Evaluation of Nucleic Acid Preservation Cards for West Nile Virus Testing in Dead Birds

被引:12
|
作者
Foss, Leslie [1 ]
Reisen, William K. [2 ]
Fang, Ying [2 ]
Kramer, Vicki [3 ]
Padgett, Kerry [1 ]
机构
[1] Calif Dept Publ Hlth, Vector Borne Dis Sect, 850 Marina Bay Pkwy, Richmond, CA USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Davis Arbovirus Res & Training Lab, Dept Pathol Microbiol & Immunol, Sch Vet Med, 3331 VetMed3A, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[3] Calif Dept Publ Hlth, Vector Borne Dis Sect, 1616 Capitol Ave,MS 7307,POB 997377, Sacramento, CA USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2016年 / 11卷 / 06期
关键词
MOLECULAR-DETECTION; VIRAL-RNA; CALIFORNIA; INFECTION; PCR; SURVEILLANCE; STORAGE; SYSTEM; FIELD;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0157555
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The California West Nile virus (WNV) Dead Bird Surveillance Program (DBSP) is an important component of WNV surveillance in the state. We evaluated FTA (TM) and RNASound (TM) cards as an alternative method for sampling dead birds for WNV molecular testing as these cards allow for more cost effective, rapid, and safer diagnostic sampling than the shipment of bird carcasses. To evaluate accuracy of results among avian sampling regimes, Reverse-Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) results from FTA (TM) and RNASound (TM) cards were compared with results from kidney tissue, brain tissue, or oral swabs in lysis buffer in 2012-2013. In addition, RT-PCR results were compared with results from oral swabs tested by rapid antigen tests (RAMP (TM) and VecTOR (TM)). While test results from the cards were not as sensitive as kidney tissue testing, they were more likely to provide accurate results than rapid antigen tests, and detected WNV in corvids as well as in other passerines, raptors, and waterfowl. Overall, WNV RT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct) scores from the cards were higher than those from tissue testing, but both card products displayed high sensitivity and specificity. American Crow samples provided the highest sensitivity. The cards also proved to be easier and more convenient vehicles for collecting and shipping samples, and in 2014 our program launched use of RNASound (TM) cards in the DBSP. Both FTA (TM) and RNASound (TM) products displayed 96% agreement with tissue results and are an adequate alternative sampling method for WNV dead bird testing.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Triggers for switching from minipool testing by nucleic acid technology to individual-donation nucleic acid testing for West Nile virus: Analysis of 2003 data to inform 2004 decision making
    Custer, B
    Tomasulo, PA
    Murphy, EL
    Caglioti, S
    Harpool, D
    McEvoy, P
    Busch, MP
    TRANSFUSION, 2004, 44 (11) : 1547 - 1554
  • [42] West Nile Virus and Usutu Virus Monitoring of Wild Birds in Germany
    Michel, Friederike
    Fischer, Dominik
    Eiden, Martin
    Fast, Christine
    Reuschel, Maximilian
    Mueller, Kerstin
    Rinder, Monika
    Urbaniak, Sylvia
    Brandes, Florian
    Schwehn, Rebekka
    Luehken, Renke
    Groschup, Martin H.
    Ziegler, Ute
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 15 (01):
  • [43] Toward Rational West Nile Virus (WNV) Screening of Organ Donors - Is WNV Serology Testing a Viable Option to Nucleic Acid Testing (NAT) for WNV?
    Chinchilla, Claudia
    Siriban, Jaime
    Brucal, Dem
    Schellenberg, James
    Stadtler, Maria
    Osborne, Eugene
    Patton, Kim
    Nelson, Helen
    Nowicki, Marek J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 9 : 549 - 549
  • [44] Evaluation of different trigger criteria for west nile virus ID NAT testing
    Williams, J. D.
    Robertson, G.
    Caglioti, S.
    Williams, R.
    Spizman, R.
    Busch, Michael P.
    Kleinman, S.
    TRANSFUSION, 2008, 48 (02) : 90A - 91A
  • [45] THE IMPACT OF WEST NILE VIRUS ON THE ABUNDANCE OF NORTH AMERICAN BIRDS
    Foppa, Ivo M.
    Beard, Raphaelle H.
    Hossain, Md Monir
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 2009, 81 (05): : 317 - 317
  • [46] West Nile Virus Prevalence in Wild Birds from Mexico
    Barbachano-Guerrero, Arturo
    Acini Vasquez-Aguilar, Antonio
    Aguirre, A. Alonso
    Zavala-Norzagaray, Alan A.
    Carrera Gonzalez, Eduardo
    Lafon Terrazas, Alberto
    Leopoldo Aguilar-Faisal, Jose
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE DISEASES, 2019, 55 (02) : 425 - 431
  • [47] Predicting West Nile Virus Seroprevalence in Wild Birds in Senegal
    Chevalier, Veronique
    Reynaud, Pierre
    Lefrancois, Thierry
    Durand, Benoit
    Baillon, Francois
    Balanca, Gilles
    Gaidet, Nicolas
    Mondet, Bernard
    Lancelot, Renaud
    VECTOR-BORNE AND ZOONOTIC DISEASES, 2009, 9 (06) : 589 - 596
  • [48] West Nile virus survey of birds and mosquitoes in the Dominican Republic
    Komar, O
    Robbins, MB
    Contreras, GG
    Benz, BW
    Klenk, K
    Blitvich, BJ
    Marlenee, NL
    Burkhalter, KL
    Beckett, S
    Gonzálvez, G
    Peña, CJ
    Peterson, AT
    Komar, N
    VECTOR-BORNE AND ZOONOTIC DISEASES, 2005, 5 (02) : 120 - 126
  • [49] West Nile Virus Monitoring of Migratory and Resident Birds in Germany
    Seidowski, Diana
    Ziegler, Ute
    von Roenn, Jan A. C.
    Mueller, Kerstin
    Hueppop, Kathrin
    Mueller, Thomas
    Freuling, Conrad
    Muehle, Ralf-Udo
    Nowotny, Norbert
    Ulrich, Rainer G.
    Niedrig, Matthias
    Groschup, Martin H.
    VECTOR-BORNE AND ZOONOTIC DISEASES, 2010, 10 (07) : 639 - 647
  • [50] ATTEMPTS TO DETECT WEST NILE VIRUS IN WILD BIRDS IN POLAND
    Niczyporuk, Jowita Samanta
    Samorek-Salamonowicz, Elzbieta
    Kozdrun, Wojciech
    Mizak, Zbigniew
    ACTA VETERINARIA HUNGARICA, 2011, 59 (03) : 405 - 408