Once-Weekly Dulaglutide with Insulin Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes: Efficacy and Safety Results from a Phase 4, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study

被引:6
|
作者
Ishii, Hitoshi [1 ]
Onishi, Yukiko [2 ]
Oura, Tomonori [3 ]
Takeuchi, Masakazu [3 ]
机构
[1] Nara Med Univ, Dept Diabetol, Kashihara, Nara, Japan
[2] Asahi Life Fdn, Inst Adult Dis, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Eli Lilly Japan KK, Med Dev Unit Japan, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
关键词
Dulaglutide; GLP-1; analog; Insulin therapy; Phase IV study; Type 2 diabetes mellitus; PEPTIDE-1 RECEPTOR AGONIST; JAPANESE PATIENTS; OPEN-LABEL; PARALLEL-GROUP; BASAL INSULIN; NON-ASIANS; GLARGINE; COMBINATION; MULTICENTER; MELLITUS;
D O I
10.1007/s13300-019-00726-8
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Although global studies have investigated the combination of dulaglutide with insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), differences in lean body mass and dulaglutide dosing can complicate the extrapolation of global study results to Japanese patients. This phase 4, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, and subsequent open-label study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of once-weekly dulaglutide 0.75 mg in combination with insulin therapy in patients with T2DM. Methods Patients enrolled in this multicenter study were Japanese with T2DM who had inadequate glycemic control (HbA1c 7.5-10.5%) with insulin therapy (basal insulin, premixed insulin, or basal/mealtime insulin) in combination with or without one or two oral antidiabetic agents (OADs). Patients were randomized in a 3:1 ratio to dulaglutide or placebo. The first 16 weeks was the double-blind period with stable insulin dosing, and patients taking placebo were switched to dulaglutide for an additional 36-week open-label period in which all patients took dulaglutide (52 weeks total). Results Patients (N = 159) were randomized to dulaglutide (n = 120) or placebo (n = 39). The least-squares (LS) mean changes from baseline in HbA1c at week 16 were dulaglutide - 1.45% and placebo 0.06%. The LS mean and 95% confidence interval for the difference were - 1.50% (- 1.73%, - 1.28%) and dulaglutide was superior to placebo. There were no significant differences between treatment groups in changes from baseline in body weight and insulin dose. The most frequently observed treatment-emergent adverse events in dulaglutide were nasopharyngitis, constipation, abdominal discomfort, nausea, and decreased appetite. The incidence rates of hypoglycemic events by week 16 were dulaglutide 42.5% and placebo 30.8% (P = 0.258). Conclusion Once-weekly dulaglutide 0.75 mg was superior to once-weekly placebo in glycemic control improvement and well tolerated in patients with T2DM in combination with insulin therapy with or without OADs. Funding Eli Lilly and Company.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 145
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The efficacy and safety of once-weekly, subcutaneous dulaglutide monotherapy compared to glimepiride in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
    Wang, W.
    Huang, C. -N.
    Young, M. -C.
    Li, P.
    Gu, L.
    Yang, J.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2015, 58 : S375 - S375
  • [22] Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Dulaglutide vs. Insulin Glargine in Combination with Metformin and/or a Sulfonylurea in Predominantly Asian Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
    Wang, Weiqing
    Ruiz, Luis Nevarez
    Filippova, Ekaterina
    Song, Ki-Ho
    Gu, Liqun
    Li, Pengfei
    Yang, Jun
    DIABETES, 2015, 64 : A74 - A74
  • [23] Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Dulaglutide vs. Insulin Glargine in Combination with Metformin and Glimepiride in Type 2 Diabetes Patients (AWARD-2)
    Giorgino, Francesco
    Benroubi, Maria
    Sun, Jui-Hung
    Zimmermann, Alan G.
    Pechtner, Valeria
    DIABETES, 2014, 63 : A87 - A87
  • [24] Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly PB-119 Monotherapy vs. Placebo in Chinese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in a Randomized Controlled Trial
    Xu, Min
    Liang, Ruifang
    DIABETES, 2023, 72
  • [25] Efficacy and safety of once-weekly insulin versus once-daily insulin in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Xue, Mei
    Shen, Pan
    Tang, Jun
    Deng, Xuan
    Dai, Zhe
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [26] Efficacy and safety of once-weekly dulaglutide in adult Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes and lower baseline body mass index
    Shi, Yongquan
    Liu, Siying
    Zhu, Jiankun
    Hong, Tianpei
    JOURNAL OF DIABETES, 2021, 13 (04) : 353 - 357
  • [27] Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide monotherapy vs placebo in subjects with Type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 1)
    Sorli, C.
    Harashima, S-I
    Tsoukas, G.
    Unger, J.
    Karsbol, J. D.
    Bain, S.
    DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2017, 34 : 145 - 145
  • [28] Efficacy and safety of once-weekly dulaglutide in combination with sulphonylurea and/or biguanide compared with once-daily insulin glargine in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, open-label, phase III, non-inferiority study
    Araki, E.
    Inagaki, N.
    Tanizawa, Y.
    Oura, T.
    Takeuchi, M.
    Imaoka, T.
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2015, 17 (10): : 994 - 1002
  • [29] Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide monotherapy versus placebo in subjects with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 1)
    Harashima, Shin-ichi
    Sorli, Christopher
    Tsoukas, George
    Unger, Jeffrey
    Karsbol, Julie Derving
    Hansen, Thomas
    Bain, Stephen
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2016, 120 : S121 - S121
  • [30] Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide monotherapy versus placebo in subjects with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 1)
    Sorli, C.
    Harashima, S. -I.
    Tsoukas, G.
    Unger, J.
    Karsbol, J. Derving
    Hansen, T.
    Bain, S.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2016, 59 : S364 - S364