the organic carbon content
    Kabala, Cezary
    Galka, Bernard
    SYLWAN, 2019, 163 (04): : 320 - 327
  • [28] Estimating the spatial distribution of organic carbon density for the soils of Ohio, USA
    Sandeep Kumar
    Rattan Lal
    Desheng Liu
    Rashid Rafiq
    Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2013, 23 : 280 - 296
  • [29] Estimating the spatial distribution of organic carbon density for the soils of Ohio, USA
    Kumar, Sandeep
    Lal, Rattan
    Liu, Desheng
    Rafiq, Rashid
    JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL SCIENCES, 2013, 23 (02) : 280 - 296
  • [30] The Importance of Rock Fragment Density for the Calculation of Soil Bulk Density and Soil Organic Carbon Stocks
    Mehler, Knut
    Schoening, Ingo
    Berli, Markus
    SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2014, 78 (04) : 1186 - 1191