Methotrexate, paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin in poor-risk nonseminomatous germ cell tumors

被引:7
|
作者
Pectasides, Dimitrios [1 ]
Pectasides, Eirini [1 ]
Papaxoinis, George [1 ]
Xiros, Nikolaos [1 ]
Kamposioras, Konstantinos [1 ]
Tountas, Nikolaos [1 ]
Economopoulos, Theofanis [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Athens, Dept Internal Med 2, Oncol Sect, Attikon Univ Hosp, Athens, Greece
关键词
Germ cell tumor; Poor-risk; Methotrexate; Paclitaxel; Ifosfamide; Cisplatin; HIGH-DOSE CHEMOTHERAPY; PHASE-II TRIAL; 2ND-LINE THERAPY; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; SALVAGE THERAPY; CANCER; PROGNOSIS; ETOPOSIDE; PROTOCOL; TAXOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.urolonc.2008.10.013
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: The efficacy and tolerability of M-TIP was evaluated as first-line treatment for patients with poor-risk germ cell tumors (GCT), according 1:0 International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) criteria. Patients and methods: Thirty patients with poor-risk GCT were treated with M-TIP (methotrexate 250 mg/m(2) given as a 4-hour infusion with folinic acid rescue on day 1, paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 given as a 3-hour infusion on day 1, followed by ifosfamide 1.2 g/m(2) given as a 2-hour infusion and cisplatin 20 mg/m(2) given as a 2-hour infusion on days 2 to 6) regimen for four cycles. Results: Five (16.6%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2%-31%) patients achieved clinical complete response (cCR) with chemotherapy only, 15 (50%, 95% CI: 31-69%) patients pathologic complete response (pCR) (11 had necrosis/fibrosis and 4 had mature teratoma) and 3 (10%) patients surgical complete response (sCR) for an overall favorable response of 76.6%. Twenty-one patients are continuously disease-free at a median follow-up of 5.3 years (range 0.9-8.4+ years), resulting in a 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate of 66.6% (95% CI = 49%-35%) and a 5-year survival rate of 70% (95% CI = 53%-87%). Toxicity was generally mild except for myelotoxicity. Patients with febrile neutropenia were successfully treated with broad spectrum antibiotics and G-CSF support. Hematologic toxicity in this trial was ameliorated with the use of G-CSF. Neurotoxicity and nephrotoxicity were not a problem, since only 6.6% and 3.3% of patients developed sensory neuropathy and renal toxicity, respectively. Conclusion: M-TIP is a highly effective (high proportion of patients achieved long-term disease-free status, lack of relapses) and well tolerated regimen for first-line treatment of poor-risk GCT patients. These results have to be compared with the standard BEP chemotherapy or more intensive regimens in multicentre randomized trials. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:617 / 623
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (TIP) salvage therapy for patients (pts) with relapsed testicular germ cell tumors (GCT).
    Mardiak, J
    Salek, T
    Sycova-Mila, Z
    Hlavata, Z
    Obertova, J
    Mego, M
    Reckova, M
    Koza, I
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (14) : 414S - 414S
  • [32] Paclitaxel plus ifosfamide and cisplatin in second-line treatment of germ cell tumors:: a phase II study
    Mardiak, J
    Sálek, T
    Sycová-Milá, Z
    Obertová, J
    Hlavatá, Z
    Mego, M
    Recková, M
    Koza, I
    NEOPLASMA, 2005, 52 (06) : 497 - 501
  • [33] A single institution experience: Paclitaxel/ifosfamide/cisplatin (TIP) chemotherapy in refractory or recurrent germ cell tumors.
    Karagol, H
    Derin, D
    Yazar, A
    Basaran, M
    Bavbek, SE
    Onat, H
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (14) : 439S - 439S
  • [34] Paclitaxel, ifosfamide and cisplatin (TIP) in patients (pts) with poor prognosis nonseminomatous germ cell tumor (NSGCT) with unfavourable serum tumor markers (STM) decline: A phase II study
    Israelyan, E. R.
    Tryakin, A.
    Rumyantsev, A.
    Fedyanin, M.
    Tyulyandina, A.
    Klimov, A.
    Matveev, V.
    Volkova, M. I.
    Paychadze, A.
    Bychkov, Y.
    Yunaev, G.
    Tsareva, A.
    Tikhomirova, T.
    Zorinova, A.
    Tjulandin, S.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2024, 35 : S543 - S543
  • [35] Better outcomes for patients with intermediate-risk and poor-risk metastatic germ-cell tumors
    Caroline Barranco
    Nature Clinical Practice Urology, 2006, 3 (3): : 121 - 122
  • [36] Salvage Chemotherapy With Gemcitabine, Paclitaxel, Ifosfamide, and Cisplatin for Relapsed Germ Cell Cancer
    McKenzie, Hayley S.
    Mead, Graham
    Huddart, Robert
    White, Jeff D.
    Rustin, Gordon J. S.
    Hennig, Ivo M.
    Cozens, Kelly
    Cross, Nadia
    Bowers, Megan
    Wheater, Matthew J.
    CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2018, 16 (06) : 458 - +
  • [37] High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell support in poor-risk germ cell tumors
    W. Siegert
    O. Rick
    J. Beyer
    Annals of Hematology, 1998, 76 : 183 - 188
  • [38] High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell support in poor-risk germ cell tumors
    Siegert, W
    Rick, O
    Beyer, J
    ANNALS OF HEMATOLOGY, 1998, 76 (05) : 183 - 188
  • [39] The Changing Landscape of Intermediate- and Poor-Risk Germ Cell Tumors: Do We Need to Reclassify Patients With Metastatic Germ Cell Tumors?
    Necchi, Andrea
    Nicolai, Nicola
    Giannatempo, Patrizia
    Raggi, Daniele
    Miceli, Rosalba
    Mariani, Luigi
    Salvioni, Roberto
    CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2016, 14 (01) : 1 - 4
  • [40] ACUTE TUMOR LYSIS SYNDROME IN POOR-RISK GERM-CELL TUMORS - DOES IT EXIST
    KATTAN, J
    CULINE, S
    TAVAKOLIRAZAVI, T
    KRAMAR, A
    DROZ, JP
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 1994, 2 (02) : 128 - 131